Investigating the Effects of Signal Light Position on Human Workload and Reaction Time in Human-Robot Collaboration Tasks
Critical to a seamless working relationship in human-robot collaborative environments is effective and frequent communication. This study looked to assess whether placing a light source on a robot was more effective for informing the human operator of the status of the robot than conventional human-machine interfaces for industrial system signaling such as light towers. Participants completed an assembly task while monitoring a robot and changes to the light sources: either from one of two light towers or LED strip lights attached to the robot. Workload was assessed by measuring reaction times to light changes and by counting number of completed assemblies. Although both the ANOVA and Friedman tests returned none significant results, total misses per condition showed that the participants did not miss any of the robot lights, whereas signals were missed for the light towers.
KeywordHuman-robot communication Collaboration Human factors Eye tracking
The authors would like to thank John Thrower for his support during the research. This work was supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council as part of the Centre for Innovative manufacturing in Intelligent Automation under the grant reference number EP/1033467/1.
- 1.Fitts, P.M. (ed.): Human engineering for an effective air navigation and traffic control system. National Research Council (1951)Google Scholar
- 3.Unhelkar, V.V., Siu, H.C., Shah. J.A.: Comparative performance of human and mobile robotic assistants in collaborative fetch-and-deliver tasks. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ‘14), pp. 82–89. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
- 5.Sanders, M.S., McCormick, E.J.: Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill, NewYork (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Matthews, G., Davis, D.R., Westerman, S.J., Stammers, R.B.: Human Performance: Cognition, Stress and Individual Differences. Psychology Press, Hove (2000)Google Scholar
- 7.Shinar, D.: Psychology on the Road: The Human Factor in Traffic Safety. Wiley, Chichester (1978)Google Scholar
- 8.Endsley, M.R.: Automation and situation awareness. In: Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M. (eds.) Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications, pp. 163–181. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1996)Google Scholar
- 9.Greif, M.: The Visual Factory: Building Participation through Shared Information. Productivity Press (1991)Google Scholar
- 10.British Standards Institution: BS EN 61310-1 Safety of Machinery. Indication, Marking and Actuation. Requirements for Visual, Acoustic and Tactile Signals (2008)Google Scholar
- 11.Breedlove, S.M., Rosenzweig, M.R., Watson, N.V.: Biological Psychology: An Introduction to Behavioral, Cognitive, and Clinical Neuroscience. Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland (2007)Google Scholar
- 12.British Standards Institution, BS EN 60073: Basic and Safety Principles for Man-Machine Interface, Marking and Identification. Coding Principles for Indicators and Actuators (2002)Google Scholar