Abstract
In this chapter the essential basic concepts that are needed to build a socio-technical map are presented. Any social function—such as feeding, housing, mobility, supply of energy, healthcare, etc.—is fulfilled by one or more socio-technical (ST) systems. Each ST system consists of a network of innovators and a structure of material and immaterial constituents. Usually one ST system holds a dominant position: only ST “niches” are partially or totally protected from its selection pressure. The dynamics of ST systems may be grouped into two large families: the adaptation of a dominant ST system and the establishment of a new dominant position. Niches play a relevant role in both kinds of dynamics. The political dimension of the dynamics of ST systems becomes relevant when a dominant position is taken over: niche innovators must scale up a cumulative process between empowerment, legitimation and networking in order to gain a stable role into the public debate and possibly to influence the direction of change of agendas and actual policies. A sustainability transition (SusTran) is needed when a social functions is currently dominated by (or locked into) a ST system that is environmentally unsustainable. The mere adaptation of an existing dominant ST system is not sufficient to generate a SusTran. This is why the take-over of the dominant position of an unsustainable ST system is a necessary condition for a SusTran to take place.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amendola M, Gaffard JL (2006) The market way to riches: behind the Myth. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton
Avelino F, Rotmans J (2009) Power in transition. An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. Eur J Soc Theory 12:543–569
Brown H, Vergragt PJ (2012) Grassroots innovations and socio-technical system change–Energy retrofitting of the residential housing stock. In: Marletto G (ed) Creating a sustainable economy. Routledge, Abingdon
Bulkeley H, Castan Broto V, Hodson M, Marvin S (2011) Cities and low carbon transitions. Routledge, Abingdon
Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories—a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11:147–163
Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study. Res Policy 31:1257–1274
Geels FW (2005) Technological transitions and system innovations: a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Geels FW (2011) The role of cities in technological transitions: analytical clarifications and historical examples. In: Bulkeley H, Castan Broto V, Hodson M, Marvin S (eds) Cities and low carbon transitions. Routledge, Abingdon
Geels WF, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36:399–417
Haxeltine A, Whitmarsh L, Bergman N, Rotmans J, Schilperoord M, Köhler J (2008) A conceptual framework for transition modelling. Int J Innov and Sustain Develop 3:93–114
Hekkert M, Suurs RAA, Negro S, Kuhlmann S, Smits R (2007) Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74:413–432
Kern F (2011) Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability. Environ Plann C Govern Policy 29:1116–1134
Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B (2012) Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res Policy 41:955–967
North D (2005) Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford
Safarzynska K (2012) Agency and economic change. In: Marletto G (ed) Creating a sustainable economy. Routledge, Abingdon
Schot J, Geels FW (2007) Niches in evolutionary theories of technical change. A critical survey of the literature. J Evol Econ 17:605–622
Sengers F, Raven R (2015) Toward a spatial perspective on niche development: the case of bus rapid transit. Environ Innov Soc Transitions 17:166–172
Simon HA (1987) Models of man. Garland, New York and London
Smith A, Raven R (2012) What is protective space? reconsidering niches in transition to sustainability. Res Policy 41:1025–1036
Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout B (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res Policy 34:1491–1510
Suurs R, Hekkert M, Kieboom S, Smits R (2010) Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: the case of natural gas as an automotive fuel. Energy Policy 38:419–431
Unruh GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28:817–830
Unruh GC (2002) Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30:317–325
van den Bergh JCJM, Truffer B, Kallis G (2011) Environmental innovation and societal transitions: introduction and overview. Environ Innovation Soc Transitions 1:1–23
Walker W (2000) Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations. Res Policy 29:833–846
Zweynert J (2009) Interests versus culture in the theory of institutional change? J Inst Econ 5:339–360
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marletto, G., Franceschini, S., Ortolani, C., Sillig, C. (2016). Basic Concepts. In: Mapping Sustainability Transitions. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42274-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42274-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42272-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42274-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)