Skip to main content

SKARSE in Business Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wireless Mobility in Organizations

Abstract

Strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity (SKARSE) in business management is essential in a knowledge economy. There are various models which support this statement including strategies, architecture, resources, systems, technology, intellectual capital, and knowledge management. The chapter will also provide support to position SKARSE as a direct means for organizations and their respective leaders to navigate through the technological revolution. This includes advancements in information and communication technology (ICT), mobile technologies, and smartphone technologies. The chapter will conclude by linking all topics that have been introduced thus far, both individually and collectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antonelli, C. (2010). Working paper series: The economic complexity of technology and innovation. A review article of The nature of technology. What it is and how it evolves, by Arthur, W. B. Free Press, New York. Working Paper No. 3/2010, Department of Economics, Universita di Torino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, E., & Machin, S. (2000). Skill-biased technology transfer around the world. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(3), 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G. (2008). Knowledge-driven creative destruction, or leveraging knowledge for competitive advantage: Strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity as real options drivers triggered by co-opetition, co-evolution and co-specialization. Industry & Higher Education, 22(6), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G. (2013). Strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity (SKARSEâ„¢) in action. The Voice of Technology, Winter, 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Stewart, M. R. (2013). Obsessed maniacs and clairvoyant oracles: Empirically validated patterns of entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Provance, M., & Givens, N. (2011). Knowledge arbitrage, serendipity, and acquisition formality: Their effects on sustainable entrepreneurial activity in regions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(3), 564–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, G., Jones, A. C., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2007). Informal learning with PDAs and Smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2007). The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 511–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., & Grazzi, M. (2010). On the nature of technologies: Knowledge, procedures, artifacts and production inputs. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eng, T. Y. (2005). The effects of learning on relationship value in a Business Network Context. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 12(4), 67–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, A., & Ford, N. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., Soete, L., & Efendioglu, U. (1995). Diffusion and the employment effects of information and communication technology: New technologies: Job creation and destruction. International Labour Organization, 134(4–5), 587–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng, H., Lin, L., & Whinston, A. B. (2009). Effects of organizational learning and knowledge transfer on investment decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(2), 123–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemp, P. (2009). Death by information overload: New research and novel techniques offer a lifetime to you and your organization. Harvard Business Review, 3, 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtshouse, D. (2009). The future of knowledge workers. KM World, 18(9), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, E. Y., & Wei Lin, S. (2009). Do knowledge workers use e-mail wisely? Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huseby, T., & Chou, S. T. (2003). Applying a knowledge-focused management philosophy to immature economies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(2), 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H., & Hunter, M. (2007). How leaders create and use networks. Harvard Business Review, 85(1), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, K., & Lechevalier, S. (2010). Why some firms persistently out-perform others: Investing the interactions between innovation and exporting strategies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1997–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., & Ashraf, M. (2009). A review on knowledge management discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 10(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 56, 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. H. (2008). Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals. Information Management, 45(6), 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, L. T., Huang, C. W., Yeh, Y. H., & Lin, B. (2007). Adoption of mobile technology in business: A fit-viability model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(8), 1154–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, S. S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H. M. (2010). Investing acceptance toward mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metaxiotis, K., Ergazakis, K., & Psarras, J. (2005). Exploring the world of knowledge management: Agreements and disagreements in the academic/practitioner community. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, D., Forsyth, K., Maciver, D., Walsh, M., Murray, R., Irvine, L., et al. (2011). Key characteristics of knowledge transfer and exchange in healthcare: Integrative literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(7), 1408–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A., & Eagle, N. (2009). Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(3), 426–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmandad, H. (2008). Effect of delays on complexity of organizational learning. Management Science, 54(7), 1297–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Corlett, D., & Westmancott, O. (2002). The design and implementation of a mobile learning resource. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 220–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., Almeida, P., & Wu, G. (2003). Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Science, 49(4), 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, B., Sparkes, B. T., Brooksbank, D., & Williams, R. (2002). Social aspects of the impact of information and communication technologies on agri-food SMEs in Wales. Outlook on Agriculture, 31(1), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2009). Lifelong learning organisers: Requirements for tools for supporting episodic & semantic learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, M., & Rajala, R. (2010). Learning and innovation in inter-organizational network collaboration. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 25(6), 435–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zyl, A. S. (2009). The impact of social networking 2.0 on organizations. The Electronic Library, 27(6), 906–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clark, S.C., Valvi, T. (2018). SKARSE in Business Management. In: Wireless Mobility in Organizations. Palgrave Studies in Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42249-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics