Advertisement

Disability Research in the Global South: Working from a Local Approach

  • Marcia RiouxEmail author
  • Paula Campos Pinto
  • Jose Viera
  • Rados Keravica
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)

Abstract

This chapter will look at ways of building into the research itself notions of rights and the power to sustain the work outside the context of the northern researchers who are likely to be the grant holders. We note the obstacles and barriers currently preventing the full enjoyment of rights by people with disabilities in the global South, by exploring how increasing participation and decision-making power in monitoring rights can lead to more sustained social change.

Keywords

Research process Contextualizing disability research and practice Human rights research Research advocacy 

References

  1. Barnes, C. (2001). ‘Emancipatory’ disability research: Project or process? Public lecture, City Chambers, Glasgow, 24 October. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Barnes-glasgow-lecture.pdf.
  2. Barnes, C. (2009). Disability in the majority world context: A materialist account. Presented at Disability and Economy Conference, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, 29–30 April. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Barnes-majority-world-2.pdf.
  3. Boucher, N., Fiset, D., Pinto, P., Dinca-Panaitescu, M., Carpenter, S., Killoran, I., et al. (2011). Droits humains et personnes ayant des incapacités: Analyse comparative de l’utilisation des services de soutien en contexte ontarien et québécois. Journal of Human Development, Disability and Social Change, 19(2), 23–41. Retrieved from http://www.ripph.qc.ca/revue/journal-19-02-2011-03.Google Scholar
  4. Friderers, J. (2008). Participatory research: An illusionary perspective. In J. Friderers (Ed.), A world of communities: Participatory research perspectives (pp. 1–13). Toronto: Captus University Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Khun, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Meekosha, H., & Soldatic, K. (2011). Human rights and the global South: The case of disability. Third World Quarterly, 32(8), 1383–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Oliver, M. (1992). Changing the social relations of research production. Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Oliver, M (2002). Emancipatory research: A vehicle for social transformation or policy development? Presented at 1st Annual Disability Research Seminar, Dublin, 3 December. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Oliver-Mikes-paper.pdf.
  9. Pinto, P. C. (2011). At the crossroads: Human rights and the politics of disability and gender in Portugal. European Journal of Disability Research, 5(2), 116–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rioux, M. (Ed.) (2000). Let the world know: Report on a seminar on human rights and disability. Office of the Special Rapporteur on Disability of the United Nations Commission for Social Development. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/stockholmnov2000.htm.
  11. Rioux, M. H. (2003). On second thought: Constructing knowledge, law, disability and inequality. In S. Herr, L. Gostin, & H. Koh (Eds.), The human rights of persons with intellectual disabilities: Different but equal (pp. 287–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rioux, M. H., Gilmour, J., & Angel-Cabo, N. (2013). Negotiating capacity: Legally constructed entitlement and protection. In B. McSherry & I. Freckelton (Eds.), Coercive care: Rights law and policy (pp. 51–75). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Rioux, M., & Pinto, P. (2013). Are we moving forward? Regional study on rights of women with disabilities in the Middle East. Palestine: Stars of Hope. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from http://oddh.iscsp.utl.pt/index.php/pt/2013-04-24-18-50-23/publicacoes-dos-investigadores-oddh/item/143-mulheres-direitos-humanos-e-defici%C3%AAncia-no-medio-oriente.Google Scholar
  14. Rioux, M., Pinto, P. C., & Parekh, G. (Eds.). (2015). Disability, Rights Monitoring and Social Change: Building power out of evidence. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rioux, M. H., & Riddel, C. (2011). Values in disability policy and law: Equality. In M. H. Rioux, L. A. Basser, & M. Jones (Eds.), Critical perspectives on human rights and disability law (pp. 36–56). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  16. Soldatic, K., Morgan, H., & Roulstone, A. (Eds.). (2014). Disability, spaces and places of policy exclusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Concluding observations reports by the committee on the rights of persons with disabilities. Retrieved from http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=4&DocTypeID=.
  18. Zubrow, E. (2014) Silences of sound: A prologue. In L. Eneix (Ed.), Archaeoacoustics: The archaeology of sound. Publication of proceedings from the 2014 conference in Malta. Sarasota: OTS Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcia Rioux
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Paula Campos Pinto
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jose Viera
    • 5
  • Rados Keravica
    • 6
  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Disability Rights Promotion InternationalTorontoCanada
  3. 3.University of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.Disability Rights Promotion InternationalLisbonPortugal
  5. 5.Disability Rights Promotion InternationalBuenos AiresArgentina
  6. 6.Disability Rights Promotion InternationalBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations