Using a Mobile Application to Help Visually Impaired Individuals Explore the Outdoors

  • Shelby K. Long
  • Nicole D. Karpinsky
  • Hilal Döner
  • Jeremiah D. Still
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 500)

Abstract

Visually impaired individuals face a variety of challenges when navigating outdoors, including uneven terrain, unexpected obstacles, safety concerns, and reliance on others for information. The goal of this study was to understand further the navigational needs of visually impaired individuals and to develop a mid-fidelity prototype to address these needs. Through interviews with visually impaired users and accessibility professionals, researchers found that present technology leads to an incomplete understanding of the trail and harmful situations. Currently, there is no known technology available that integrates real-time updates with static trail information for individuals navigating outdoors. In response, a mobile prototype was proposed, integrating user-provided updates with static trail information in a format that caters to all users. Our usability testing showed visually impaired users made few errors using the prototype and were satisfied with their experience.

Keywords

Wayfinding Visual impairment Assistive technology 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    National Federation of the Blind. https://nfb.org/blindness-statistics
  3. 3.
    Maguire, M.: Methods to support human-centered design. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 55, 587–634 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hersh, M., Johnson, M.: Mobility: an overview. In: Assistive Technology for Visually Impaired and Blind People (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blasch, B.B., Stuckey, K.A.: Accessibility and mobility of persons who are visually impaired: a historical analysis. J. Vis. Impairment Blindness. 89, 417–422 (1995)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parikh, A., Shah, D., Popat, K., Narla, H.: Blind man stick using programmable interrupt controller (PIC). Procedia Comp. Sci. 45, 558–563 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Edman, P.K.: Tacticle Graphics. AFB Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Götzelmann, T.: Interactive tactile maps for blind people using smartphones? Integrated cameras. In: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 381–385. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamid, N., Edwards, A.: Facilitating route learning using interactive audio-tactile maps for blind and visually impaired people. In: CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 37–42. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faria, J., Lopes, S., Fernandes, H., Martins, P., Barroso, J.: Electronic white cane for blind people navigation assistance. In: World Automation Congress, pp. 1–7 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saaid, M.F., Ismail, I., Noor, M.Z.H.: Radio frequency identification walking stick (RFIWS): a device for the blind. In: 5th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, pp. 250–253. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shoval, S., Ulrich, I., Borenstein, J.: NavBelt and the GuideCane, pp. 9–20. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giudice, N., Legge, G.: Blind navigation and the role of technology. In: The Engineering Handbook of Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence, pp. 479–489 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pawluk, D.T., Adams, R.J., Kitada, R.: Designing haptic assistive technology for individuals who are blind or visually impaired. IEEE Trans. Haptics 8, 258–278 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Capella-McDonnall, M.E.: The need for health promotion for adults who are visually impaired. J. Visual Impairment Blindness 20, 133–145 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Longmuir, P.E., Bar-Or, O.: Factors influencing the physical activity levels of youths with physical and sensory disabilities. Adap. Phys. Act. Quart. 17, 40–53 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rimmer, J.H., Braddock, D.: Health promotion for people with physical, cognitive, and sensory disabilities: an emerging national priority. Am. J. Health Promot. 16, 220–224 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, A.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shelby K. Long
    • 1
  • Nicole D. Karpinsky
    • 1
  • Hilal Döner
    • 2
  • Jeremiah D. Still
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational SciencesMiddle East Technical UniversityÇankaya/AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations