Abstract
The robotic-assisted retroperitoneal approach to the kidney and ureter in infants and children is more challenging than the transperitoneal approach. However, once familiar with it, it provides the surgeon with almost the same options as the transperitoneal approach. In addition the risk of damage of intra-abdominal organs is minimal and urine leakage from a ureteric anastomosis is self-limiting. The most important step in the retroperitoneal access is the correct port placement with the camera port 1.5 cm above the iliac spine. The retroperitoneum is dilated with 200–300 mL air through a balloon catheter. The instrument ports are subsequently located medially and laterally at the same level. A 5 mm assistant port in the iliac fossa is optional. The robot is docked from a cranial position. Gerota’s fascia is widely opened in a vertical manner close to the psoas muscle making the kidney falling medially. From this point the procedures do not differ significantly from the transabdominal approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Yeung CK, Tam YH, Sihoe JD, Lee KH, Liu KW. Retroperitoneoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in infants and children. BJU Int. 2001;87(6):509–13. PM:11298045
Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM. Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 2004;171(6 Pt 2):2629–31.
Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience. J Urol. 2007;178(5):2137–41.
Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM. Robotically assisted retroperitoneoscopic heminephrectomy in children: initial clinical results. J Pediatr Urol. 2005;1(2):101–4. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B7GX6-4FJXNBT-3/2/2d7d9e5fdf88408fcc6b7b9738ece73f
Anderberg M, Kockum CC, Arnbjornsson E. Paediatric computer-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy compared with open surgery. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27(7):761–7.
Casale P. Robotic pediatric urology. Curr Urol Rep. 2009;10(2):115–8.
Abuanz S, Game X, Roche JB, Guillotreau J, Mouzin M, Sallusto F, Chaabane W, Malavaud B, Rischmann P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: comparison between retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal approach. Urology. 2010;76(4):877–81.
Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR, Lowe GJ. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children? J Urol. 2007;178(4 Pt 2):1791–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Olsen, L.H. (2017). Retroperitoneal Robotic Procedures. In: Mattioli, G., Petralia, P. (eds) Pediatric Robotic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41863-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41863-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41862-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41863-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)