Advertisement

A Strategic Approach to Climate Philanthropy

  • Edouard Morena
Chapter
  • 159 Downloads

Abstract

The chapter looks at how, over the course of the 1990s and in response to a shifting political context, a group of prominent climate funders adopted a more focused and strategic approach to grantmaking. While staying true to the core principles of liberal philanthropy, this new approach combined collaborative, proactive, outcome-oriented and evaluation-driven grantmaking methods with a pro-business, market-centred and bottom-up understanding of social change. By the mid-2000s, its core elements came to form the basis of a new approach to international climate philanthropy, bolstering foundation involvement in the international climate arena in the process. On the back of the Design to Win report (2007), a group of large liberal foundations proceeded to align their strategies and pool resources through common initiatives and projects, and most notable the creation of the ClimateWorks Foundation.

Keywords

Energy Foundation Strategic philanthropy Philanthrocapitalism Climate philanthropy 

Bibliography

  1. Alliance Magazine. 2007. Interview—Uday Khemka. Alliance Magazine, September.Google Scholar
  2. Anheier, Helmut K., and Regina List.2005. A Dictionary of Civil Society, Philanthropy and the Non-profit Sector. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bartosiewicz, Petra, and Marissa Miley. 2013. The Too Polite Revolution: Why the Recent Campaign to Pass Comprehensive Climate Legislation in the United States Failed.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, Matthew, and Michael Green.2008. Philanthrocapitalism: How Giving Can Save the World. New York, Berlin and London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Brest, Paul. 2002. President’s Statement. Hewlett Foundation, March. http://hewlett.org/uploads/files/PresidentStatement2001.pdf
  6. ———. 2012. A Decade of Outcome-Oriented Philanthropy. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring: 42–47.Google Scholar
  7. Brest, Paul, and Hal Harvey.2008. Money Well Spent: A Strategic Plan for Smart Philanthropy. New York: Bloomberg Press.Google Scholar
  8. California Environmental Associates. 2007. Design to Win: Philanthropy’s Role in the Fight Against Global Warming. ClimateWorks. August 2007. Accessed October 4, 2015. http://www.climateworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/design_to_win_final_8_31_07.pdf
  9. CBD. 2009. Consultative Group on Biological Diversity (CGBD): Interview with Mr. Michael Fischer. Convention on Biological Diversity, 27 January. Accessed May 4, 2016. https://www.cbd.int/doc/fin/submission/fin-cgbd-en.pdf
  10. ClimateWorks. 2010. 2009 Annual Report: An Expert Network. Annual Report. San Francisco: ClimateWorks Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2012. 2011 Annual Report. Annual Report. San Francisco: ClimateWorks Foundation.Google Scholar
  12. Commonwealth Club of California. 2009. Paul Brest & Hal Harvey. YouTube Video, 18 May. Accessed April 5, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBFVWrZ3XHk
  13. Dowie, Mark.2001. American Foundations: An Investigative History. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fern, Nora, Marc Daudon, Imen Meliane, Amy Solomon, and Kendra White. 2015. Oak Foundation Environment Programme Evaluation: Executive Summary. External Evaluation. Seattle, WA: Cascadia Consulting Group.Google Scholar
  15. Global Philanthropy Forum.2010. Global Philanthropy Forum: 9th Annual Conference (April 18–21, 2010). San Francisco: World Affairs Council of Northern California.Google Scholar
  16. Hamilton, Charles H.2011. A Hedgehog Moment: The Roles and Pitfalls of Strategic Philanthropy for Family Foundations and Donors. The Foundation Review 13(4): 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harvey, Hal.1999. The Importance of Focus in Effective Philanthropy. New Dimensions for Philanthropic Fundraising 1999(23): 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harvey, Hal, and Laura Segafredo.2011. Policies That Work: How to Build a Low-Emissions Economy. San Francisco: ClimateWorks Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Jenkins, Gary.2011. Who’s Afraid of Philanthrocapitalism? Case Western Reserve Law Review 61(3): 753–821.Google Scholar
  20. Katz, Stanley N.2005. What Does It Mean to Say That Philanthropy is ‘Effective’? The Philanthropists’ New Clothes. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 149(2): 123–131.Google Scholar
  21. Kimble, Melinda. 2012. Changing Climates: Philanthropy, Environmental Policy, and Climate Change. Global Philanthropy Issue Brief, Center for Public & Nonprofit Leadership, Georgetown University. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, 22.Google Scholar
  22. Kohler, Scott.2007. Biodiversity Protection: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. In Casebook for The Foundation: A Great American Secret, eds. Joel L. Fleishman, Scott Kohler, and Steven Schindler. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  23. Lawrence, Steven. 2010. Climate Change: The U.S. Foundation Response. Research Advisory. New York: Foundation Center.Google Scholar
  24. Medina, Sonia. 2015. Presentation—Practical Approach to Climate Finance: View from the Donors (CIFF’s Experience). Generalitat de Catalunya, 28 May. Accessed April 9, 2016. http://canviclimatic.gencat.cat/web/.content/home/politiques/acords_internacionals/conferencies_de_les_parts__cop/COP21_Paris/Climate-finance-CExpo_CIFF_Sonia-Medina.pdf
  25. Nisbet, Matthew. 2011. ClimateShift: Clear Vision for the Next Decade of Public Debate. Washington, DC: School of Communication, American University.Google Scholar
  26. NYRAG. 2008. Doris Duke Going Green. NYRAG Memo, April: 9–10.Google Scholar
  27. Paddock, Richard C. 2009. ClimateWorks is Carrying Out New Global Strategy. The New York Times, 5 December.Google Scholar
  28. Polk, George, and Peter Heller. 2009. Climate Change. Alliance Magazine, March.Google Scholar
  29. Rimel, Rebecca.1999. Strategic Philanthropy: Pew’s Approach to Matching Needs with Resources. Health Affairs 18(3): 228–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seldon, Willa, Thomas J. Tierney, and Gibani Fernando. 2013. High Stakes Donor Collaborations. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring: 46–51.Google Scholar
  31. Socolow, Robert, Roberta Hotinski, Jeffery B. Greenblatt, and Stephen Pacala.2004. Solving the Climate Problem: Technologies Available to Curb CO2 Emissions. Environment 46(10): 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spero, Joan E. 2010. The Global Role of U.S. Foundations. Foundation Center.Google Scholar
  33. St. Clair, Jeffrey, and Alexander Cockburn. 1997. Power Play: The Biggest Game in Town. Minneapolis-St. Paul City Pages, 12 March.Google Scholar
  34. Teltsch, Kathleen. 1991. In Rare Move, Big Donors Push Energy Efficiency. The New York Times, 11 January.Google Scholar
  35. The Energy Foundation. 2001. 10 (Energy Foundation 2000 Annual Report). Annual Report. San Francisco: The Energy Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. The Hewlett Foundation.2007. Taking Action on Climate Change. Menlo Park, CA: The Hewlett Foundation.Google Scholar
  37. The Rockefeller Foundation. 1991. President’s Review & Annual Report 1990. Annual Report. New York: The Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Wasserman, Harvey.1999. The Last Energy War: The Battle of Utility Deregulation. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edouard Morena
    • 1
  1. 1.ULIP and CNRS-LADYSSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations