Advertisement

Disability and Forced Migration: Intersections and Critical Debates

  • Maria PisaniEmail author
  • Shaun Grech
  • Ayman Mostafa
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)

Abstract

We live in unprecedented times – the number of displaced people has reached extraordinary proportions, as more and more people are forced to flee their homes. Poverty, environmental degradation, persecution, war and conflict are not only the source of mass displacement, but also the source of impoverishment and impairment. And yet, rarely visible, seldom heard, disabled forced migrants are persistently recast in an epistemological and ontological shadow. This chapter explores the disability/forced migration nexus in an attempt to understand some of the critical intersectionalities that emerge, and their implications for theory and practice. We argue that forced migration studies, as well as humanitarian responses, maintain an ableist approach focusing on heteronormative productive bodies, whilst disability studies continues to pursue social justice and access to rights within a corpus of knowledge framed within the hegemony of sovereign structures and liberal democratic norms, thus excluding the non-citizen disabled body.Engaging a critical approach, in this chapter we frame the study of disability and forced migration within broader global political, economic and social structures and processes, that seeks to locate the multidimensional individual within macro structures and processes, whilst acknowledging how the agency of the subaltern disabled forced migrant located in the global South persistently confronts, challenges and negotiates such global structures.

Keywords

Migration Forced migration Refugees Asylum seekers Global migration policy Human rights Citizenship 

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aleinikoff, T. (2015, February 25). From dependence to self-reliance: Changing the paradigm in protracted refugee situations. Retrieved March 11, 2015, from UNHCR Global Views: http://blog.unhcr.org/globalviews/changing-the-paradigm-in-protracted-refugee-situations/.
  3. Aljazeera. (2015, October 29). Amnesty: Australian officials paid people smugglers. Aljazeera. Retrieved December 8, 2015, from http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/10/amnesty-australian-officials-paid-people-smugglers-151028230421588.htm.
  4. Amnesty International. (2013). This is breaking people: Human rights violations at Australia’s asylum seeker processing centre on Manus Island, Papua New Guinea. London: Amnesty International. Retrieved September 14, 2014, from http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/ASA12/002/2013/en.Google Scholar
  5. Anthias, F. (2012). Transnational mobilities, migration research and intersectionality: Towards a translocational frame. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2(2), 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bach Baouab, T., del Valle, H., Derderian, K., & Ponthieu, A. (2012). Looking beyond legal status to human need. Forced Migration Review, 39, 19–20.Google Scholar
  7. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2006). Independent futures: Creating user-led disability services in a disabling society. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2009). Disability culture: Assimilation or inclusion? In G. L. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 515–534). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Berghs, M. (2012). War and embodied memory: Becoming disabled in Sierra Leone. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Betts, A. (2009). Forced migration and global politics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buscher, D. (2014, February). Preventing gender-based violence: Getting it right. Retrieved September 13, 2014, from Humanitarian Practice Network: http://www.odihpn.org/humanitarian-exchange-magazine/issue-60/preventing-gender-based-violence-getting-it-right.
  12. Castles, S. (2003). Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology, 37, 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chimni, S. B. (2009). The birth of a ‘Discipline’: From refugee studies to forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(1), 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Council of Europe. (2010, February 4). Commissioner for human rights: Criminalisation of migration in Europe: Human rights implications. Retrieved October 18, 2014, from Council of Europe: https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1579605#P99_13092.
  15. Crisp, J. (2002). No solutions in sight: The problem of protracted. San Diego: The Center for Comparative Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
  16. Crock, M., McCallum, R., & Ernst, C. (2011). Where disability and displacement intersect: Asylum seekers with disabilities. Discussion paper prepared for the Vulnerable Persons Working Group; International Association of Refugee Law Judges World Conference. Bled, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission. (2015, September 23). Managing the refugee crisis: Immediate operational, budgetary and legal measures under the European Agenda on Migration. European Commission. Retrieved October 24, 2015, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5700_en.htm.
  18. Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. New York: Gove Press.Google Scholar
  19. Forced Migration Review. (2010). Disability and displacement special issue. Forced Migration Review, 35. Retrieved from http://www.fmreview.org/disability/access.
  20. Grech, S. (2009). Disability, poverty and development: Critical reflections on the majority world debate. Disability and Society, 24(6), 771–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grech, S. (2011). Recolonising debates or perpetuated coloniality? Decentring the spaces of disability, development and community in the global South. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grech, S. (2015). Disability and poverty in the global South: Renegotiating development in Guatemala. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grech, S. (2016a). Disability and poverty: Complex interactions and critical reframings. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the global South: The critical handbook (pp. xx–xx). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grech, S. (2016b). Disability and development: Critical connections, gaps and contradictions. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the global South: The critical handbook (pp. xx–xx). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guterres, A. (2015, February 26). Open briefing on the humanitarian situation in Syria. Retrieved March 9, 2015, from UNHCR: http://www.unhcr.org/54ef66796.html.
  26. Handicap International. (2008). Toolkit on protection of persons with disabilities. Handicap International.Google Scholar
  27. HelpAge International and Handicap International. (2014). Hidden victims of the Syrian crisis: Disabled, injured and older refugees. London: HelpAge International and Handicap International. Retrieved October 18, 2014 http://www.helpage.org/newsroom/latest-news/hidden-victims-new-research-on-older-disabled-and-injured-syrian-refugees/.Google Scholar
  28. Hyndman, J. (2011). A refugee camp conundrum: Geopolitics, liberal democracy, and protracted refugee situations. Refuge, 28(2), 7–15.Google Scholar
  29. International Detention Coalition. (2015). There Are Alternatives. Melbourne: International Detention Coalition.Google Scholar
  30. IASFM. (2014). About us. Retrieved August 8, 2014, from International Association for the Study of Forced Migration: http://iasfm.org/about/.
  31. Kett, M., & Trani, J. (2010). Vulnerability and disability in Darfur. Forced Migration Review (Issue 35), 12–13.Google Scholar
  32. Koffman, E., Phizacklea, A., Raghuram, P., & Sales, R. (2000). Gender and international migration in Europe. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Milner, J. (2014). Protracted refugee situations. In E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, G. Loescher, K. Long, & N. Signona (Eds.), The oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies (pp. 151–163). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mirza, M. (2011). Unmet needs and diminished opportunities: Disability, displacement and humanitarian healthcare. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  35. Mostafa, A. (2015). Disability and forced migration: The experience of a Syrian Doctor. Disability and the Global South, 2(1), 551–555.Google Scholar
  36. OCHA. (2004). Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  37. Oliver, M. (1994). Politics and language: Understanding the disability discourse. Paper prepared for inclusion in the MA in Disability Studies Programme: Deptartmet of Psychotherapy, University of Sheffield. Retrieved from http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Oliver-pol-and-lang-94.pdf
  38. Pisani, M. (2011). There’s an elephant in the room and she’s ‘rejected’ and black: Observations on rejected female asylum seekers from sub-Saharan Africa in Malta. Open Citizenship (2).Google Scholar
  39. Pisani, M. (2012). Addressing the ‘citizenship assumption’ in critical pedagogy: Exploring the case of rejected female sub-Saharan African asylum seekers in Malta. Power & Education, 4(2), 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pisani, M. (2013). “We are going to fix your vagina, just the way we like it”: Some reflections on the construction of [sub-Saharan] African female asylum seekers in Malta and their efforts to speak back. Postcolonial Developments in Education, 2(1), 68–99.Google Scholar
  41. Pisani, M. (forthcoming). ‘Illegal bodies’ on the move: A critical look at forced migration towards social justice for young asylum seekers. Perspectives on Youth (Vol. 3). Strasbourg: Council of Europe and European Commission.Google Scholar
  42. Pisani, M., & Grech, S. (2015). Disability and forced migration: Critical intersectionalities. Disability and the Global South (DGS), 2(1), 421–441.Google Scholar
  43. Shivji, A. (2010). Disability in displacement. Forced Migration Review, 35, 4–7.Google Scholar
  44. Soldatic, K., & Fiske, L. (2009). Bodies ‘locked up’: Intersections of disability and race in Australian immigration. Disability & Society, 24(3), 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Soldatic, K., & Grech, S. (2014). Transnationalising disability studies: Rights, justice and impairment. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(2).Google Scholar
  46. UNHCR. (2009). Submissions to the 2009 Joint Standing Committee on migration inquiry into the migration treatment of people with a disability. Canberra: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  47. UNHCR. (2011). Working with persons with disabilities in forced displacement. Geneva: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  48. UNHCR. (2015, January 7). UNHCR report shows world’s poorest countries host most refugees. Retrieved March 11, 2015, from http://www.unhcr-centraleurope.org/en/news/2015/unhcr-report-shows-worlds-poorest-countries-host-most-refugees.html.
  49. UNHCR and Integra Foundation. (2015). My diversity: Age, gender and diversity perspectives in the Maltese refugee context. Valletta: UNHCR.Google Scholar
  50. WHO and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  51. Women’s Refugee Commission. (2008). Disabilities among refugees and conflict-affected populations. New York: Women’s Refugee Commission.Google Scholar
  52. Yeo, R. (2015). ‘Disabled asylum seekers?…They don’t really exist’: The marginalisation of disabled asylum seekers in the UK and why it matters. Disability and the Global South, 2(1), 523–550.Google Scholar
  53. Zetter, R. (2007). More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 172–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Youth and Community StudiesUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta
  2. 2.Centre for Global Disability ResearchThe Critical InstituteAttardMalta
  3. 3.Independent researcherMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations