Skip to main content

Considerations and Best Practices for Developing Cultural Competency Models in Applied Work Domains

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2073 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide recommendations for developing practical models of cultural competence. The aim is to help researchers construct actionable models that are likely to be adopted by their intended audience. We describe principles from the literature on workplace competency model development, with examples drawn from our ongoing efforts to develop the Adaptive Readiness for Culture (ARC) model. The purpose of ARC is to set standards for training culture-general competence for U.S. military personnel. Culture-general competencies support professionals who need to go anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice and work effectively with members of diverse populations. Defining this specific purpose constrains the model to ensure relevance. ARC emphasizes pragmatic, malleable skills and knowledge that are germane to the job context. The model is grounded in critical incident interviews of accomplished military professionals. By eliciting challenging intercultural interactions from the job, we further ensure relevance to the work demands and language of the audience. And by sampling culture-general SMEs as defined by precise criteria, we are able to examine culture-general competence as distinct from region-specific proficiency. The considerations and approach of our studies provide a template for the development of similar models in other professional domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We should acknowledge that attaining a sample of thousands that meets the stringent criteria for inclusion we described is unlikely to be feasible.

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. J. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhawuk, D. P. (1998). The role of culture theory in cross-cultural training a multimethod study of culture-specific, culture-general, and culture theory-based assimilators. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(5), 630–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, C. A. (2012). The marine FAO program. Marine Corps Gazette, 96(6), 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64, 225–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushner, K., & Brislin, R. W. (1996). Intercultural interactions: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. K. (2009). Synthesizing conceptualizations of intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 264–269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C., & Peterson, R. S. (2004). The elusive cultural chameleon: Cultural intelligence as a new approach to intercultural training for the global manager. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(1), 100–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endicott, L., Bock, T., & Narvaez, D. (2003). Moral reasoning, intercultural development, and multicultural experiences: Relations and cognitive underpinnings. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. L. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, R. R., Crandall, B., & Shadbolt, N. (1998). Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: A case study in the methodology of cognitive task analysis. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40(2), 254–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F, I. I. I., & Swanson, R. A. (2014). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., LeRoux, J., Ratzlaff, C., Tatani, H., Uchida, H., Kim, C., & Araki, S. (2001). Development and validation of a measure of intercultural adjustment potential in Japanese sojourners: The Intercultural Adjustment Potential Scale (ICAPS). International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25, 483–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28, 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osland, J. S., & Bird, A. (2000). Beyond sophisticated stereotyping: Cultural sensemaking in context. Academy of Management Executive, 14, 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context bound? Educational Researcher, 18, 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L. J., & Sieck, W. R. (2015). Culture-general competence: Evidence from a cognitive field study of professionals who work in many cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations.48, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L. J., Sieck, W. R., & Duran, J. L. (2015). A model of culture-general competence for education and training: Validation across services and key specialties. Yellow Springs, OH: Global Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, D., Patel, R., Bright, A., Gregory, D., & Gowing, M. K. (2002). Developing competency models to promote integrated human resource practices. Human Resource Management, 41(3), 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (No. 14). New York: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraagen, J. M., Chipman, S. F., & Shalin, V. L. (2000). Cognitive task analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2014). Rethinking the concept and measurement of societal culture in light of empirical findings. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sieck, W. R., Smith, J. L., & Rasmussen, L. J. (2013). Metacognitive strategies for making sense of cross-cultural encounters. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(6), 1007–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H., & Chagnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural communication competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 2–52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oudenhoven, J. P., & Van der Zee, K. I. (2002). Predicting multicultural effectiveness of international students: The multicultural personality questionnaire. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, 679–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C., & Fischer, R. (2008). Personality, cultural intelligence and cross-cultural adaptation: A test of the mediation hypothesis. In S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications (pp. 159–173). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. F. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winston R. Sieck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sieck, W.R., Rasmussen, L.J., Duran, J.L. (2016). Considerations and Best Practices for Developing Cultural Competency Models in Applied Work Domains. In: Wildman, J., Griffith, R., Armon, B. (eds) Critical Issues in Cross Cultural Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42166-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics