Advertisement

Ergonomic Performance Measurement and Evaluation for Worksystems in Healthcare

  • Pradip Kumar RayEmail author
  • Esha Saha
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 482)

Abstract

The principles of ergonomics can be applied to the study and design for the components of any worksystem involving human(s) and machine(s) embedded in environment. As a first step towards exploring the enormous potential and concept of ergonomics at workplaces, many organizations, including healthcare systems, are required to take steps to institutionalize the process of implementing a framework to determine the level of ergonomic performance at their different workplaces. Relevance ergonomics-related factors of performance should be identified and assessed on a regular basis to improve the performance, productivity and reliability of any unit of analysis, and application of the concept of ‘remedial’ ergonomics in many areas, operations and factors of production or service may lead to substantial improvement in overall system performance. This paper highlights the details of an ergonomic performance measurement system developed for a hospital system in India.

Keywords

Ergonomic variables Ergonomic performance Worksystems healthcare systems 

References

  1. 1.
    Ray, P.K., Tewari, V.K.: Design and implementation of ergonomic performance measurement system at a steel plant in India. Work J. Prev. Assess. Rehabil. 41, 5943–5949 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carayon, P., Kianfar, S., Li, Y., Xie, A., Alyousef, B., Wooldridge, A.: A systematic review of mixed methods research on human factors and ergonomics in health care. Appl. Ergon. 51, 291–321 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersen, S.N., Broberg, O.: Participatory ergonomics simulation of hospital work systems: the influence of simulation media on simulation outcome. Appl. Ergon. 51, 331–342 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartnicka, J.: Knowledge-based ergonomic assessment of working conditions in surgical ward—a case study. Saf. Sci. 71, 178–188 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Santos, A.L.R., Wauben, L.S.G.L., Guilavogui, S., Brezet, J.C., Goossens, R., Rosseel, P.M.J.: Safety challenges of medical equipment in nurse anaesthetist training in Haiti. Appl. Ergon. 53, 110–121 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hignett, S.: Embedding ergonomics in hospital culture: top-down and bottom-up strategies. Appl. Ergon. 32, 61–69 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu, X., Thomson, G., Tang, B.: An investigation into the impact of safety features on the ergonomics of surgical scalpels. Appl. Ergon. 40, 424–432 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nelson, A., Matz, M., Chen, F., Siddharthan, K., Lloyd, J., Fragala, G.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted ergonomics program to prevent injuries associated with patient handling tasks. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 43, 717–733 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goyal, N., Jain, N., Rachapalli, V.: Ergonomics in radiology. Clin. Radiol. 64, 119–126 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Serratos-Perez, J.N., Hidalgo-Valadez, C., Negrete-Garcia, M.C.: Ergonomic risks in operating rooms: an unexplored area in Mexico. Procedia Manufact. 3, 67–73 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janowitz, I.L., Gillen, M., Ryan, G., Rempel, D., Trupin, L., Swig, L., Mullen, K., Rugulies, R., Blan, P.D.: Measuring the physical demands of work in hospital settings: design and implementation of an ergonomics assessment. Appl. Ergon. 37, 641–658 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations