Advertisement

Hedonism, Eudaimonia, and the Serious Leisure Perspective

  • Robert A. StebbinsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

The serious leisure perspective (SLP) is a theoretic framework that synthesizes three main forms of leisure, showing, at once, their distinctive features, similarities, and interrelationships The forms are the serious pursuits (serious leisure, devotee work) and casual and project-based leisure. It is during their serious pursuits that leisure participants are eudaimonic, are living according to the daimon. The casual leisure activities are hedonic. The third form constituting the SLP – project-based leisure – is also eudaimonic but significantly more weakly so than the serious pursuits. The SLP is set out in detail sufficient to portray how eudaimonism and hedonism are experienced in modern leisure. A treatment of the relationship of the SLP to well-being rounds out the chapter. Here the concept of optimal leisure lifestyle is used to show how all three forms of the Perspective can contribute to personal well-being. That is, both eudaimonism and hedonism are important ingredients in the recipe for a life of lasting happiness. In this regard, Self-efficacy and personal agency are discussed as two critical processes that generate eudaimonia, a state that can, however, be undermined by unchecked selfishness.

Keywords

Happiness Well-being Eudaimonia Serious leisure 

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  2. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  3. Hamilton-Smith, E. (1995, March 4–9). The connexions of scholarship. Newsletter (Official newsletter of RC13 of the International Sociological Association).Google Scholar
  4. Haworth, J. T. (1986). Meaningful activity and psychological models of non-employment. Leisure Studies, 5, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haworth, J. T., & Hill, S. (1992). Work, leisure, and psychological well-being in a sample of young adults. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 2, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hutchinson, S. L., & Kleiber, D. A. (2005). Gifts of the ordinary: Casual leisure’s contributions to health and well-being. World Leisure Journal, 47(3), 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mannell, R. C. (1993). High investment activity and life satisfaction among older adults: Overcoming psychological inertia through committed, serious leisure, and flow activites. In J. R. Kelly (Ed.), Activity and aging: Staying involved in later life (pp. 125–145). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Norton, D. L. (1976). Personal destinies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external locus of control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45(4), 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stebbins, R. A. (1979). Amateurs: On the margin between work and leisure. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Also freely available in the Digital Library, www.seriousleisure.net
  11. Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Stebbins, R. A. (1995). Leisure and selfishness: An exploration. In G. S. Fain (Ed.), Reflections on the philosophy of leisure (Leisure and ethics, Vol. II, pp. 292–303). Reston, VA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance.Google Scholar
  13. Stebbins, R. A. (2004a). Pleasurable aerobic activity: A type of casual leisure with salubrious implications. World Leisure Journal, 46(4), 55–58.Google Scholar
  14. Stebbins, R. A. (2004b/2014). Between work and leisure: The common ground of two separate worlds. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. (Published in paperback in 2014 with new Preface).Google Scholar
  15. Stebbins, R. A. (2005a). Project-based leisure: Theoretical neglect of a common use of free time. Leisure Studies, 24, 1–11.Google Scholar
  16. Stebbins, R. A. (2005b). Challenging mountain nature: Risk, motive, and lifestyle in three hobbyist sports. Calgary, AB: Detselig. Also freely available in the Digital Library, www.seriousleisure.net
  17. Stebbins, R. A. (2007/2015). Serious leisure: A perspective for our time. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. (Published in paperback in 2015 with new Preface).Google Scholar
  18. Stebbins, R. A. (2009). Personal decisions in the public square: Beyond problem solving into a positive sociology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  19. Stebbins, R. A. (2012). The idea of leisure: First principles. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  20. Unruh, D. R. (1980). The nature of social worlds. Pacific Sociological Review, 23, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Williams, R. M., Jr. (2000). American society. In E. F. Borgatta & R. J. V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 140–148). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations