Advertisement

Iterative Interface Design for Robot Integration with Tactical Teams

  • K. M. Ibrahim AsifEmail author
  • Cindy L. Bethel
  • Daniel W. Carruth
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 499)

Abstract

This research investigated mobile user interface requirements for robots used in tactical operations and evaluated user responses through an iterative participatory design process. A longitudinal observational study (five sessions across six months) was conducted for the iterative development of robot capabilities and a mobile user interface. Select members of the tactical team wore the mobile interface and performed operations with the robot. After each training an after-action review and feedback was received about the training, the interface, robot capabilities, and desired modifications. Based on the feedback provided, iterative updates were made to the robotic system and the user interface. The field training studies presented difficulties in the interpretation of the responses due to complex interactions and external influences. Iterative designs, observations, and lessons learned are presented related to the integration of robots with tactical teams.

Keywords

Human-robot interaction Mobile user interface Human factors SWAT Robot integration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Starkville City Police for allowing us to work with their SWAT teams. We would also like to thank Zachary Henkel, Christopher Hudson, Lucas Kramer, and Paul Barrett for their support and assistance throughout this project.

References

  1. 1.
    Association, N.T.O.: SWAT standards for law enforcement agencies. NTOA (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Winnefeld, J.A., Kendall, F.: Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap: Fy2013-2038. DIANE Publishing Company (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gonzales, D., Harting, S.: Designing Unmanned Systems with Greater Autonomy: Using a Federated, Partially Open Systems Architecture Approach. RAND Corporation (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murphy, R.: Introduction to AI Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takayama, L., Ju, W., Nass, C.: Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do. In: 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 25–32. (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Woods, D.D., Tittle, J., Feil, M., Roesler, A.: Envisioning human-robot coordination in future operations. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev. 34, 210–218 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schreiner, K.: Operation: microrobot. IEEE Intell. Syst. Their Appl. 14, 5–7 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumagai, J.: Techno cops [police robotic and electronic technology]. IEEE Spectr. 39, 34–39 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yue, L., Qiang, H., Yuancan, H., Liancun, Z., Junyao, G., Ye, T.: A throwable miniature robotic system. In: IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics (ICAL), pp. 114–118. (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen, H.G., Bott, J.P.: Robotics for law enforcement: applications beyond explosive ordnance disposal. In: International Society for Optics and Photonics Enabling Technologies for Law Enforcement, pp. 433–454 (Year)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lundberg, C., Christensen, H.I.: Assessment of man-portable robots for law enforcement agencies. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, pp. 76–83. ACM, Washington, D.C. (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bethel, C.L., Carruth, D., Garrison, T.: Discoveries from integrating robots into SWAT team training exercises. In: IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), pp. 1–8 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krotkov, E., Blitch, J.: The defense advanced research projects agency (DARPA) tactical mobile robotics program. Int. J. Robot. Res. 18, 769–776 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones, H.L., Rock, S.M., Burns, D., Morris, S.: Autonomous robots in swat applications: research, design, and operations challenges. In: Symposium of Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blitch, L.T.C.: Semi-autonomous tactical robots for urban operations. In: Intelligent Control (ISIC). Held Jointly with IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation (CIRA), Intelligent Systems and Semiotics (ISAS), Proceedings, pp. 783–794 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Atrash, A., Kaplow, R., Villemure, J., West, R., Yamani, H., Pineau, J.: Development and validation of a robust speech interface for improved human-robot interaction. Int. J. Social Robot. 1, 345–356 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar, S., Sekmen, A.: Single robot—Multiple human interaction via intelligent user interfaces. Knowl.-Based Syst. 21, 458–465 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lapides, P., Sharlin, E., Sousa, M.C.: Three dimensional tangible user interface for controlling a robotic team. In: 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 343–350 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Waldherr, S., Romero, R., Thrun, S.: A gesture based interface for human-robot interaction. Auton. Robots 9, 151–173Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jentsch, F., Barnes, M., Harris, P.D., Salas, E., Stanton, P.N.A.: Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations. Ashgate Publishing Limited (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walker, A.M., Miller, D.P., Ling, C.: Spatial orientation aware smartphones for tele-operated robot control in military environments: a usability experiment. Proc. Human Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 57, 2027–2031 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Nielsen, J., Molich, R.: Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 249–256. ACM, Seattle, Washington, USA (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. M. Ibrahim Asif
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cindy L. Bethel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel W. Carruth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  2. 2.Center for Advanced Vehicular SystemsMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations