Abstract
Has research by psychologists truly advanced our understanding of human flourishing and the quality of lives? Some philosophers (e.g. Nussbaum, J Leg Stud 37(52):S81–S113, 2008)) are sceptical and believe that the models and methods of psychology obscure or ignore those features of lives constitutive of flourishing. I engage this debate by calling for a reformulation of how we study the quality of lives by focusing upon well-doing or felicitous action. Well-doing comprises the sustainable pursuit of core projects in our lives. A social ecological model of project pursuit is presented in which the stable and dynamic features of individuals and the contexts of their daily lives are highlighted. Research on the social ecology of well-doing provides a thickly textured and granular level of analysis of how people craft their lives. It opens up a research agenda in which philosophers and psychologists can find congenial intellectual company and common purpose.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Like most psychological research our samples are largely WEIRD (i.e. white, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) (see Henrich, Heine and Norenzayan (2010) although that is gradually changing in our own research program.
- 2.
- 3.
Consider the personal project “ try to be more outgoing. “ Why might this be depressing for some and salutary for others? Who initiated the project seems pivotal. If it is pursued because one’s socially gregarious spouse insists on it, the course of that project may be demanding, and potentially depressogenic. If it originates with the project pursuer herself it is more likely to be construed as a self-exploratory adventure.
- 4.
Examples of dimensions defining these factors are: Meaning (value congruency, self-identity,), Structure (control, time-adequacy), Community (e.g. visibility, others’ support), Efficacy (progress, outcome likelihood) and Stress (difficulty, stress).
- 5.
Take a famous example proposed by John Rawls. He asks if the project of “counting blades of grass” outside the Widener Library at Harvard can be regarded as meaningful or worthwhile. Although the example is meant to underscore that some life pursuits are not intrinsically meaningful, from a psychological perspective this might be approached rather differently. There is a big difference in the merit of the grass project if it is being pursued by a despondent, addicted and suicidal street kid or if by an eccentric professor emeritus who wants to experience an example made famous by John Rawls. I must confess that I spent 14 min of my life doing exactly this and I was neither despondent, addicted, suicidal nor a kid at that time. I may have been eccentric, however.
- 6.
Interestingly, the dimension of ambivalence loaded on the negative affect factor but not on positive. Also, at the dimension level, challenge is linked to both meaning and stress, suggesting that challenging projects are more aligned with the kind of effortful pursuit associated with some views of eudaimonic well-being.
- 7.
It should be noted, however, that many of the women in these organizations were in the job for a shorter period of time than their male counterparts. It is possible that the gender effect may actually be more a “newcomer” effect, where forming social connections is part of the process of learning the ropes in a new institutional setting (Phillips, Little & Goodine, 1997).
References
Betzler, M. (2013). The normative significance of personal projects. In M. Kühler & N. Jelinek (Eds.), Autonomy and the self. New York: Springer. (forthcoming).
Bronfonbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: “having” and “doing” in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45, 735–750.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678.
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229.
Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569.
DeYoung, C. G. (2010). Personality neuroscience and the biology of traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(12), 1165–1180.
DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). Culture and subjective well being. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dowden, C. (2004). Managing to be free: Personality, personal projects and well-being in entrepreneurs. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
Helliwell, J. R., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2012). World happiness report. New York: United Nations.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzyan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.
Hwang, A. A. (2004). Yours, mine, ours: The role of joint personal projects in close relationships. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 219–233.
Kristjánsson. (2013). Virtues and vices in positive psychology: A philosophical critique. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Little, B. R. (1983). Personal projects: A rationale and method for investigation. Environment and Behavior, 15, 273–309. (205–244). New York: Wiley.
Little, B. R. (1989). Personal projects analysis: Trivial pursuits, magnificent obsessions, and the search for coherence. In D. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 15–31). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Little, B. R. (1996). Free traits, personal projects and idio-tapes: Three tiers for personality psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 7(4), 340–344.
Little, B. R. (1998). Personal project pursuit: Dimensions and dynamics of personal meaning. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry (Eds.), The human question for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (pp. 197–221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Little, B. R. (1999a). Personal projects and social ecology: Themes and variation across the life span. In J. Brandtstadter & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Action and self-development: Theory and research through the life span (pp. 197–221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Little, B. R. (1999b). Personality and motivation: Personal action and the conative evolution. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 501–524). New York: Guilford.
Little, B. R. (2000). Free traits and personal contexts: Expanding a social ecological model of well-being. In W. B. Walsh, K. H. Craik, & R. H. Price (Eds.), Person environment psychology: New directions and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 87–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Little, B. R. (2006). Personality science and self-regulation: Personal projects as integrative units. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(3), 419–427.
Little, B. R. (2010). Opening space for project pursuit: Affordance, restoration and chills. In C. W. Thompson, P. Aspinall, & S. Bell (Eds.), Innovative approaches to researching landscape and health (Open space: People space 2, pp. 163–178). New York: Routledge.
Little, B. R. (2011). Personality science and the northern tilt: As positive as possible under the circumstances. In K. M. Sheldon, T. B. Kashdan, & M. F. Steger (Eds.), Designing positive psychology: Taking stock and moving forward (pp. 228–247). New York: Oxford University Press.
Little, B. R. (2014a). Me, myself and us: The science of personality and the art of well-being. New York: Public Affairs Books.
Little, B. R. (2014b). Well-doing: Personal projects and the quality of lives. Theory and Research in Education, 12, 329–346.
Little, B. R., & Coulombe, S. (2015). Personal projects analysis. In International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 757–765). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
Little, B. R., & Frost, D. (2013). Aspects of love: Connecting, romancing and caring. In M. Hojjat & D. Cramer (Eds.), Positive psychology of love (pp. 162–176). New York: Oxford University Press.
Little, B. R., & Gee, T. L. (2007). The methodology of personal projects analysis: Four modules and a funnel. In B. R. Little, K. Salmela-Aro, & S. D. Phillips (Eds.), Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing (pp. 51–94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Little, B. R., & Joseph, M. F. (2007). Personal projects and free traits: Mutable selves and well beings. In B. R. Little, K. Salmela-Aro, & S. D. Phillips (Eds.), Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing (pp. 375–400). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Little, B. R., Lecci, L., & Watkinson, B. (1992). Personality and personal projects: Linking big five and PAC units of analysis. Journal of Personality, 1992(60), 501–525.
Little, B. R., & Ryan, T. J. (1979). A social ecological model of development. In K. Ishwaran (Ed.), Childhood and adolescence in Canada (pp. 273–301). Toronto, Canada: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Little, B. R., Salmela-Aro, K., & Phillips, S. D. (Eds.). (2007). Personal project pursuit: Goals, action and human flourishing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lomasky, L. E. (1984). Personal projects as the foundation for basic rights. Social Philosophy and Policy, 1, 35–55.
Lomasky, L. E. (1987). Persons, rights, and the moral community. New York: Oxford University Press.
McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness and meaning: On doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 494–512.
McKeen, N. A. (1984). The personal projects of pregnant women. Unpublished Bachelor thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
Melia-Gordon, M. (1994). The measurement and meaning of personal projects creativity. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
Nussbaum, M. (2008). Who is the happy warrior? Philosophy poses questions to psychologists. Journal of Legal Studies, 37(52), S81–S113.
Oishi, S., & Graham, J. (2010). Social ecology: Lost and found in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 356–377.
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
Phillips, S. D., Little, B. R., & Goodine, L. A. (1997). Reconsidering gender and public administration: Five steps beyond conventional research. Canadian Public Administration, 40, 563–581.
Salmela-Aro, K. (1992). Struggling with self: The personal projects of students seeking psychological counselling. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 33(4), 330–338.
Salmela-Aro, K. (2009). Personal goals and well-being during critical life transitions: The four C’s—channelling, choice, co- agency and compensation. Advances in Life Span Research, 14, 63–73.
Salmela-Aro, K., & Little, B. R. (2007). Relational aspects of project pursuit. In B. R. Little, K. Salmela-Aro, & S. D. Phillips (Eds.), Personal project pursuit: Goals, action, and human flourishing (pp. 199–219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Salmela-Aro, K., Read, S., Nurmi, J.-E., Vuoksimaa, E., Siltala, M., Dick, D. M., et al. (2012). Personal goals and personality traits among young adults: Genetic and environmental effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 248–257. ISSN 0092-6566.
Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1998). Pursuing personal goals: Skills enable progress, but not all progress is beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1319–1331.
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138–161.
Tiberius, V. (2008). The reflective life: Living wisely with our limits. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tiberius, V. (2015). Well-being, virtue and personal projects: A normative framework for virtue ethics and public policy. Unpublished ms., Department of Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Vittersø, J., & Søholt, Y. (2011). Life satisfaction goes with pleasure and personal growth goes with interest: Further arguments for separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6, 326–335.
Williams, B. (1982). Moral luck. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Little, B.R. (2016). Well-Doing: Personal Projects and the Social Ecology of Flourishing. In: Vittersø, J. (eds) Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42443-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42445-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)