Soil Degradation and Migrations in the Age of the Global Environmental Crisis: A Policy-Making Perspective
- 379 Downloads
Abstract
There is a gap between science and policy in assessing the impact of soil degradation on migrations: policy is concluding that there is a cause-to-effect connection, already propelling massive population movements; and that action has to be taken now, even though its analysis is not yet confirmed with quantitative rigor. In the policy perspective, soil acquires a special status as an aggregator of ecosystem services that needs to be protected to prevent socio-economic and political instability which, in turn, are push factors for migrations: a set of relevant interactions between the state of soil, societal cohesion, and migration has been identified, centered on ecosystem services failures. Conversely, soil appears as a “practical object of intervention” because, more than other environmental variables, lands are concrete, localized, and understood as a fundamental value by human communities. Protecting them is likely to start comprehensive cycles of environmental and socio-economic rebalancing, with the potential of moderating population displacements. Land proper management and recovery could cost-effectively produce carbon sinks, hydric balance, biodiversity protection, food security, societal cohesion, gender benefits and more: a trans-sector approach to achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals.
Keywords
Carbon sink Climate change Desertification Ecosystem services Environment Feed-back loop Interactions Interlinkages Land degradation Migration Population displacements Security Soil Sustainable development goalsReferences
- A projection of severe near-surface permafrost degradation during the 21st centuryGoogle Scholar
- Austin J, Bruch CE (eds) (2000) The environmental consequences of war. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Cattaneo C, Peri G (2015) The migration response to increasing temperatures. National Bureau of Economic Research, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gee H (2004) Treeless at Easter. Nature CDXXXI:411Google Scholar
- Gemenne F (2011) How they became the human face of climate change – the emergence of ‘climate refugees’ in the public debate, and the policy responses it triggered. In Piguet E et al (eds) Migration and climate change. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Gray C (2011) Soil quality and human migrations in Kenya and Uganda. Glob Environ Chg 21(2):421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hodell DA, Curtis JH, Brenner M (1995) Possible role of climate in the collapse of classical Maya Civilization. Nature 375:391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hsiang SM et al (2011) Civil conflicts are associated with the global climate. Nature CDLXXVII:438Google Scholar
- Huntington E (1971) Climatic change and agricultural exhaustion as elements in the Fall of Rome. Q J Econ XXXI:173Google Scholar
- Lee JR (2009) A brief history of climate change and conflict. Bull At Sci (online), August 14 2009Google Scholar
- Lee HG, Zhang D, Brecke P, Fei J (2013) Positive correlation between the North Atlantic oscillation and violent conflicts in Europe. Clim Res LVI:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayda AM (2010) International migrations: a panel data analysis of the determinants of bilateral flows. J Populat Econ 23(4):1249–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morrisey J (2012) Rethinking the debate on environmental refugees: from ‘maximalists and minimalists’ to ‘proponents and critics’. J Polit Ecol 19:37Google Scholar
- Peterson LC, Haug GH et al (2003) Climate and the collapse of Maya Civilization. Science CCXCIX:1731Google Scholar
- White MJ, Lindstrom DP (2005) Internal migrations. BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Zhang D et al (2006) Climatic change, wars and dynastic cycles in China over the last millennium. Clim Chang LXXVI:459Google Scholar
- Zhang D et al (2007) Global climate change, war, and population decline in recent human history. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA CIV:19214Google Scholar