Tension-Based Wearable Vibroacoustic Device for Music Appreciation

  • Yusuke Yamazaki
  • Hironori Mitake
  • Shoichi Hasegawa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9775)

Abstract

We propose a new vibroacoustic device that consists of a string and two motors, called a wearable tension-based vibroacoustic device (WTV). To demonstrate the superior performance of the WTV over conventional wearable devices, which contain vibrators, we conducted two experiments. First, we measured the amplitudes of vibration of the skin while subjects wore the WTV and Haptuators. We found out that WTV is better than Haptuators at transmitting low-frequency waves over a wide range throughout the body. Second, we examined subjective evaluations of acoustic vibration for both devices. Almost all participants considered the WTV to be a better option as a vibroacoustic device. We thus conclude that the WTV is a good option for applications requiring high-quality and strong stimuli, such as listening to music and virtual-reality gaming.

References

  1. 1.
    Komatsu, A.: Method for expressing vibratory music and apparatus therefor, 9 April 2002. US Patent 6,369,312Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patrick, G.: The effects of vibroacoustic music on symptom reduction. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 18(2), 97–100 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Naghdi, L., Ahonen, H., Macario, P., Bartel, L.: The effect of low-frequency sound stimulation on patients with fibromyalgia: a clinical study. Pain Res. Manage. 20(1), e21–e27 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marit Hoem Kvam: The effect of vibroacoustic therapy. Physiotherapy 83(6), 290–295 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyd-Brewer, C.: Vibroacoustic therapy: sound vibrations in medicine. Altern. Complement. Ther. 9(5), 257–263 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    SUBPAC\(^{\textregistered }\), 8 February 2016. http://thesubpac.com/
  7. 7.
    Woojer\(^{\textregistered }\), 8 February 2016. http://get.woojer.com/
  8. 8.
    Verrillo, R.T.: Vibration sensation in humans. Music Percept. Interdisc. J. 9(3), 281–302 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bresciani, J.P., Ernst, M.O., Drewing, K., Bouyer, G., Maury, V., Kheddar, A.: Feeling what you hear: auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception. Exp. Brain Res. 162(2), 172–180 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hove, M.J., Marie, C., Bruce, I.C., Trainor, L.J.: Superior time perception for lower musical pitch explains why bass-ranged instruments lay down musical rhythms. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 111(28), 10383–10388 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    William, H.T., Darian-smith, I., Hans, H.: The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive aff erents from the monkey hand1 (1968)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wood, A.W.: Physiology, Biophysics, and Biomedical Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldfarb, B.S., Fisher, J.D.: Acoustic entertainment and therapy systems for water fixtures, 2 July 1998. WO Patent App. PCT/US1997/003,710Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vibroacoustic mattress, 22 July 2015. CN Patent 204,483,597Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yusuke Yamazaki
    • 1
  • Hironori Mitake
    • 1
  • Shoichi Hasegawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Tokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations