Advertisement

Developing Domains of Occupational Competence: Workplaces and Learner Agency

Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 23)

Abstract

This chapter proposes occupational competence as being cast within three domains of knowledge. These are, firstly, the canonical knowledge of the occupation (i.e. what all occupational practitioners need to know, can do and value). This comprises the domain of occupational capacities required to perform competently in, secondly, particular situations (i.e. situated domain of occupational competence) and, thirdly, the personal domains that individuals come to construct, exercise and utilise to develop further these bases for this occupational performance. Although each of these three interrelated dimensions of domain-specific occupational knowledge should be elaborated, the key focus of this chapter is on the third: personal domains of knowledge. These bases are broadly equated to the generation of expertise within occupational practitioners. The description and discussion advancing these propositions are informed by examples of professional work that are used to delineate these three dimensions of domain-specific knowledge and how the individuals’ expert performance is generated and developed. This consideration of the development of competence is the central focus and contribution of this chapter, which provides some observations for its promotion. Central here is how the development of personal domains of competence is associated with the kind and range of experiences individuals have, how they learn from them and the role played by personal mediation, active mimetic learning and individuals’ personal epistemologies.

Keywords

Occupational Performance Personal Domain Personal Epistemology Occupational Practice Canonical Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barsalou, L. W. (2005). Continuity of the conceptual system across species. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(7), 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billett, S. (1997, November 26–28). Experts’ ways of knowing. Paper presented at the 5th annual international conference on post-compulsory education and training, learning and work: The challenges, surfers paradise travelodge, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Billett, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11(6), 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billett, S. (2003). Sociogeneses, Activity and Ontogeny. Culture and Psychology, 9(2), 133–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billett, S. (2006). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(1), 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billett, S. (2009a). Conceptualizing learning experiences: Contributions and mediations of the social, personal and brute, Mind. Culture and Activity, 16(1), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Billett, S. (2009b). Personal epistemologies, work and learning. Educational Research Review, 4, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education: Purposes, traditions and prospects. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Billett, S. (2014a). Mediating learning at work: Personal mediations of social and brute facts. In C. Harteis, A. Rausch, & J. Seifried (Eds.), Discourses on professional learning: On the boundary between learning and working. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Billett, S. (2014b). Mimetic learning at work: Learning through and across professional working lives. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Billett, S. (2014c). The standing of vocational education: Sources of its societal esteem and implications for its enactment. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 66(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brass, M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: Is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Science, 19(10), 498–495.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruner, J. (2001). Foreword. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. ix–xii). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Byrne, R. W., & Russon, A. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Science, 21(5), 667–721.Google Scholar
  17. Charness, N. (1989). Expertise in chess and bridge. In D. Klahr & K. Kotowsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 183–204). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1982). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Chomsky, N. (1966). Topics in the theory of generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  20. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honour of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale: Erlbaum & Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  22. Dawson, J. (2005). A history of vocation: Tracing a keyword of work, meaning, and moral purpose. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(3), 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  24. Downey, G. (2010). Practice without theory: A neuroanthropological perspective on embodied learning. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (NS)(Supplement 1), S22-40.Google Scholar
  25. Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformations. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltowich, & R. R. Hoffmann (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685–705). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Towards a general theory of expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gardner, H. (2004). What we do & don’t know about learning. Daedalus, 133(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gattis, M., Bekkering, H., & Wohlschlager, A. (1998). When actions are carved at the joints. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(5), 691–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gherardi, S. (2009). Community of practice or practices of a community? In S. Armstrong & C. Fukami (Eds.), The Sage handbook of management learning, education, and development (pp. 514–530). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking – The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gott, S. (1989). Apprenticeship instruction for real-world tasks: The co-ordination of procedures, mental models, and strategies. Review of Research in Education, 15, 97–169.Google Scholar
  34. Grealish, L. (2015). Professional standards in curriculum design:. In S. Kennedy, S. Billett, S. Gherardi, & L. Grealish (Eds.), Practice-based learning in higher education: Jostling cultures (pp. 85–97). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Greeno, J. G. (1989). Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon. Hillsdale: Erlbaum & Associates.Google Scholar
  36. Groen, G. J., & Patel, P. (1988). The relationship between comprehension and reasoning in medical expertise. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & R. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 287–310). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Higgins, C. (2005). Dewey’s conception of vocation: Existential, aesthetic, and educational implications for teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hodkinson, P., Billett, S., & Bloomer, M. (2004). The significance of ontogeny and habitus in constructing theories of learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(1), 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Iacoboni, M. (2005). Neural mechanisms of imitation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15, 632–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kennedy, S., Billett, S., Gherardi, S., & Grealish, L. (Eds.). (2015). Practice-based learning in higher education: Jostling cultures. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Lajoie, S. (2009). Developing professional expertise with a cognitive apprenticeship model: Examples form avionics and medicine. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The development of professional expertise (pp. 61–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning – Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Roche, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 76–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lawrence, J. A., & Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalisation: From transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36, 150–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lodge, R. C. (1947). Plato’s theory of education. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
  47. Malle, B. F., Moses, L. J., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Introduction: The significance of intentionality. In B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2003). What imitation tells us about social cognition: A rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B29(358), 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mulder, M. (2014). Conceptions of professional competence. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (Vol. 1, pp. 107–137). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Learning for jobs. Retrieved from Paris:Google Scholar
  51. Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rehm, M. (1989). Emancipatory vocational education: Pedagogic for the work of individuals and society. Journal of Education, 171(3), 109–123.Google Scholar
  53. Rehm, M. (1990). Vocation as personal calling: A question for education. The Journal of Educational Thought, 24(2), 114–125.Google Scholar
  54. Renkle, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self explanation. Learning and Instruction, 12(5), 529–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking – Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, apprenticeship. In J. W. Wertsch, A. Alvarez, & P. del Rio (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmidt, H. G., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2007). How expertise develops in medicine: Knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Medical Education, 41, 1133–1139.Google Scholar
  58. Scribner, S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 9–40). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Scribner, S. (1985a). Knowledge at work. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 16, 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Scribner, S. (1985b). Vygotsky’s use of history. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 119–145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  62. Silvén, M. (2002). Origins of knowledge: Learning and communication in infancy. Learning and Instruction, 12, 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stevenson, J. (1994). Vocational expertise. In J. Stevenson (Ed.), Cognition at work (pp. 7–34). Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.Google Scholar
  64. Sticht, T. J. (1987). Functional context education. San Diego: Applied Cognitive and Behavioural Science.Google Scholar
  65. Sutherland, L. (2002). Developing problem solving expertise: The impact of instruction in a question analysis strategy. Learning and Instruction, 12, 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sweller, J. (1989). Should problem solving be used as a learning device in mathematics? Journal of Research into Mathematics Education, 20(3), 321–328.Google Scholar
  67. Tigelaar, D. E. H., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2014). Assessment of professional competence. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook on research in professional and practice-based learning (Vol. 2, pp. 1237–1269). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  68. Universities Australia. (2008). A National Internship Scheme: Enhancing the skills and work-readiness of Australian university graduates Retrieved from Canberra:Google Scholar
  69. Valsiner, J. (1994). Bi-directional cultural transmission and constructive sociogenesis. In W. de Graaf & R. Maier (Eds.), Sociogenesis re-examined (pp. 101–134). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  71. Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The social mind: The construction of an idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2002). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 381–419.Google Scholar
  73. Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Tacit knowledge and intelligence in the everyday world. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Practical Intelligence – Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world (pp. 51–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Voices of the mind: A socio-cultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wertsch, J. V., & Tulviste, P. (1992). L. S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 548–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wolcott, H. F. (1982). Mirrors, models, and monitors: Educator adaptations of the ethnographic innovation. In Doing the ethnography of schooling: Educational anthropology in action (pp. 68–95). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith UniversityQueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations