Skip to main content

Can the Context Stigmatize the Assistive Technology? A Preliminary Study Using Virtual Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Ergonomics in Design

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 485))

Abstract

Some studies report that aesthetics of Assistive Technologies (AT) as well as the emotional reactions that occurs when it is observed and used have great impact on stigmatization. In this scope, and based on the fact that the context influences the User Experience (UX) with AT, we are interested in investigate if the context influences the stigmatization of an AT, in particular a traditional wheelchair. It was developed a questionnaire with semantic variables related to aesthetic and emotional reactions, used by 46 university students when interact with two virtual environments with a wheelchair: a garden environment with people and other with the wheelchair only. We did not identify statistically significant differences between the two contexts for emotional and aesthetics variables. This preliminary study points the need to develop more studies related with the influence of the participant population, the characteristics of context and the need to have a narrative to avoid different interpretations of the situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gaffney, C.: An exploration of the stigma associated with the use of assisted devices. socheolas: limerick student. J. Soc. 3(1), 67–77 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Vaes, K.R.V.: Product stigmaticity: understanding, measuring and managing product-related stigma. Dissertation, Delft University of Technology—Antwerp University (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parette, P., Scherer, M.J.: Assistive technology use and stigma. Edu. Training Dev. Disabil. 39(3), 217–226 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cowan, D., Turner-Smith, A.: The Role of Assistive Technology and Alternative Models of Care for Elderly People. Centre for Rehabilitation and Engineering, Kings College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sapey, B., Stewart, J., Donaldson, G.: Increases in wheelchair use and perceptions of disablement. Dis. Soc. 20(5), 489–505 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Toney, A., Mulley, B., Thomas, B.H., Piekarski, W.: Social weight: designing to minimise the social consequences arising from technology use by the mobile professional. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 7, 309–320 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gitlin, L.N.: Why older-people accept or reject assistive technology. Gener.-J. Am. Soc. Aging. 19, 41–46 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mihailidis, A.G., Fernie, G.: Context-aware assistive devices for older adults with dementia. Gerontechnology 2(2), 173–189 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Organization for Standardization.: Ergonomics of human system interaction: Part 210. Human-Centered Design for Interactive Systems (formerly known as 13407) (ISO 9241-210). Geneva, Switzerland (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience: a research agenda. Behav. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson, S.: Personalised assistive products: managing stigma and expressing the self. Dissertation. Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Helsinki (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haghighat, R.: The development of an instrument to measure stigmatization: factor analysis and origin of stigmatization. Eur. J. Psychiat. 19(3) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. King, M., Dinos, S., Shaw, J., Watson, R., Stevens, S., Passetti, F., Weich, S., Stevens, S., Serfaty, M.: The stigma scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness. Br. J. Psychiatry 190, 248–254 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shinohara, K., Wobbrock, J.: In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In: CHI 2011—Session: HCI for all. Canada (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scherer, K.R.: What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc. Sci. Inf. 44(4), 695–729 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagamachi, M.: Kansei Affective Engineering. CRC Press, Florida (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants BEX 10078-13/4 to Luciana Teles Carneiro from CAPES Foundation Ministry of Education of Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciana Carneiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Carneiro, L., Oliveira, T., Noriega, P., Rebelo, F. (2016). Can the Context Stigmatize the Assistive Technology? A Preliminary Study Using Virtual Environments. In: Rebelo, F., Soares, M. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 485. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41983-1_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41983-1_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41982-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41983-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics