Skip to main content

Identifying Macrocognitive Function Failures from Accident Reports: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Energy: Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Electric Power Industries

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 495))

Abstract

Reliable macrocognitive functions are important for maintaining system safety. Few studies were conducted to investigate macrocognitive function failures in a complex system. NUREG-2114 proposes a cognitive framework connecting macrocognitive function failures, proximate causes, failure mechanisms, and performance influencing factor (PIFs). This model can serve as a model for analyzing human failure events in human reliability analysis (HRA). This study investigated macrocognitive function failures in a complex environment and also examined the usability of the cognitive framework in the HRA qualitative analysis. A total of 103 investigation reports of incidents and accidents from a petrochemical plant in China were involved. It was found that 35 % of the incidents and accidents could be attributed to human errors. Failures of action implementation and team coordination were the dominant failures. This study also gave the information of proximate causes, failure mechanisms, and PIFs for each macrocognitive function failure. The usability issue of the cognitive framework in NUREG-2114 was discussed. It seems that the current cognitive framework needs to be improved to inform HRA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IAEA.: Managing Human Performance to Improve Nuclear Facility Operation. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Griffith, C.D., Mahadevan, S.: Inclusion of fatigue effects in human reliability analysis. Relib. Eng. Syst. Safe. 96, 1437–1447 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, Z., Li, Z.: Summary Reports of Operating Events in Chinese Nuclear Power Plants. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, China (2012). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wiegmann, D.A., Shappell, S.: A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Ashgate, Burlington, VT (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Embrey, D.: SHERPA: a systematic human error reduction and prediction Approach. In: International Topical Meeting on Advances in Human Factors in Nuclear Power System, pp. 184–193. American Nuclear Society, Knoxville (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cacciabue, P.C., Hollnagel, E.: Simulation of cognition: applications. In: Hoc, J.M., Cacciabue, P.C., Hollnagel, E. (eds.) Expertise and Technology: Cognition and Human-Computer Cooperation, pp. 55–73. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klein, G.A., Ross, K.G., Moon, B.M., Klein, D.E., Hoffman, R.R., Hollnagel, E.: Macrocognition. IEEE Intell. Syst. 18, 81–85 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Whaley, A.M., Xing, J., Boring, R.L., Hendrickson, S.M.L., Jeffrey, C.J., Le Blanc K.L.: Cognitive basis for human reliability analysis. NUREG-2114. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xing, J., Presley, M., Parry, G., Forester, J., Hendrickson, S., Dang, V.: An integrated decision-tree human event analysis system (IDHEAS) method for NPP internal at-power operation. Draft Report. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, P., Li, Z.: Human error data collection and comparison with predictions by SPAR-H. Risk Anal. 34, 1706–1719 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nivolianitou, Z., Konstandinidou, M., Michalis, C.: Statistical analysis of major accidents in petrochemical industry notified to the major accident reporting system (MARS). J. Hazard. Mater. 137, 1–7 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kidam, K., Hurme, M.: Statistical analysis of contributors to chemical process accidents. Chem. Eng. Technol. 36, 167–176 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baranzini, D., Christou, M.D.: Human factors data traceability and analysis in the European community’s major accident reporting system. Cogn. Tech. Work 12, 1–12 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, H.-D., Zheng, X.-P.: Characteristics of hazardous chemical accidents in china: a statistical investigation. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 25, 686–693 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghasemi, M., Nasleseraji, J., Hoseinabadi, S., Zare, M.: Application of SHERPA to identify and prevent human errors in control units of petrochemical industry. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergo. 19, 203–209 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, P., Li, Z.: Comparison between conventional and digital nuclear power plant main control rooms: a task complexity perspective, part i: overall results and analysis. Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. 51, 2–9 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lingard, L., Espin, S., Whyte, S., Regehr, G., Baker, G.R., Reznick, R., Bohnen, J., Orser, B., Doran, D., Grober, E.: Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effect. Qual. Saf. Health. Care 13, 330–334 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dai, L., Zhang, L., Li, P., Hu, H., Zou, Y.: Study on human errors in DCS of a nuclear power plant. In: Proceedings of the 12th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSAM12). Honolulu, Hawaii (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71371104.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liu, P., Lyu, X., Qiu, Y., Hu, J., Tong, J., Li, Z. (2017). Identifying Macrocognitive Function Failures from Accident Reports: A Case Study. In: Cetiner, S., Fechtelkotter, P., Legatt, M. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Energy: Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Electric Power Industries. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 495. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41950-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41950-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41949-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41950-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics