Abstract
There is a serious problem with arguing that God intended to lock the epistemology of the seventh century into the immutable text of the Qur’an, and then intended to hold Muslims hostage to this epistemological framework for all ages to come. Among other things, this would limit the dynamism and effectiveness of Divine text because the Qur’an would be for ever locked within a knowledge paradigm that is very difficult to retrieve or re-create. The author argues for the recognition of three critical categories in Islamic theology: haqq, hikma and ma‘arifa. While haqq connotes the objective and constant truth, it is not reachable without hikma. Hikma is the balance [mizan] of truths in every historical moment with all of its contingencies. Ma’arifa is the epistemology or the way to searching the objective and constant truth as well as the search for the hikma appropriate for each stage in human consciousness. The author contends that it is contrary to the very nature of a merciful and compassionate God to leave Muslims with a Revelation that is not fully equipped to deal with the altered states of consciousness and perceptions that are inevitable in every stage of human development.
Keywords
This article originally appeared in Philosophy & Social Criticism (vol. 41, Nos. 4–5), pp. 473–486, Copyright © 2015 by (Special Issue: Alessandro Ferrara , Volker Kaul , David Rasmussen (eds.), “The Sources of Pluralism – Metaphysics, Epistemology, Law and Politics. Reset-Dialogues İstanbul Seminars 2014”). Reprinted by Permission of SAGE Publications, Ltd.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abou El Fadl, Khaled. 2001. And god knows the soldiers: The authoritative and authoritarian in Islamic discourses. Lanham: University Press of America.
Abou El Fadl, Khaled. 2003. Speaking in god’s name: Islamic law, authority and women. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
Abou El Fadl, Khaled. 2014. Reasoning with god: Reclaiming Shari‘ah in the modern age. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Al-Bayhaqi, Abu Bakr Ahmad bin Husayn. 2003. al-Jami‘ li-Shu‘ab al-Iman [Branches of Faith]. Riyadh: Maktabat al-Rushd al-Nashir wa al-Tawzi‘.
Al-Jawziyya, Ibn Qayyim. 1988. Fawa’id al-Fara’id. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr [The Benefits].
Eco, Umberto. 1983. The name of the rose. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Ibn Hazm, Abu Muhammad ‘Ali bin Ahmad bin Sa‘id. 1984. al-Ihkam fi Usul al-Ahkam [Exactitude in the Sources of Legal Judgements]. Cairo: Dar al- Hadith.
Izutsu, Toshihiko. 2002. Ethico-religious concepts in the Qur’an. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Makdisi, George. 1982. The rise of Colleges: Institutions of learning in Islam and the West. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tolan, John V. 2002. Saracens: Islam in the medieval European imagination. New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abou El Fadl, K. (2016). The Epistemology of the Truth in Modern Islam. In: Benhabib, S., Kaul, V. (eds) Toward New Democratic Imaginaries - İstanbul Seminars on Islam, Culture and Politics. Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41821-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41821-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41819-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41821-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)