The Fluid Connections and Uncertain Spaces of Women with Disabilities: Making Links Across and Beyond the Global South

  • Janet PriceEmail author
  • Nidhi Goyal
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)


This chapter maps aspects of the gendered experiences of living with and alongside disability in the global South and highlight openings in related feminist analysis. There are two main foci: 1. Challenging universalized views of disability by questioning how women with disabilities are positioned, especially in the global South, and how their positionality, subjectivity, and intersectionality are understood in light of shifting global forces. 2. Addressing the feminist critique of disability, as it incorporates new gender theory and a broadened geopolitics of globalization via feminist postcolonial and postconventional thinking(Shildrick and Price 2005; Parekh 2007; Meekosha 2011). These theories have opened avenues for a provisional politics of embodied interdependency and transformative connections which lead to hopes of a geopolitically aware ethics of flourishing (Campbell 2011; Puar 2012a; Shildrick and Price 2005).


Gender Disability feminisms Northern feminisms Southern feminisms Sexuality Cultural practices Gendered understandings Disability locations 


  1. Akram, A. (2011). The role of women with disabilities in community based inclusive development, March 2011. Barbara Faye Waxman Fiduccia Papers on Women and Girls with Disabilities, Center for Policy Studies. Retrieved October 21, 2013, from
  2. Al Jazeera and Wire Services. (2014, October 31). CEO blamed for Bhopal gas disaster dies. Retrieved November 2, 2014, from
  3. Athanasiou, A., Hantzaroula, P., & Yannakopoulos, K. (2009). Towards a new epistemology: The “affective turn”. Historein, 8, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berlant, L. (2007). Slow death (sovereignty, obesity, lateral agency). Critical Inquiry, 33(4), 754–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boserup, E. (1970). Woman’s role in economic development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  6. Budlender, D., & Moussié, R. (2013). Making care visible: Women’s unpaid care work in Nepal, Nigeria, Uganda and Kenya. Johannesburg: ActionAid.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, F. K. (2011). Geodisability knowledge production and international norms: A Sri Lankan case study. Third World Quarterly, 32(8), 1455–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CREA. (n.d.). Retrieved February 6, 2015, from
  10. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. Retrieved from Scholar
  11. DadaFest. (2016). Art D’Visions? Liverpool: DaDaFest.Google Scholar
  12. Daly E. (2015, April 22). Witness: Rana Plaza factory collapse still plagues survivors. Human Rights Watch. Retrieved June 8, 2015, from
  13. Das, V., & Addlakha, R. (2001). Disability and domestic citizenship: Voice, gender and the making of the subject. Public Culture, 13, 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deepak, S. (2013). Going beyond the taboo areas in CBR, Workshop Report, Part 1: Supporting social relationships, sexuality and reproductive rights of persons with disabilities through CBR. Bologna, Italy: AIFO. Retrieved from Scholar
  15. Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). Becoming-intense, becoming-animal. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Douglas, M. (1991). Witchcraft and Leprosy. Man, 26, 723–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erel, U., Haritaworn, J., Rodríguez, E. G., & Klesse, C. (2010). On the depoliticisation of intersectionality talk: Conceptualising multiple oppressions in critical sexuality studies. In Y. Taylor, S. Hines, & M. E. Casey (Eds.), Theorizing intersectionality and sexuality (pp. 56–77). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Erevelles, N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garland-Thomson, R. (2002). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal, 14(3), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghai, A. (2015). Rethinking disability in India. New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Dis/ability and austerity: Beyond work and slow death. Disability & Society, 29(6), 980–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goyal, N. & Padte, R. K. (2014) Women with disabilities and romance: A perspective from India. Paper presented at the First Global Conference: Sexuality and Disability, Inter-Disciplinary.Net, May 6–8, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  23. Grech, S. (2011). Poverty and disability. Disability & Society, 26(7), 888–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grech, S. (2015). Decolonising Eurocentric disability studies: Why colonialism matters in the disability and global South debate. Social Identities, 21(1), 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2001). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hughes, B. (2002). Bauman’s strangers: Impairment and the invalidation of disabled people in modern and post-modern cultures. Disability & Society, 17(5), 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamga, S. A. D. (2011). The rights of women with disabilities in Africa: Does the protocol on the rights of women in Africa offer any hope? Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria, February 2011. Barbara Faye Waxman Fiduccia Papers on Women and Girls with Disabilities, Center for Policy Studies. Retrieved October 21, 2013, from
  28. Mathers, C., Fat, D. M., & Boerma, J. T. (2008). The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maxwell, J. & Constantine, S. (Eds). (2007). A health handbook for women with disabilities. Berkeley, CA: Hesperian Foundation. Retrieved October 24, 2013, from
  30. McRuer, R. (2007). Taking it to the Bank: Independence and inclusion on the world market. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 1(2), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meekosha, H. (2011). Decolonising disability: Thinking and acting globally. Disability & Society, 26(6), 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meekosha, H., & Soldatic, K. (2011). Human rights and the global South: The case of disability. Third World Quarterly, 32(8), 1383–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mehrotra, N., & Vaidya, S. (2008). Exploring constructs of intellectual disability and personhood in Haryana and Delhi. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 15(2), 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miss Landmine Cambodia. (2009). Retrieved February 7, 2015, from
  35. Mitchell, D., & Snyder, S. (2010). Disability as multitude: Re-working non-productive labor power. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4(2), 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Keefe, P. (2009). People with disabilities in India: From commitments to outcomes. Washington, DC: Human Development Unit, World Bank. Retrieved from Scholar
  37. Parekh, P. N. (2007). Editorial: Intersecting gender and disability perspectives in rethinking postcolonial identities. Wagadu, 4. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from
  38. Parveen, S. (2014, April 23). Rana Plaza factory collapse survivors struggle one year on. BBC News. Retrieved November 2, 2014, from
  39. Petherbridge, D., Segal, L., Kokoli, A. M., & Deepwell, K. (2015). Misogyny: Witches and Wicked Bodies. Presented at ICA, London, 18 March.Google Scholar
  40. PSR—Physicians for Social Responsibility. (2015). Body count: Casualty figures after 10 years of the “War on Terror”. Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan. Trans. from German by Ali Fathollah-Nejad. Washington, DC: PSR—Physicians for Social Responsibility.Google Scholar
  41. Puar, J. K. (2012a). “I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess”: Becoming-Intersectional in Assemblage Theory. PhiloSOPHIA, 2(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  42. Puar, J. (2012b). Precarity talk: A virtual roundtable with Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Bojana Cvejić, Isabell Lorey, Jasbir Puar, and Ana Vujanović. TDR: The Drama Review, 56(4), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saldanha, A. (2007). Psychedelic white: Goa trance and the viscosity of race. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  44. Salinas, M. A. (2013, March 12). Attacks on Albinos surge in Tanzania. Voice of America. Retrieved April 19, 2013, from
  45. Sedgwick, E. K. (1999). Breast cancer: An adventure in applied deconstruction. In J. Price & M. Shildrick (Eds.), Feminist theory and the body: A reader (pp. 153–156). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Seshu, M. & Datta, B. (2014). Through the looking glass: Sex work and disability. Paper presented at the First Global Conference: Sexuality and Disability, Inter-Disciplinary.Net, May 6–8, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  47. Sexuality and Disability (n.d.). Retrieved December 15, 2015, from
  48. Shildrick, M. (2004). Queering performativity: Disability after Deleuze. SCAN: Journal of Media Arts Culture, 1(3), 1–6.Google Scholar
  49. Shildrick, M. (2009). Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity and sexuality. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shildrick, M. (2013). Sexual citizenship, governance and disability: From Foucault to Deleuze. In S. Roseneil (Ed.), Beyond citizenship: Feminism and the transformation of belonging (pp. 138–159). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shildrick, M. (2015). “Why should our bodies end at the skin?”: Embodiment, boundaries, and somatechnics. Hypatia, 30(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shildrick, M. & Price, J. (2005). Deleuzian connections and queer corporealities: Shrinking global disability. Rhizomes 11–12.
  53. Swadhikaar. (2009). Monitoring the human rights of people with disabilities: Country Report: Andhra Pradesh, India. Toronto: Disability Rights Promotion International.Google Scholar
  54. Symington, A. (2004). Women’s work exposed: New trends and their implications. Women’s rights and economic change (Vol. 10). Toronto: Association for Women’s Rights in Development. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from
  55. Tinker, I. (1990). Persistent inequalities: Women and world development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Waring, M. (2008). Human rights and unpaid care giving. Women’s Human Rights Net Reader, 1, 2–4. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from Scholar
  57. WHO and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from Scholar
  58. World Health Organization. (2002–2004). World health survey. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved March 29, 2015, from
  59. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Public HealthLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Independent disability and gender rights activist and writerMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations