Advertisement

Social Protection, Chronic Poverty and Disability: Applying an Intersectionality Perspective

  • Marguerite SchneiderEmail author
  • Zitha Mokomane
  • Lauren Graham
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)

Abstract

This chapter uses key features of intersectionality to review the relationship between disability, poverty and social protection and how this translates into realities lived by people with disabilities. The essential thesis is that being disabled, poor or requiring social protection—in one form or another—are all ways of creating identities in their own right. When brought together in one’s life, these identities intersect and create a series of outcomes that are more than the sum of the individual components. The chapter begins by setting out important features of social protection as a strategy for managing risk and promoting development, followed by an analysis of the interaction of such a strategy with poverty and disability. We present a number of examples to illustrate our arguments.

Keywords

Social protection Poverty Economic risk Economic exclusion Development 

References

  1. Adato, M., & Hoddinott, J. (2008). Social protection: Opportunities for Africa. Policy Briefs No. 5. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. AWID. (2004). Intersectionality: A tool for gender and economic justice. Retrieved March 13, 2014, from http://lgbtq.unc.edu/sites/lgbtq.unc.edu/files/documents/intersectionality_en.pdf.
  3. Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality—An important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 102(7), 1267–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braithwaite, J., & Mont, D. (2009). Disability and poverty: A survey of World Bank Poverty Assessments and implications. ALTER—European Journal of Disability Research/Revue Européenne de Recherche Sur Le Handicap, 3(3), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & Mccall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies, M., & McGregor, J. A. (2009). Social protection: Responding to a global crisis. IDS Bulletin, 40(5), 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devereux, S. (2013). Africa Trajectories of social protection in Africa. Development South Africa, (March), 37–41. Retrieved March 13, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2013.755871.
  8. Devereux, S., McGregor, J. A., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2011). Introduction: Social protection for social justice. IDS Bulletin, 42(6), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eide, A. H., & Ingstad, B. (2013). Disability and poverty—Reflections on research experiences in Africa and beyond. African Journal of Disability, 2(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 3(52), 761–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gopaldas, A. (2013). Intersectionality 101. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 32(special issue), 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham, L., Moodley, J., Ismail, Z., Munsaka, E. & Ross, E. (2014). National study on poverty and disability in South Africa. CSDA Monograph. Johannesburg: CSDA, University of Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, L., Selipsky, L., Moodley, J., Rowland, W., & Maina, J. (2010). Poverty and disability in Johannesburg. Johannesburg: Centre for Social Development in Africa (CSDA), University of Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  14. Groce, N., Kembhavi, G., Wirz, S., Lang, R., Trani, J.-F., & Kett, M. (2011a). Poverty and disability: A critical review of the literature in low and middle-cinome countries (No. No. 16) (pp. 1–31). London. Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/lc-ccr/centrepublications/workingpapers.
  15. Groce, N., Kett, M., Lang, R., & Trani, J.-F. (2011a). Disability and poverty: The need for a more nuanced understanding of implications for development policy and practice. Third World Quarterly, 32(8), 1493–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ikäheimo, H. (2009). A vital human need: Recognition as inclusion in personhood. European Journal of Political Theory, 8(1), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Knoll, K. R. (2009). Feminist disability studies pedagogy. Feminist Teacher, 19(2), 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loeb, M., Eide, A. H., Jelsma, J., Toni, M. K., & Maart, S. (2008). Poverty and disability in Eastern and Western Cape provinces, South Africa. Disability & Society, 23(4), 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malan, M. (2013, 8 November). If they are raped, then so what? Mail and Guardian. Retrieved January 9, 2014, from http://mg.co.za/article/2013-11-08-if-they-are-raped-then-so-what.
  20. Marriott, A., & Gooding, K. (2007). Social assistance and disability in developing countries. Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.handicap-international.fr/bibliographie-handicap/4PolitiqueHandicap/thematique/social_protection/SOCIAL_ASSISTANCE_AND_DISABILITY_July_2007.pdf.
  21. Michailakis, D. (2003). The systems theory concept of disability: One is not born a disabled person, one is observed to be one. Disability & Society, 18(2), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitra, S., Posarac, A., & Vick, B. (2013). Disability and poverty in developing countries: A multidimensional study. World Development, 41, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mont, D. (2006). Disability in conditional cash transfer programs: Drawing on experience in LAC. Instanbul. Retrieved from http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/SP23.pdf
  24. Mont, D., & Nguyen, C. (2011). Disability and poverty in Vietnam. The World Bank Economic Review, 25(2), 323–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mont, D., & Nguyen, C. (2013). Does parental disability matter to child education? Evidence from Vietnam. World Development, 48, 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oxford Policy Management. (2013). Evaluation of the Uganda social assistance grants for empowerment (SAGE) programme Baseline report (pp. 1–170). Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.opml.co.uk/sites/opml/files/SAGE_IE_baseline_report_final_20130815_0.pdf.
  27. Palmer, M. (2011). Disability and poverty: A conceptual review. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(4), 210–218. doi: 10.1177/1044207310389333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Patel, L. (2003). Social development in a society in transition. Social Development Issues, 25(1&2), 150–161.Google Scholar
  29. Patel, L. (2005). Social welfare and social development in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rohwerder, B. (2014). Disability inclusion in social protection (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1069). Birmingham, UK: GSDRC, University of Birmingham. Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/HDQ1069.pdf.Google Scholar
  31. Schneider, M. (2009). The difference a word makes: Responding to questions on “disability” and “difficulty” in South Africa. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(1), 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schneider, M., Claassens, M., Kimmie, Z., Morgan, R., Naicker, S., Roberts, A., et al. (1999). We also count! The extent of moderate and severe reported disability and the nature of the disability experience in South Africa. Pretoria. Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://indicators.hst.org.za/indicators/Disability/CASE_we_also_count.pdf.
  33. Schneider, M., Waliuya, W., Munsanje, J., & Swartz, L. (2011). Reflections on including disability in social protection programmes. IDS Bulletin, 42(6), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Shaw, L. R., Chan, F., & McMahon, B. T. (2011). Intersectionality and disability harassment: The interactive effects of disability, race, age, and gender. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55(2), 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Swartz, L. (2013). Oscar Pistorius and the melancholy of intersectionality. Disability & Society, 28(8), 1157–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Swartz, L., & Schneider, M. (2006). Tough choices: The social mode of disability, social security and the challenges for implementation in South Africa. In B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz, T. Lorenzo, M. Schneider, & M. Priestley (Eds.), Disability and social change: A South African agenda (pp. 234–244). Pretoria: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  38. Webster, A. (1997). Introduction to the sociology of development. Basingstoke: MacMillan Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marguerite Schneider
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zitha Mokomane
    • 2
  • Lauren Graham
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Mental HealthUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  3. 3.Centre for Social Development in Africa, University of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations