Abstract
Movement of a limb substantially decreases the intensity and sensitivity with which tactile stimuli on that limb are perceived. This movement-related tactile suppression likely interferes with performance in motor tasks that require the precise evaluation of tactile feedback, such as the adjustment of grip forces during grasping. Therefore, we hypothesise that suppression might be stronger for stimuli that are irrelevant to successful performance in a given motor task. To test this hypothesis, we measured participants’ perception of tactile intensity while performing different motor tasks. We investigated perception of both supra-threshold stimuli (Exp. 1: intensity discrimination) and of stimuli close to the detection threshold (Exp. 2: detection). We compared tactile perception between two grasping conditions (active, tactile inputs relevant), a condition where participants pointed in the air (active, tactile inputs irrelevant) and a static condition (baseline). In both experiments, we observed tactile suppression in all three movement conditions but not the predicted attenuation of tactile suppression in the grasp conditions. Contrary to our hypothesis, there was even an amplification of tactile suppression in the grasping conditions of Exp. 1, which might be related to the movement velocity. In conclusion, we did not find evidence that motor tasks modulate the strength of tactile suppression. Our results further suggest that it is important to control for possibly confounding variables, such as movement velocity and laterality, in this line of research.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Brozzoli, C., Pavani, F., Urquizar, C., Cardinali, L., Farnè, A.: Grasping actions remap peripersonal space. NeuroReport 20(3), 913–917 (2009)
Chapman, C.E., Bushnell, M.C., Miron, D., Duncan, G.H., Lund, J.P.: Sensory perception during movement in man. Exp. Brain Res. 68(3), 516–524 (1987)
Colino, F.L., Buckingham, G., Cheng, D.T., van Donkelaar, P., Binsted, G.: Tactile gating in a reaching and grasping task. Physiol. Rep. 2(3), e00267 (2014)
Cybulska-Klosowicz, A., Meftah, E.M., Raby, M., Lemieux, M.L., Chapman, C.E.: A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement. Exp. Brain Res. 210(2), 291–301 (2011)
Debats, N.B., Kingma, I., Beek, P.J., Smeets, J.B.J.: Moving the weber fraction: the perceptual precision for moment of inertia increases with exploration force. PLoS ONE 7(9), e42941 (2012)
Drewing, K.: After experience with the task humans actively optimize shape discrimination in touch by utilizing effects of exploratory movement direction. Acta Psychol. 141(3), 295–303 (2012)
Drewing, K., Kaim, L.: Haptic shape perception from force and position signals varies with exploratory movement direction and the exploring finger. Attention Percept. Psychophys. 71(5), 1174–1184 (2009)
Garland, H.T., Angel, R.W.: Modulation of tactile sensitivity during movement. Neurology 24(4), 361 (1974)
Hautus, M.J.: Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of \(d^\prime \). Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 27(1), 46–51 (1995)
Juravle, G., Deubel, H., Tan, H.Z., Spence, C.: Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement. Behav. Brain Res. 208(2), 391–401 (2010)
Juravle, G., McGlone, F., Spence, C.: Context-dependent changes in tactile perception during movement execution. Front. Psychol. 4(913) (2013)
Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D.: What’s new in psychtoolbox-3? In: Abstract Supplement of the 30th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP), vol. 36, p. 14 (2007)
Lederman, S.J., Klatzky, R.L.: Hand movements: a window into haptic object recognition. Cogn. Psychol. 19(3), 342–368 (1987)
Milne, R.J., Aniss, A.M., Kay, N.E., Gandevia, S.C.: Reduction in perceived intensity of cutaneous stimuli during movement: a quantitative study. Exp. Brain Res. 70(3), 569–576 (1988)
Plaisier, M.A., van Dam, L.C.J., Glowania, C., Ernst, M.O.: Exploration mode affects visuohaptic integration of surface orientation. J. Vis. 14(13), 22 (2014)
Schmidt, R.F., Torebjörk, H.E., Schady, W.J.L.: Gating of tactile input from the hand. Exp. Brain Res. 79(1), 103–108 (1990)
Williams, S.R., Chapman, C.E.: Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. II. Effects of stimulus intensity. J. Neurophysiol. 84(2), 863–875 (2000)
Acknowledgments
NBD was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) grant HE 1187/19-1. MR, CG and MOE were supported by the Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology ‘CITEC’ (EXC 277), which is funded by the DFG. MOE was additionally supported by the FP7/2007-2013 project n8 601165 WEARHAP. We would like to thank Irene Senna for fruitful discussions and Miriam Henning for her work on pilot experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Debats, N.B., Rohde, M., Glowania, C., Oppenborn, A., Ernst, M.O. (2016). The Influence of Motor Task on Tactile Suppression During Action. In: Bello, F., Kajimoto, H., Visell, Y. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Control, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9774. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42321-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42321-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42320-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42321-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)