Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competence Modeling and Measurement in Engineering Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education

Abstract

Since the implementation of the Bologna process, there has been more attention to the quality of engineering study courses and to necessity of measuring the extent to which these courses facilitate and support the acquisition of engineering competence of students. So far it is not possible to assess this in a reliable and valid way because of missing models of competence. The foundation of all competence diagnostics is (1) a model of competencies which need to be developed, and (2) the subsequent development and application of adequate test instruments. This chapter proposes a competence model as the basis for an assessment of learning results in mechanical engineering, and places it within the current state of empirical educational research. Hypotheses on the competence structure and on the levels of mechanical engineering students will be derived from the model. The outcome can be used as a step forward for more transparency of the teaching processes and how teaching might be optimized by using the results of assessments.

The focus of the competence model in this chapter is on ‘Cognitive performance’. This precise focus on the concept of competence has been deliberately chosen in order to generate unambiguously measurable learning results. The model is based on content structures of the discipline mechanical engineering and excels by a high affinity for teaching contents as practiced by lecturers, who also participated in the shaping of the model. After the validation of the model, a feedback structure for the improvement of teaching is envisaged in further steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom, s taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biersack, W., Kettner, A., & Schreyer, F. (2007). Fachkräftebedarf: Engpässe, aber noch kein allgemeiner Ingenieurmangel. IAB-Kurzbericht, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, W. (1993). Mathematical modelling in mathematics education and instruction. In T. Breiteig, I. Huntley, & G. Kaiser-Messmer (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in context. New York: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93(1), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erpenbeck, J., & von Rosenstiel, L. (2007). Einführung. In J. Erpenbeck & L. von Rosenstiel (Eds.), Handbuch Kompetenzmessung: erkennen, verstehen und bewerten von Kompetenzen in der betrieblichen, pädagogischen und psychologischen Praxis. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities. (2008). The European qualifications framework of lifelong learning (EQF). Luxembourg: EUR-OP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. (2006). Defining the Australian mechanical engineer. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(4), 471–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Paradise, N. E. (1961). Abilities and learning sets in knowledge acquisition. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 75(14), 1–23. doi:10.1037/h0093826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, M., & Engelhard, G., Jr. (2009). Using paired comparison matrices to estimate parameters of the partial credit Rasch measurement model for rater-mediated assessments. Journal of Applied Measurement, 10(1), 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D., Hauger, W., Schröder, J., Wall, W. A., & Bonet, J. (2011). Engineering mechanics 2: Mechanics of materials. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, J., Klieme, E., & Rauch, D. (2008). The concept of competence in educational contexts. In J. Hartig, E. Klieme, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Assessment of competencies in educational contexts (1st ed., pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497.

  • Heublein, U., Richter, J., Schmelzer, R., & Sommer, D. (2014). Die Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquoten an den deutschen Hochschulen: Statistische Berechnungen auf Basis des Absolventenjahrgangs 2012 (Forum Hochschule No. 4). Hannover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbeler, R. C. (2010). Engineering mechanics – Statics. Singapore: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, D., & Heller, P. (1995). What does the force concept inventory actually measure? Journal of the Physics Teacher. doi:10.1119/1.2344171&prog=normal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. J. (1974). Methodik der Lehrzieldefinition und Lehrstoffanalyse. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koeppen, K., Hartig, J., Klieme, E., & Leutner, D. (2008). Current issues in competence modeling and assessment. Journal of Psychology, 216(2), 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koretz, D. (2008). Test-based educational accountability: Research evidence and implications. Pädagogik, 54(6), 777–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutner, D., Hartig, J., & Jude, N. (2008). Introduction to concepts and questions of assessment in education. In J. Hartig, E. Klieme, & D. Leutner (Eds.), Assessment of competencies in educational contexts (1st ed., pp. 177–192). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liepmann, D., Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Amthauer, R. (2007). I-S-T 2000 R: Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R. Manual (2., erweiterte und überarbeitete Auflage). Göttingen; Bern; Wien; Toronto; Seattle; Oxford; Prag: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musekamp, F., & Pearce, J. (2015). Assessing engineering competencies: The conditions for educational improvement. Studies in Higher Education, 1–20. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1004238.

  • Musekamp, F., Mehrafza, M., Heine, J.-H., Schreiber, B., Saniter, A., & Spöttl, G. (2013). Formatives Assessment fachlicher Kompetenzen von angehenden Ingenieuren: Validierung eines Kompetenzmodells für die Technische Mechanik im Inhaltsbereich Statik. In O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, R. Nickolaus, & K. Beck (Eds.), Kompetenzmodellierung und Kompetenzmessung bei Studierenden der Wirtschaftswissenschaften und der Ingenieurwissenschaften (Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, Vol. 6, pp. 177–193). Landau: VEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musekamp, F., Spöttl, G., Mehrafza, M., Heine, J.-H., & Heene, M. (2014). Modeling of competences for students of engineering mechanics. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 4(1), 4–12. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i1.2917.

  • Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. doi:10.1002/tea.21061.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: A new framework for assessment. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/45/32/33693997.pdf. Accessed 4 July 2014.

  • OECD. (2012). Assessment of higher education learning outcomes AHELO: Feasibility study report, Volume 2. Data analysis and national experiences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., Steif, P., Morgan, J., & Dantzler, J. (2003). Development of a concept inventory for strength of materials. In 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003 (pp. T3D_29). IEEE. Association. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1263342. Accessed 4 July 2014.

  • Schecker, H., & Gerdes, J. (1999). Messung von Konzeptualisierungsfähigkeit in der Mechanik: Zur Aussagekraft des Force Concept Invetory. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 5(1), 75–89. ftp://ftp.rz.uni-kiel.de/pub/ipn/zfdn/1999/Heft1/S.75-89_Schecker_Gerdes_99_H1.pdf. Accessed 4 July 2014.

  • Schmitz, W. (2014). Mehr Ingenieure dank weniger Abbrechern. VDI nachrichten, Nr. 23, 06. Juni 2014, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senkbeil, M., Rost, J., Carstensen, C. H., & Walter, O. (2005). Der nationale Naturwissenschaftstest PISA 2003: Entwicklung und empirische Überprüfung eines zweidimensionalen Facettendesigns. Empirische Pädagogik – Zeitschrift zu Theorie und Praxis erziehungswissenschaftlicher Forschung, 19(2), 166–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spöttl, G., & Musekamp, F. (2009). Berufsstrukturen und Messen beruflicher Kompetenz. Berufsbildung, 63(118), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steif, P. S. (2004). Initial data from a statics concepts inventory. In Proceedings of the 2004, American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, St. Lake City, UT, June, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steif, P. S., & Dantzler, J. A. (2005). A statics concept inventory: Development and psychometric analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 363–371. Association. http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/steif/papers/Statics_Concept_Inventory_Steif_Dantzler.pdf. Accessed 4 July 2014.

  • Steif, P. S., & Dollár, A. (2005). Reinventing the teaching of statics. International Journal of Engineering Education. doi:10.1.1.157.9765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steif, P. S., & Hansen, M. (2006, June). Feeding back results from a statics concept inventory to improve instruction.In Proceedings of the 2006 American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka, G. A., & Macke, G. (2009a). Berufliche Kompetenz: Handeln können, wollen und dürfen: Zur Klärung eines diffusen Begriffs. BWP, 3, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka, G. A., & Macke, G. (2009b). Neue Einsichten in Lehren- Lernen und Kompetenz (ITB-Forschungsberichte, Vol. 40). Bremen: Institut Technik und Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, K., Lalancette, D., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Assessment of higher education learning outcomes AHELO: Feasibility study report, volume 1. Design and implementation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan, J. P., & Tilli, S. (2007). Published research on engineering work. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(4), 300–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VDE. (2005). Ingenieurkompetenzen von Berufseinsteigern: Stellungnahme des VDE Ausschusses “Beruf, Gesellschaft und Technik”, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterton, J. (2009). Competence across Europe: Highest common factor or lowest common denominator? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(8/9), 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Kuhn, C. (2010). Messung akademisch vermittelter Fertigkeiten und Kenntnisse von Studierenden bzw. Hochschulabsolventen: Analyse zum Forschungsstand. Arbeitspapiere WP Nr. 56, Mainz Johannes Gutenberg-Univ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    Georg Spöttl

  2. Institute for Educational Monitoring and Quality Development, Hamburg, Germany

    Frank Musekamp

Authors
  1. Georg Spöttl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frank Musekamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Spöttl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Education and Competence Studies Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Martin Mulder

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spöttl, G., Musekamp, F. (2017). Competence Modeling and Measurement in Engineering Mechanics. In: Mulder, M. (eds) Competence-based Vocational and Professional Education. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41711-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41713-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation