Abstract
Some studies report that aesthetics of Assistive Technologies (AT) as well as the emotional reactions that occurs when it is observed and used have great impact on stigmatization. In this scope, and based on the fact that the context influences the User Experience (UX) with AT, we are interested in investigate if the context influences the stigmatization of an AT, in particular a traditional wheelchair. It was developed a questionnaire with semantic variables related to aesthetic and emotional reactions, used by 46 university students when interact with two virtual environments with a wheelchair: a garden environment with people and other with the wheelchair only. We did not identify statistically significant differences between the two contexts for emotional and aesthetics variables. This preliminary study points the need to develop more studies related with the influence of the participant population, the characteristics of context and the need to have a narrative to avoid different interpretations of the situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gaffney, C.: An exploration of the stigma associated with the use of assisted devices. socheolas: limerick student. J. Soc. 3(1), 67–77 (2010)
Vaes, K.R.V.: Product stigmaticity: understanding, measuring and managing product-related stigma. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology—Antwerp University (2014)
Parette, P., Scherer, M.J.: Assistive technology use and stigma. Edu. Training Dev. Disabil. 39(3), 217–226 (2004)
Cowan, D., Turner-Smith, A.: The Role of Assistive Technology and Alternative Models of Care for Elderly People. Centre for Rehabilitation and Engineering, Kings College London, London
Sapey, B., Stewart, J., Donaldson, G.: Increases in wheelchair use and perceptions of disablement. Dis. Soc. 20(5), 489–505 (2005)
Toney, A., Mulley, B., Thomas, B.H., Piekarski, W.: Social weight: designing to minimise the social consequences arising from technology use by the mobile professional. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 7, 309–320 (2003)
Gitlin, L.N.: Why older-people accept or reject assistive technology. Gener.-J. Am. Soc. Aging. 19, 41–46 (1995)
Mihailidis, A.G., Fernie, G.: Context-aware assistive devices for older adults with dementia. Gerontechnology 2(2), 173–189 (2002)
International Organization for Standardization.: Ergonomics of human system interaction: Part 210. Human-Centered Design for Interactive Systems (formerly known as 13407) (ISO 9241-210). Geneva, Switzerland (2010)
Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience: a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)
Jacobson, S.: Personalised assistive products: managing stigma and expressing the self. Dissertation. Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Helsinki (2014)
Haghighat, R.: The development of an instrument to measure stigmatization: factor analysis and origin of stigmatization. Eur. J. Psychiat. 19(3) (2005)
King, M., Dinos, S., Shaw, J., Watson, R., Stevens, S., Passetti, F., Weich, S., Stevens, S., Serfaty, M.: The stigma scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness. Br. J. Psychiatry 190, 248–254 (2007)
Shinohara, K., Wobbrock, J.: In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In: CHI 2011—Session: HCI for all. Canada (2011)
Scherer, K.R.: What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc. Sci. Inf. 44(4), 695–729 (2005)
Nagamachi, M.: Kansei Affective Engineering. CRC Press, Florida (2011)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants BEX 10078-13/4 to Luciana Teles Carneiro from CAPES Foundation Ministry of Education of Brazil.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Carneiro, L., Oliveira, T., Noriega, P., Rebelo, F. (2016). Can the Context Stigmatize the Assistive Technology? A Preliminary Study Using Virtual Environments. In: Rebelo, F., Soares, M. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 485. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41983-1_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41983-1_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41982-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41983-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)