Skip to main content

Structural and Temporary Tax Mechanisms to Promote Economic Growth and Development in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Taxation and Development - A Comparative Study

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 21))

  • 996 Accesses

Abstract

France has adopted a territorial tax system for corporations. Departing from the prevailing rule of worldwide taxation, France taxes its corporations only on income (other than passive income) derived from operating in France. Under the participation regime, a qualified parent company may exclude from French taxation 95 % of a dividend received from its foreign subsidiary. This exemption is available only if the subsidiary is taxed at the prevailing rate in its country of residence (even if that rate happens to be lower than the top French rate of 33 %). This may provide an incentive for investment in developing or low-income countries wishing to attract investment. France is a party to numerous double taxation agreements and has used these treaties to provide a tax sparing credit to certain developing countries.

Synopsis

France has adopted a worldwide tax regime for resident individuals and a territorial tax system for corporations. For individuals, double taxation is alleviated by a foreign tax credit or an exemption of the income provided by a treaty. In the absence of a treaty, only a deduction for foreign taxes is allowed under the French General Tax Code (FTC).

In a departure from the prevailing rule, France taxes its corporations only on income derived from operating in France (and certain other income attributed to France by a bilateral treaty). The territorial regime does not extend to passive income (interest, dividends, royalties, and similar income) unless such income is derived from an asset carried on the books of a foreign enterprise (including a foreign branch of a French company).

Under the participation regime for foreign source dividends, a qualified parent company may exclude from French taxation 95 % of a dividend received from its subsidiaries. In order to qualify, the parent must actively participate in management, requiring ownership of at least 5 % of the capital and the financial and voting rights of the subsidiary. The exemption applies only if the subsidiary is subject to tax in France at the ordinary corporate tax rate or at the prevailing rate abroad (regardless of the actual rate, which would include, for example, Ireland and Cyprus). The parent-subsidiary regime is designed to attract holding companies to France, providing the advantage of a 1.67 % rate (33 % of 5 %) on dividends paid by subsidiaries. Dividends received from subsidiaries operating in so-called “non-cooperative” states, however, are not eligible for the exemption.

In some cases, the participation exemption extends to capital gains on the sale of shares held in a subsidiary. In this case, however, only 88 % of the gain is exempt from taxation.

Under the EU Mergers and Acquisitions regime, capital gain resulting from these transactions between companies subject to French tax and those in other EU member states (and third countries with approval of the French tax administration) is exempt from tax. Registration fees and stamp duties are also eliminated.

As described above, tax disincentives have been provided for taxpayers that engage in transactions with certain “non-cooperative” states or territories (NCST). An exceptionally high withholding tax rate, 75 %, is applied to payments of dividends, interest, and royalties paid to financial institutions located in a NCST. Real estate profits, capital gains from real estate or the sale of shares, and income from artistic or sporting services are subject to the same withholding rate when derived or received by entities established in a NCST. A 60 % rate is applied to trusts, gifts, or transfers made by a settlor if the trustee is established in or a resident of a NCST.

Additional denial of tax benefits includes disqualification from the participation exemption regime for dividends received from (and capital gains from the sale of shares of) subsidiaries established in a NCST. In addition, payments of dividends, interest, royalties and payments for services made to entities located in a NCST may not be deducted from the French income tax base. Special rules apply to CFCs located in a NCST (deemed distribution of dividends to parent) and for purposes of transfer pricing documentation. None of the disincentives applies if the taxpayer can prove that NCST operations were undertaken with a purpose other than to shift benefits. A country may only be a NCST if (i) it is not a member of the EU, (ii) the OECD has analyzed the country’s exchange of information practices, (iii) it has not entered into an exchange of information agreement with France containing a mutual assistance clause, and (iv) it has not entered into any mutual agreement or treaty with 12 or more member states. Eight countries are listed as NCSTs by the French Ministry: Botswana, Brunei, Guatemala, the Marshall Islands, the British Virgin Islands, Montserrat, Nauru, and Niue.

France has implemented additional disincentives for preferential tax regimes. A preferential tax regime is one in which the amount of tax imposed on an item of income is 50 % less than the tax that would have been imposed on France. The emphasis is on effective tax rates and not nominal or statutory tax rates.

Operations in countries with preferential tax regimes have significant disadvantages. Deductions for payments made by French companies to individuals or legal entities domiciled in such countries are not allowed unless the taxpayer can establish that the transactions are real and do not involve artificial amounts. If an entity subject to French corporate tax owns a greater-than-50 % interest in any entity established outside of France that benefits from a preferential regime, a proportionate amount (relative to the shares held) of the profits of the entity is taxable in France. Anti-abuse rules relating to CFC apply automatically to entities situated in a preferential regime.

As a member of the OECD, France participates in the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices and the Global Tax Forum (GTF). After phase 1 and phase 2 review by the GTF, France’s system has been deemed “compliant.”

France has an extensive network of information exchange agreements with 142 partners. These include double tax agreements and TIEAs. Exchange of information generally follows the OECD Model Convention’s Article 26, except those concluded with former French colonies which are based on Article 26 of the UN Model Convention. Because of its membership in the OECD and the Council of Europe, France is obligated to provide administrative assistance in tax matters under a number of specific directives and Conventions. The type of information to be exchanged and the types of taxes covered vary from treaty to treaty.

Incentives to Invest Abroad

The French tax system provides some incentives for investment abroad in developing and developed countries. The former “worldwide tax consolidation regime,” designed to encourage international development, allowed French multinationals to consolidate the income or losses of their foreign branches or subsidiaries with their French taxable income or losses. It was granted to large enterprises on a case-by-case basis until the resulting heavy budgetary losses and concerns that such benefits were accorded only to multinationals caused it to be repealed in 2011.

Since 2009, a special regime applies to small and medium enterprises (SMEs) which are allowed to deduct (for up to 5 years) losses from 95 %-owned foreign branches or subsidiaries established in EU member states or in countries with which France has concluded a tax treaty containing an administrative assistance clause. This benefit is available only if the branch or subsidiary is subject to a tax equivalent to a corporate tax. Special rules apply this regime to subsidiaries organized in EU states, Norway, or Iceland, even if they are not subject to corporate tax. This measure is designed to encourage French SMEs to go abroad by reducing the initial costs of doing so, allowing these costs to offset the French tax base of the owner.

SMEs are also encouraged to go abroad by benefiting from a special tax credit for up to 50 % of prospecting expenditures incurred in order to permit export outside of the EU market. There is a ceiling on eligible expenditures and a 2-year limit on availability.

In order to encourage investment in developing countries, France has used double taxation agreements to provide a “tax sparing credit” to certain developing countries. This credit applies to passive income and allows an offset against French tax liability for a fictitious tax (or one higher than the French rate of tax) levied in the country in which investment is made. An example of this is the Décote africaine contained in the DTCs with French-speaking African countries. Because the tax sparing credit provided no incentive for French companies to re-invest the tax savings in the local economy, these types of agreements have receded.

There are incentives for investment in overseas French departments and territories. These include a reduced income tax rate or a deduction from income subject to French corporate tax. These incentives are available only for investments in important sectors of economic activity for the locality, including tourism, aquaculture, renewable energy, or in some cases, mining.

Incentives to Invest in France

France provides a number of incentives for economic activity within its borders. These include incentives built into the general tax base, such as generous depreciation rules, carry back and forward of losses, and generous research and jobs creation tax credits. A special regime to encourage companies to establish headquarters or logistics centers in France (to coordinate provision of management, auditing, and other administrative services to a group of companies) is also provided. This also involves tax exemptions of limited duration for income paid to certain employees of these companies.

Companies that locate in certain disadvantaged or otherwise targeted areas may benefit from corporate tax exemptions for specified periods. Innovative new companies that are SMEs may also enjoy a tax exemption.

Corporate Tax Rate Structure

The corporate tax rate is 33.33 %, with an additional 3.3 % social contribution imposed on companies with income exceeding a certain level. Large enterprises must pay an additional “exceptional contribution” for a limited period.

A reduced rate of 15 % applies to income from intellectual property, including royalties and capital gains derived on the transfer, held for at least 2 years.

SMEs are taxed at the reduced rate of 15 % on a first level of income and 33.33 % on the remainder.

Trade and Investment Agreements

France is a party to a number of bilateral and multilateral trade and investment agreements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Article 55 of the French Constitution of 4 October 1958.

  2. 2.

    See Council of State (CE), judgment of 28 June 2002, n° 232276, Schneider Electric (RJF 10/02 n° 1080).

  3. 3.

    Articles 4A and 4B of the French General Tax Code (FTC).

  4. 4.

    Article 12 FTC.

  5. 5.

    Article 209C FTC.

  6. 6.

    See articles 145 and 216 FTC (introduced by Law of 31 July 1920).

  7. 7.

    Tax Circular of 27 April 2012 (BOI 14A-5-12 of 10 May 2012).

  8. 8.

    Article 219-I a quinquies FTC (introduced by Law n° 2004-1485 of 30 December 2004).

  9. 9.

    Article 223D FTC.

  10. 10.

    Directive 2009/133/CE, OJEU L 310/34 of 23 November 2009.

  11. 11.

    Articles 210-0A, 210A, 210B, 210B bis and 210C FTC.

  12. 12.

    Article 238-0 A FTC (introduced by Law n°2009-1674 of 30 December 2009).

  13. 13.

    See articles 187 (for dividends), 125A-III (for interests) and 182B (for royalties) FTC.

  14. 14.

    Articles 244 bis, 244 bis A and 244 bis B FTC.

  15. 15.

    Articles 182A bis and 182B FTC.

  16. 16.

    Article 238A FTC.

  17. 17.

    See Article 238A FTC.

  18. 18.

    French Council of State (CE), judgment of 21 March 1986, Auriège. See also, CE, judgment of 25 January 1989, n° 49847; CE, judgment of 30 September 1992, Sarl Toul France.

  19. 19.

    OECD, “Harmful Tax Competition, An Emerging Global Issue” (1998) (the “1998 Report”).

  20. 20.

    OECD, Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: France 2013 Combined: Phase 1 + Phase 2, incorporating Phase 2 ratings.

  21. 21.

    See DTC with Burkina Faso (11/08/1965), Benin (27/02/1965), Cameroon (21/10/1976), Central African Republic (13/12/1969), Ivory Coast (06/04/1966), Lebanon (24/07/1962), Mali (22/09/1972), Morocco (29/05/1970), Mauritania (15/11/1967), Niger (01/06/1965), Senegal (29/03/1974) and Togo (24/11/1971). Strangely, the same formulation is adopted in the DTC with Ireland (21/03/1968).

  22. 22.

    These DTCs clarify that the exchange of information is necessary “in particular for the prevention of fraud or evasion of such taxes”: see the DTCs with Qatar (04/12/1990), Philippines (09/01/1976), Pakistan (15/06/1994), Malaysia (24/06/1975), India (29/09/1992), South Korea (19/06/1979) China (30/05/1984) and Botswana (15/06/1999), as well as the new DTC with the United Kingdom (19/06/2008).

  23. 23.

    See the list of TIEAs in force on 1 June 2012: Bulletin Officiel des Finances Publiques-Impôts, BOI-ANNX-000307-20120912 (12 September 2012). For more information, see the OECD Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for tax purposes.

  24. 24.

    The provisions of this directive were incorporated in articles L.114A and R*114A-1 to 5 of the French Tax Procedures Book.

  25. 25.

    To this date, only Saint-Bathélemy applies EU legislation on exchange of information. See the Agreement between the European Union and the French Republic concerning the application to the collectivity of Saint-Barthélemy of Union legislation on the taxation of savings and administrative cooperation in the field of taxation signed on 17 February 2014.

  26. 26.

    The Convention entered into force in France on 1 September 2005 and the Protocol on 1 April 2012.

  27. 27.

    Article 39 of the Organic Law no. 2004-192 for French Polynesia; Article LO.6351-15 of the French General Code of Territorial Communities (CGCT) for Saint Martin; Article LO.6251-15 CGCT for Saint Barthélemy; Article LO.6461-15 CGCT for Saint Pierre and Miquelon.

  28. 28.

    On this issue, see Thomas Dubut, ‘Brief Critical Observations on the Problem of Horizontal Tax Coordination between ‘Overseas Territorial Communities’ within the French Republic’, in: M. Lang, P. Pistone, J. Schuch and C. Staringer (eds.), Horizontal Tax Coordination within the EU and within States (Amsterdam: IBFD, 2012) pp. 295–308 (p. 299).

  29. 29.

    See the DTCs concluded with Algeria (17/10/1999), Finland (11/09/1970), Jamaica (09/08/1995), Sweden (27/11/1990), Trinity and Tobago (05/08/1987), Ukraine (31/01/1997), Panama (30/06/2011), Pakistan (15/06/1994), Madagascar (22/07/1983), Greece (21/08/1963), Finland (Inheritance Tax Treaty: 25/08/1958), Spain (10/10/1995) and Botswana (15/04/1999).

  30. 30.

    See the protocols of the DTCs concluded with Austria (26/03/1993 amended on 23/05/2011), Hong-Kong (21/10/2010) and Switzerland (09/09/1966 amended on 27/08/2009).

  31. 31.

    See DTCs concluded with Algeria (17/10/1999), Philippines (09/01/1976), Germany (21/07/1959), Belgium (10/03/1964), Chile (07/06/2004), Mauritius (11/12/1980), Panama (30/06/2011), Switzerland (09/09/1966 amended on 27/08/2009), Switzerland (Inheritance Tax Treaty: 31/12/1953), Sri Lanka (17/09/1981), United Kingdom (Inheritance Tax Treaty: 21/06/1963), Malawi (21/08/1951), Zambia (21/08/1951), Greece (21/08/1963) and the United States of America (31/08/1994).

  32. 32.

    See the DTCs with the former African French colonies (see supra FN 102) and Ireland (21/03/1968), Lebanon (24/07/1962), the Netherlands (16/03/1973) and Finland (Inheritance Tax Treaty: 25/08/1958).

  33. 33.

    As provided in the DTCs concluded with Bahrain (10/05/1993 amended on 07/05/2009) and Switzerland (09/09/1966 amended on 27/08/2009).

  34. 34.

    See the DTC with the United States of America (31/08/1994).

  35. 35.

    Such an agreement has been concluded with the Netherlands (BOI 13 K-3-96 of 7 August 1996), Sweden (agreement of 17 April 1998, BOI 13 K-6-98 of 19 May 1998), Germany (agreement of 18 October 2001, BOI 13 K-13-01 of 20 November 2001); Belgium (agreement of 10 July 2002, BOI 13 K-10-02 of 7 14 October 2002) and Russia (agreement of 28 January 2004, BOI 13 K-7-04 of 27 October 2004).

  36. 36.

    B. Gouthière, Les impôts dans les affaires internationales, (Levallois-Perret: Ed. Francis Lefebvre, 2010) No. 74305 (p. 876).

  37. 37.

    See the DTCs with Turkey (18/02/1987), Namibia (29/05/1996), India (29/09/1992), Indonesia (14/09/1979) and Bolivia (15/12/1994).

  38. 38.

    10/03/1964.

  39. 39.

    14/01/1971.

  40. 40.

    This is the case for the DTCs concluded with French speaking African countries (model clause), as well as for the DTCs concluded with Ireland (21/03/1968), Lebanon (24/07/1962), Spain (Inheritance Tax Treaty: 08/01/1963), Finland (Inheritance Tax Treaty: 25/08/1958) and Germany (21/07/1959).

  41. 41.

    04/12/1990 amended on 14/01/2008.

  42. 42.

    28/04/1980.

  43. 43.

    04/10/1985.

  44. 44.

    Article 209 quinquies FTC and articles 103–134 ter A of the Annexe II FTC.

  45. 45.

    The French Tax Administration had approved only about ten applications of the most important French groups to be taxed under this regime. In 2011, only five French groups were under this regime.

  46. 46.

    I.e., companies subject to corporate tax that employ less than 2,000 persons and which are not owned at 25 % or more, directly or indirectly, by another company having more than 2,000 employees.

  47. 47.

    Article 209C FTC.

  48. 48.

    Article 244 quater H FTC.

  49. 49.

    See B. Gouthière, op. cit., No. 8120 (p. 159).

  50. 50.

    This is in line with the 1986 OECD report on fictitious tax credits (OECD-MTC, Tome II, R(14).

  51. 51.

    Article 73 of the French Constitution of 1958.

  52. 52.

    Article 74 of the French Constitution of 1958.

  53. 53.

    Article 77 of the French Constitution of 1958.

  54. 54.

    Law n° 2003-660 of 21 July 2003.

  55. 55.

    Article 199 undecies B FTC.

  56. 56.

    Article 217 undecies FTC.

  57. 57.

    Local statute n° 2002-19 of 29 April 2002.

  58. 58.

    Articles 39, 1–2° and 39 A sq. FTC.

  59. 59.

    Article 209-0 B FTC.

  60. 60.

    Article 244 quater B FTC

  61. 61.

    Article 244 quater B FTC.

  62. 62.

    Law n° 2012-1509 of 29 December 2012. See article 244 quater C nouveau FTC.

  63. 63.

    Article 220 quaterdecies FTC.

  64. 64.

    Art. 220 terdecies FTC.

  65. 65.

    Tax circular of 21 January 1997 (BOI 13 G-1-97 of 30 January 1997).

  66. 66.

    Art. 81B FTC.

  67. 67.

    Bruno Gibert, Améliorer la sécurité du droit fiscal pour renforcer lattractivité du territoire , Ministère de l’économie, des finances et de l’industrie, Novembre 2004.

  68. 68.

    Article L80B-1° of the Tax Procedures Code (TPC) – Livre des Procédures Fiscales.

  69. 69.

    Article L80B-2°b) TPC.

  70. 70.

    Article L80B-3° and 3bis TPC.

  71. 71.

    Article L80B-4° TPC.

  72. 72.

    Article L80B-5° TPC.

  73. 73.

    Article L80B-6° TPC.

  74. 74.

    Article L64B TPC.

  75. 75.

    Article L80B-7° TPC.

  76. 76.

    See tax circular of 7 September 1999 n° 4 A/1211 on the Advance Pricing Arrangement Procedure (Official Tax Bulletin 4 A-8-99 No. 171 of 17 September 1999).

  77. 77.

    Manual on Transfer Pricing for SMEs, November 2006.

  78. 78.

    Law of 24 May 1951; Law of 14 April 1952; Law of 21 December 1970; Law of 30 December 1981; Law n° 86-824 of 11 July 1986.

  79. 79.

    Decree n° 2013-1193 of 19 December 2013 and Ministerial Circular of 12 December 2013.

  80. 80.

    Article 44 sexies FTC

  81. 81.

    As, for example, hiring local residents or conducting a specific activity.

  82. 82.

    Article 44 octies FTC.

  83. 83.

    Article 44 sexies FTC.

  84. 84.

    Article 44 quindecies and 1465A FTC.

  85. 85.

    Article 44 duodecies FTC.

  86. 86.

    Art. 44 terdecies FTC.

  87. 87.

    Article 44 undecies FTC.

  88. 88.

    See Réponse Decagny, JO AN 30 November 2004 p. 9438 (BF 2/05 n° 110).

  89. 89.

    Article 44 sexies-O FTC.

  90. 90.

    Article 219I FTC as amended by article 11 of the Finances Law for 1993 (n° 92-1376 of 30 December 1992), JORF n° 304 of 31 December 1992, p. 18058.

  91. 91.

    Article 235 ter ZCA du CGI. Contribution at rates of 3.3 % calculated on the standard corporate tax amount (i.e. 3.3 % × 33.33 = 1.1 %).

  92. 92.

    Article 223A FTC (introduced by Finance Law 1988).

  93. 93.

    CJCE, 27 November 2008 aff. C-418/07, Papillon.

  94. 94.

    Article 219 I FTC. Intended for SMEs with at least 75 % of their shares owned, directly or indirectly, by individuals, or for companies satisfying the same conditions with an annual turnover of less than €7,630,000, subject to having fully paid up share capital.

  95. 95.

    Article 39 terdecies and article 219 I FTC.

  96. 96.

    Article 235 ter ZAA FTC.

  97. 97.

    Article 235 ter ZCA FTC.

  98. 98.

    In particular, Regulation (EC) n° 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to de Minimis aid.

  99. 99.

    Article XVI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1947).

  100. 100.

    Cf. Marilyne Sadowsky, Droit de lOMC, droit de lUnion européenne et fiscalité directe, Bruxelles, Larcier, 2013. Kabbaj and Sadowsky, in: Lang (ed.), WTO and Direct Taxation.

  101. 101.

    Article 3 and 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

  102. 102.

    For more details, see Thomas Dubut and Tovony Randriamanalina, ‘French Report’, in: M. Lang (et alii), The Impact of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Taxation (Amsterdam: IBFD) 2016 (forthcoming).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Dubut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubut, T. (2017). Structural and Temporary Tax Mechanisms to Promote Economic Growth and Development in France. In: Brown, K. (eds) Taxation and Development - A Comparative Study. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42157-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42157-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42155-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42157-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics