Going Against the Grain – Texture Orientation Affects Direction of Exploratory Movement

  • Alexandra LezkanEmail author
  • Knut Drewing
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9774)


In haptic perception sensory signals depend on how we actively move our hands. For textures with periodically repeating grooves, movement direction can determine temporal cues to spatial frequency. Moving in line with texture orientation does not generate temporal cues. In contrast, moving orthogonally to texture orientation maximizes the temporal frequency of stimulation, and thus optimizes temporal cues. Participants performed a spatial frequency discrimination task between stimuli of two types. The first type showed the described relationship between movement direction and temporal cues, the second stimulus type did not. We expected that when temporal cues can be optimized by moving in a certain direction, movements will be adjusted to this direction. However, movement adjustments were assumed to be based on sensory information, which accumulates over the exploration process. We analyzed 3 individual segments of the exploration process. As expected, participants only adjusted movement directions in the final exploration segment and only for the stimulus type, in which movement direction influenced temporal cues. We conclude that sensory signals on the texture orientation are used online during exploration in order to adjust subsequent movements. Once sufficient sensory evidence on the texture orientation was accumulated, movements were directed to optimize temporal cues.


Texture Temporal integration Sensorimotor control Perception Psychophysics 



We would like to thank Maria Ebsen and Claire Weyel for their help in collecting the data and Steffen Bruckbauer for help with the figures. This research was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG; grant SFB/TRR135/1, A05).


  1. 1.
    Saig, A., Gordon, G., Assa, E., Arieli, A., Ahissar, E.: Motor-sensory confluence in tactile perception. J. Neurosci. 32(40), 14022–14032 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lezkan, A., Drewing, K.: Predictive and sensory signals systematically lower peak forces in the exploration of softer objects. In: 2015 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 69–74. IEEE, June 2015Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston (1966)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lederman, S.T., Klatzky, R.L.: Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 342–368 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lederman, S.J.: Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: the touching process and effects of macro- and microsurface structure. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 385–395 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson, G.O., Craig, J.C.: The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity. Exp. Brain Res. 170, 172–181 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nefs, H.T., Kappers, A.M.L., Koenderink, J.J.: Frequency discrimination between and within line gratings by dynamic touch. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 969–980 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gamzu, E., Ahissar, E.: Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial-frequency discrimination. J. Neurosci. 21, 7416–7427 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wismeijer, D.A., Gegenfurtner, K.R.: Orientation of noisy texture affects saccade direction during free viewing. Vis. Res. 58, 19–26 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wismeijer, D.A., Erkelens, C.J., Van Ee, R., Wexler, M.: Depth cue combination in spontaneous eye movements. J. Vis. 10(6), 25 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wexler, M., Ouarti, N.: Depth affects where we look. Curr. Biol. 18(23), 1872–1876 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hollins, M., Risner, S.R.: Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception. Percept. Psychophys. 62(4), 695–705 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cascio, C.J., Sathian, K.: Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness. J. Neurosci. 21(14), 5289–5296 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lamb, G.D.: Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans. J. Physiol. 338(1), 551–565 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaim, L., Drewing, K.: Exploratory strategies in haptic softness discrimination are tuned to achieve high levels of task performance. IEEE Trans. Haptics 4(4), 242–252 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Henriques, D.Y., Soechting, J.F.: Approaches to the study of haptic sensing. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 3036–3043 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drewing, K., Lezkan, A., Ludwig, S.: Texture discrimination in active touch: effects of the extension of the exploration and their exploitation. In: 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 215–220. IEEE, June 2011Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nefs, H.T., Kappers, A.M., Koenderink, J.J.: Amplitude and spatial-period discrimination in sinusoidal gratings by dynamic touch. Perception 30(10), 1263–1274 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mardia, V., Jupp, P.: Directional Statistics, 2nd edn. Wiley Ltd., London (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pruszynski, J.A., Johansson, R.S.: Edge-orientation processing in first-order tactile neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1404–1409 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johansson, R.S., Westling, G.: Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip. Exp. Brain Res. 66(1), 141–154 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Callier, T., Saal, H.P., Davis-Berg, E.C., Bensmaia, S.J.: Kinematics of unconstrained tactile texture exploration. J. Neurophysiol. 113(7), 3013–3020 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Justus Liebig UniversityGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations