Advertisement

Mission Capabilities—Based Testing for Maintenance Trainers: Ensuring Trainers Support Human Performance

  • Alma M. SorensenEmail author
  • Mark E. Morris
  • Pedro Geliga
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 499)

Abstract

Historically, Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Training Device (TD) testing emphasized meeting performance specification with an insignificant level of attention paid towards mission capabilities-based requirements. Recent research focusing on effectiveness and efficiency of UAS TDs in supporting learning of critical skills has brought mission capabilities-based requirements testing to the forefront. This paper provides a review of the process and results of the MQ-8B Fire Scout Avionics Maintenance Trainer (AMT) MCT event. The Fire Scout AMT MCT event produced qualitative and quantitative data associated with the AMT’s ability to support teaching of tasks/Learning Objectives (LOs) specific to maintenance. The multi-competency test team collected two types of data; one type measuring the capability of TD to provide critical attributes to support each task/LO and the other measuring the capability of TD to facilitate task/LO completion.

Keywords

Training Training devices Mission capabilities Maintenance 

References

  1. 1.
    Bone, E., Bolkcom, C.: Unmanned aerial vehicles: background and issues for congress. Congressional Research Service—The Library of Congress (2003). Retrieved from: http://fas.org/irp/crs/RL31872.pdf
  2. 2.
    Department of the Navy. Project Test Plan Policu and Guide for Testing Air Vehicles, Air Vehicle Weapons, and Air Vehicle Installed Systems Naval Air System Command No. NAVAIRINST 3960.4B) (2005). Retrieved from: http://www.navair.navy.mil/nawcwd/vx31/documents/NAVAIRINST3960_4.pdf
  3. 3.
    Cummings, M.L., Myers, K., Scott, S.D. Proceedings from UVS Canada: Conference on Unmanned Vehicle Systems Canada ’06: Modified Cooper Harper Evaluation Tool for Unmanned Vehicle Displays. Montebello, PQ, Canada (2006). Retrieved from: http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/labs/halab/papers/Cummings2006_uvs_FINAL.pdf
  4. 4.
    Donmez, B., Brzezinski, A. S., Graham, H., Cummings, M.L. Modified Cooper Harper Scales for Assessing Unmanned Vehicle Displays. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Humans and Automation Laboratory (2008). Retrieved from: http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/labs/halab/papers/Metrics_Report_Final.pdf
  5. 5.
    Department of the Navy.: Test Reporting Policy for Air Vehicles, Air Vehicle Weapons, and Air Vehicle Installed Systems (Naval Air System Command No. NAVAIRINST 3905.01) (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alma M. Sorensen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mark E. Morris
    • 1
  • Pedro Geliga
    • 1
  1. 1.Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD)OrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations