Abstract
Subjective well-being or ‘happiness’ measures are now being used to monitor national well-being and also to appraise public policies. There is a lack of clarity in the literature, however, about what the various measures of happiness capture. This ambiguity acts as a barrier to our understanding of happiness and to applying happiness research to policy challenges. This article addresses the ambiguity using an inclusive framework that conceptualises and categorises happiness according to its ‘level’ – evaluations or experiences – and ‘type’ – ‘pleasure’ or ‘purpose’. Research has typically considered evaluations and there are very few studies that truly measure experiences of purpose. We therefore present new evidence on experiences of purpose based on time use data and more generally show that the determinants of happiness differ according to which level and type of happiness is being assessed. This then raises the normative question of how happiness should be measured. We present some serious problems with evaluations and so we emphasise experiences, ultimately arguing for the ‘sentimental hedonism’ approach – that happiness should be assessed according to people’s feelings, or sentiments, of pleasure and purpose over time. Our main conclusion, though, is that researchers should be more explicit about the underpinnings of their various measures and properly consider what sort of happiness we ought to aim for.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, M. D. (2012). Happiness surveys and public policy: What’s the use. Duke LJ, 62, 1509.
Akay, A., Bargain, O., & Jara. H. X. (2015). Large-scale comparison of decision versus experienced utility for income-leisure preferences (Institute for Social and Economic Research, No. 2015-2).
Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., Sandstrom, G. M., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Does social connection turn good deeds into good feelings? On the value of putting the ‘social’ in prosocial spending. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(2), 155–171.
Aristotle. (2002). Nicomachean ethics (S. Broadie, & C. Rowe, Eds.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York: Guilford Press.
Benjamin, D. J., Heffetz, O., Kimball, M. S., & Szembrot, N. (2014). Beyond happiness and satisfaction: Toward well-being indices based on stated preference. The American Economic Review, 104(9), 2698–2735.
Bentham, J. (1907). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & King, L. A. (2009). Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 208–211.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science & Medicine, 66(8), 1733–1749.
Brown, N. J., MacDonald, D. A., Samanta, M. P., Friedman, H. L., & Coyne, J. C. (2014). A critical reanalysis of the relationship between genomics and well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(35), 12705–12709.
Bruni, L., Comim, F., & Pugno, M. (2008). Capabilities and happiness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bryson, A., Forth, J., & Stokes. L. (2014). Does worker wellbeing affect workplace performance? Department for Business Innovation and Skills.
Burton, R. P. D. (1998). Global integrative meaning as a mediating factor in the relationship between social roles and psychological distress. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 39(3), 201–215.
Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2011). A review of the tripartite structure of subjective well-being: Implications for conceptualization, operationalization, analysis, and synthesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(3), 290–314.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., … Nesselroade, J. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 21–33.
Christodoulou, C., Schneider, S., & Stone, A. A. (2012). Validation of a brief yesterday measure of hedonic well-being and daily activities: Comparison with the day reconstruction method. Social Indicators Research, 115, 1–11.
Clarke, P. (2014). Does worker wellbeing affect workplace performance? Retrieved from https://app.croner.co.uk/whats-new/does-worker-wellbeing-affect-workplace-performance?topic=3307&product=8
Crisp, R. (2006). Hedonism reconsidered. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(3), 619–645.
Deaton, A. (2011). The financial crisis and the well-being of Americans: 2011 OEP Hicks Lecture. Oxford Economic Papers, 64(1), 1–26.
Deeming, C. (2013). Addressing the social determinants of subjective wellbeing: The latest challenge for social policy. Journal of Social Policy, 42(3), 541–565.
Del Boca, F. K., & Darkes, J. (2003). The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: State of the science and challenges for research. Addiction, 98(s2), 1–12.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34.
Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for Public Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52.
Dokic, J., & Lemaire, S. (2015). Are emotions evaluative modes? Dialectica, 69(3), 271–292.
Dolan, P. (2014). Happiness by design: Finding pleasure and purpose in everyday life. London: Penguin.
Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/35420/1/measuring-subjective-wellbeing-for-public-policy.pdf
Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2012). Measuring subjective wellbeing: Recommendations on measures for use by national governments. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 409–427.
Dolan, P., & Peasgood, T. (2008). Measuring well-being for public policy: Preferences or experiences? The Journal of Legal Studies, 37(S2), S5–S31.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.
Droit-Volet, S., & Meck, W. H. (2007). How emotions colour our perception of time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(12), 504–513.
Duncan, G. (2013). Should happiness-maximization be the goal of government? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 163–178.
Easterlin, R. A. (2013). Happiness, growth, and public policy. Economic Inquiry, 51(1), 1–15.
Ellyatt, H. (2013, June 6). Happiness matters, Merkel tells Germany. CNBC.
Feldman, F. (2004). Pleasure and the good life: Concerning the nature, varieties, and plausibility of Hedonism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fujiwara, D. (2010). The Department for Work and Pensions Social Cost-Benefit Analysis framework (Department for Work and Pensions Working Paper Series, 86). London: Department for Work and Pensions.
Hansen, T. (2012). Parenthood and happiness: A review of folk theories versus empirical evidence. Social Indicators Research, 108(1), 29–64.
Haybron, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hicks, J. A., Cicero, D. C., Trent, J., Burton, C. M., & King, L. A. (2010). Positive affect, intuition, and feelings of meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 967.
Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2013). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1–32.
Jivraj, S., Nazroo, J., Vanhoutte, B., & Chandola, T. (2014). Aging and subjective well-being in later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(6), 930–941.
Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16489–16493.
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A., Schkade, D., & Schwartz, N. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.
Kahneman, D., & Riis, J. (2005). Living, and thinking about it: Two perspectives on life. In A. Hupper, N. Baylis, & B. Keverne (Eds.), The science of well-being (pp. 285–304). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kavetsos, G., & Koutroumpis, P. (2011). Technological affluence and subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 742–753.
King, G., & Wand, J. (2007). Comparing incomparable survey responses: Evaluating and selecting anchoring vignettes. Political Analysis, 15(1), 46–66.
Knabe, A., Rätzel, S., Schöb, R., & Weimann, J. (2010). Dissatisfied with life but having a good day: Time-use and wellbeing of the unemployed. The Economic Journal, 120(547), 867–889.
Krause, N. (2009). Deriving a sense of meaning in late life: An overlooked forum for the development of interdisciplinary theory. In M. Silverstein, V. L. Bengtson, & N. M. Putney (Eds). Handbook of theories of aging, Second Edition (pp. 101–116). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 537–567.
Luhmann, M., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2014). Thinking about one’s subjective wellbeing: Average tends and individual differences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(4), 757–781.
Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592.
Mauss, I., Wilhelm, F., & Gross, J. (2004). Is there less to social anxiety than meets the eye? Emotion experience, expression, and bodily responding. Cognition and Emotion, 18(5), 631–642.
Meng, J., Jackson, T., Chen, H., Hu, L., Yang, Z., Su, Y., et al. (2013). Pain perception in the self and observation of others: An ERP investigation. NeuroImage, 72, 164–173.
Miron-Shatz, T., Stone, A., & Kahneman, D. (2009). Memories of yesterday’s emotions: Does the valence of experience affect the memory-experience gap? Emotion, 9(6), 885.
National Academy of Sciences. (2014). Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience. National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18548
Nelson, S. K., Kushlev, K., English, T., Dunn, E. W., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). In defense of parenthood: Children are associated with more joy than misery. Psychological Science, 24(1), 3–10.
Nozick, R. (1977). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Office for National Statistics. (2013, July 30). Personal well-being in the UK, 2012/13. Office for National Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/wellbeing/measuring-national-well-being/personal-well-being-in-the-uk--2012-13/sb---personal-well-being-in-the-uk--2012-13.html#tab-Sex--age-and-ethnicity
Office of Management and Budget. (2013). 2013 Draft Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations and Agency Compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/2013_cb/draft_2013_cost_benefit_report.pdf
Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2014). Can and should happiness be a policy goal? Policy Insights from the Brain and Behavioural Sciences, 1(1), 195–203.
Oishi, S., Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2007). The optimum level of well-being: Can people be too happy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 346–360.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). How’s Life? Measuring Wellbeing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/statistics/how-s-life-23089679.htm
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28(1), 1–20.
Pinquart, M. (2002). Creating and maintaining purpose in life in old age: A meta-analysis. Ageing International, 27(2), 90–114.
Pluess, M. (2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 138–143.
Ralph, K., Palmer, K., & Olney, J. (2011). Subjective wellbeing: A qualitative investigation of subjective wellbeing questions. London: Office for National Statistics.
Reker, G. T., & Wong, P. T. P. (1988). Aging as an individual process: Toward a theory of personal meaning. In J. E. Birren & V. L. Bengston (Eds.), Emergent theories of aging (pp. 214–246). New York: Springer.
Robinson, L. A. (2013). Cost-benefit analysis and well-being analysis. Duke Law Journal, 62(8), 1717–1734.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 934.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727.
Ryff, C. D., Keyes, C. L., & Hughes, D. L. (2003). Status inequalities, perceived discrimination, and eudaimonic well-being: Do the challenges of minority life hone purpose and growth? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 275–291.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39.
Salomon, J. A., Tandon, A., & Murray, C. J. (2004). Comparability of self rated health: Cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes. British Medical Journal, 328(7434), 258.
Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1991). Evaluating one’s life: A judgment model of subjective well-being. Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 21, 27–47.
Schwarz, N., Strack, F., & Mai, H. P. (1991). Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole question sequences: A conversational logic analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(1), 3–23.
Scollon, C. N., Kim-Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(1), 5–34.
Shin, J. Y., & Steger, M. F. (2014). Promoting meaning and purpose in life. In S. Schueller (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 90–111). Malden: Wiley.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). Rational actors or rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31(4), 329–342.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352.
Smart, J., Quinton, A., & Williams, B. (1974). Utilitarianism; for and against. Philosophical Quarterly, 24(96), 279.
Son, J., & Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteer work and hedonic, eudemonic, and social well-being. Sociological Forum, 27, 658–681.
Steger, M. F. (2012). Making meaning in life. Psychological Inquiry, 23(4), 381–385.
Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 22–42.
Stiglitz, J. et al. (2009) Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Retrieved from: http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm
Tadić, M., Braam, H., Van Vliet, K., & Veenhoven, R. (2013). Memory-experience gap in early adolescents’ happiness reports. Child Indicators Research, 7, 1–20.
United Nations. (2012). Defining a new economic paradigm: The report of the high-level meeting on wellbeing and happiness. Thimbu: The Permanent Mission of the Kingdom of Bhutan to the United Nations.
Van Landeghem, B. (2012). A test for the convexity of human well-being over the life cycle: Longitudinal evidence from a 20-year panel. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(2), 571–582.
Vittersø, J., Oelmann, H. I., & Wang, A. L. (2009). Life satisfaction is not a balanced estimator of the good life: Evidence from reaction time measures and self-reported emotions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(1), 1–17.
Waldron, S. (2010). Measuring subjective wellbeing in the UK. London: Office for National Statistics.
Watkins, E. R. (2008). Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 163–206.
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219.
Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12(2), 173–194.
White, M. P., & Dolan, P. (2009). Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1000–1008.
Wyer, R. S., Jr., Clore, G. L., & Isbell, L. M. (1999). Affect and information processing. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 1–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dolan, P., Kudrna, L. (2016). Sentimental Hedonism: Pleasure, Purpose, and Public Policy. In: Vittersø, J. (eds) Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42443-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42445-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)