Bioinformatics Tools in Marine DNA Barcoding

  • Pradosh Mahadani
  • Subrata TrivediEmail author
  • Hasibur Rehman
  • Shalini Saggu


Information science has been applied to manage the information generated in molecular biology to produce the field called Bioinformatics. Application of bioinformatics in several ways is an integral part of DNA barcode research. Since the origin of the DNA barcode concept, three major criteria were set up to test the efficiency of barcode regions. These are (i) Universal Primers to amplify the barcode region (ii) Calculation of Barcode gap (intra and interspecies distance) (iii) Species resolution power. For evaluation of these criteria, DNA barcode community is applying bioinformatics tools and algorithms in primer design, distance calculation, phylogenetic analysis, etc. DNA Barcoding produces a huge amount of Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequences information for species identification from animal kingdom of marine biodiversity. Similarly, Consortium of Barcode of Life (CBOL) plant group proposed plastid genes rbcL and matK either singly or in combination as the standard DNA barcode for plants (CBOL Plant Working Group 2009). ITS of the nuclear ribosomal RNA standardized as the universal barcode marker for fungi. Bioinformatics play a major role in storing of DNA barcode information, and it is easy to retrieve from the database. Software-based sequence quality assurance is main starting and check point for the production of barcode sequences. In this chapter, we discussed different tools and methods of bioinformatics and their proper utilization.


Bioinformatics DNA barcoding COI BLAST 


  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borchsenius F (2007) FastGap 1.0.8. Software.
  3. CBOL Plant Working Group (2009) A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12794–12797PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Felsenstein J (1993) Phylogeny Inference Package (PHYLIP) version 3.5. University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Muller K (2006) Incorporating information from length-mutational events into phylogenetic analysis. Mol Phylogenet Evol 38:667–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Muñoz-Pajares AJ (2013) SIDIER: substitution and indel distances to infer evolutionary relationships. Methods Ecol Evol 4:1195–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ogden TH, Rosenberg MS (2007) How should gaps be treated in parsimony? A comparison of approaches using simulation. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:817–826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: the barcode of life data system. Mol Ecol Notes 355–364.
  10. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method—a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H (2000) Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol 49:369–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Studier JA, Keppler KJ (1988) A note the neighbor-joining algorithm of Satou and Nei. Mol Biol Evol 5(6):729–731PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Young ND, Healy J (2003) GapCoder automates the use of indel characters in phylogenetic analysis. BMC Bioinform 4Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pradosh Mahadani
    • 1
  • Subrata Trivedi
    • 2
    Email author
  • Hasibur Rehman
    • 2
  • Shalini Saggu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsICAR-National Research Center for OrchidsPakyongIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of Sciences, Department of BiologyUniversity of TabukTabukSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations