Understanding the Personality Characteristics of Cybersecurity Competition Participants to Improve the Effectiveness of Competitions as Recruitment Tools

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 501)

Abstract

This paper reports on the results of a survey designed to study the psychological characteristics of a sample of cybersecurity competition participants from Cybersecurity Awareness Week (one of the largest cybersecurity competitions in the USA). By comparing the personality, vocational interests, culture, decision-making style and attachment style between participants who reported their intention to enter cybersecurity careers post-competition and those who did not, we evaluated the effectiveness of cybersecurity competitions as a recruitment tool. Overall, most cybersecurity competition participants tended to be high in openness, rational decision-making style, and investigative interests. Conversely, participants scored lower on neuroticism, intuitive decision-making style, and realistic interests. Individuals’ scores on investigative interests, openness to experience, rational decision-making, and self-efficacy were good predictors of their intention to enter cybersecurity careers post-competition. To increase the influx of people into cybersecurity careers, cybersecurity competitions can be designed to attract more people with these characteristics.

Keywords

Cybersecurity Cybersecurity competitions Career choice Human factors 

References

  1. 1.
    Vigna, G., Borgolte, K., Corbetta, J., Doupe, A., Fratantonio, Y., Invernizzi, L., Kirat, D., Shoshitaishvili, Y.: Ten years of iCTF: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Proceedings of the USENIX Summit on Gaming, Games and Gamification in Security Education (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gavas, E., Memon, N., Britton, D.: Winning cybersecurity one challege at a time. IEEE Secur. Priv. 10, 75–79 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Initiative for Cybersecurity Careers and Studies. https://niccs.us-cert.gov/training/tc/search/cmp/new
  4. 4.
    Information Systems and Audit Control Association. http://www.isaca.org/ pages/cybersecurity-global-status-report.aspx
  5. 5.
    Ash, R.A., Rosenbloom, J.L., Coder, L., Dupont, B.: Personality Characteristics of Established IT Professionals, Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology, pp. 983–989. Idea Group Publishing, Philadelphia (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cruz, S., DaSilva, F.Q., Capretz, L.F.: Forty years of research on personality in software engineering: a mapping study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 46, 94–113 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coleman, G.E.: Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bossler, A.M., Burruss, G.W.: The general theory of crime and computer hacking: low self-control hackers? In: Corporate Hacking and Technology-Driven Crime: Social Dynamics and Implications, pp. 38–67 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheung, R., Cohen, J., Lo, H., Elia, F., Veronica, C.M.: Effectiveness of cybersecurity competitions. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Security & Management. Las Vegas, Nevada (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldberg, L.R.: An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factors. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59, 1216–1230 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis, P., Rivkin, D.: Development of the O*NET Interest Profiler. National Center for O*Net Development, Raleigh, North Carolina (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holland, J.L.: Making Vocational CHOICES: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Triandis, H.C.: Individualism-collectivism and personality. J. Pers. 69, 907–924 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scott, S.G., Bruce, R.A.: Decision-making style: the development and assessment of a new measure. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 55, 818–831 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fraley, R.C., Waller, N.G., Brennan, K.A.: An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 350–365 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tobey, D.H., Pusey, P., Burley, D.L.: Engaging learning on cybersecurity careers: lessons from the launch of the national cyber league. ACM Inroads 5, 53–56 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lent, R.W.: A social cognitive view of career development and counseling. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Low, K.S.D., Yoon, M., Roberts, B.W., Rounds, J.: The stability of interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychol. Bull. 131, 713–737 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roberts, B.W., Walton, K.E., Viechtbauer, W.: Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol. Bull. 132, 1–25 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Library and Information ScienceUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations