Skip to main content

The Impact of Simulation Display on Nuclear Power Plant Task Error Frequencies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors in Energy: Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Electric Power Industries

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 495))

Abstract

This research investigated the impact physical fidelity has on error frequencies when operating a simulated nuclear power plant (NPP) main control room (MCR). The simulated environment used in this study uses dual 24″ monitors and a mouse as its interface, which represents the interface of digital power plants planned to come online. The simulator models an NPP MCR using scroll/pan/zoom (SPZ) to navigate Instrumentation and Control (I&C) panels housed along MCR walls. However, touchscreens can be used to display entire I&C panels, which represents the legacy plants in use today and requires participants to stand to operate in the MCR. A between-subjects experiment was conducted to evaluate desktop and touchscreen interfaces for their impact on response times and error rates when performing reactor operator (RO) tasks. While increased physical fidelity through larger field of view did help reduce response times, using touch induced more miss touch errors than the mouse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Company, G.P.: Thirteenth Semi-annual Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report. 13(29849), https://georgiapower.com/docs/about-energy/13th-VCM-Report-Final.pdf?hp=lnau_box2 (2015)

  2. Slater-Thompson, N.: Nuclear Regulatory Commission resumes license renewals for nuclear power plants (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reinerman-Jones, L., Guznov, S., Mercado, J., D’Agostino, A.: Developing methodology for experimentation using a nuclear power plant simulator, in foundations of augmented cognition, pp. 181–188. Springer. Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corporate, Generic PWR: Control Room Simulator, GSE Systems: http://www.gses.com/wp-content/uploads/GSE-GPWR-brochure.pdf. pp. 1–4 (2015)

  5. Ragan, E.D., Bowman, D.A., Kopper, R., Stinson, C., Scerbo, S., McMahan, R.P.: Effects of field of view and visual complexity on virtual reality training effectiveness for a visual scanning task. Vis. Comput. Graph. IEEE Trans. on. 21(7), 794–807 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts, A., Stanton, N., Fay, D.: The command team experimental test-bed stage 1: Design and build of a submarine command room simulator. Procedia Manuf. 3, 2800–2807 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, F.G., Lin, H., You, M.: Direct-touch vs. mouse input for navigation modes of the web map. Displays 32(5), 261–267 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun, X., Plocher, T., Qu, W.: An empirical study on the smallest comfortable button/icon size on touch screen, in Usability and internationalization. HCI and Culture, Springer. Berlin. pp. 615–621 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgmentss

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored in part by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party’s use, or the results of such use, of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights. The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily those of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Harris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harris, J., Reinerman-Jones, L., Teo, G. (2017). The Impact of Simulation Display on Nuclear Power Plant Task Error Frequencies. In: Cetiner, S., Fechtelkotter, P., Legatt, M. (eds) Advances in Human Factors in Energy: Oil, Gas, Nuclear and Electric Power Industries. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 495. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41950-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41950-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41949-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41950-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics