Building Safety into Medical Devices: The Non-injectable Arterial Connector Preventing Wrong Route Drug Administration

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 482)

Abstract

A never event is a serious and preventable error in healthcare. Wrong route drug administration into the arterial line can cause significant injury to the patients hand. Analysis of the incident data showed errors occurred during levels of heightened stress when medication was required to be given urgently, however during these circumstances healthcare workers did not seem to recognize the arterial line despite being coloured differently to standard venous lines. By using human factors design principles it was possible to develop a solution which prevents wrong route drug administration into the arterial line and does not interfere with normal clinical practice. We highlight that it was possible to eliminate a serious error in healthcare around the world.

Keywords

Medical devices Human factors systems engineering Serious adverse events Arterial systems Wrong route drug administration 

References

  1. 1.
    Brunicardi, F.C., Anderson, D.K., Billiar, T.R., Hunter, J.G., Matthews, J.B., Pollock, R.E.: 12 Patient safety. In: Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery, 9th edn. The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    An organisation with memory. Report of an expert group on learning from adverse events in the NHS chaired by the Chief Medical Officer. Department of Health (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Building a safer NHS: Implementing an organisation with a memory. Department of Health (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The never events policy framework, an update to the never events policy. Policy 17891, October (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reason, J.: Human error: models and management. BMJ. 320, 768 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Design for patient safety. A system wide design led approach to tackling patient safety in the NHS. The design council. The Department of Healt (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kohn, L.T., Corrigan. J.M., Donaldson, M.S.: To Err Is Human, Building a Safer Health System Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Problems with infusions and sampling from arterial lines. Rapid Response Report. National Patient Safety Agency. NPSA/2008/RRR006 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sen, S., Chini, E.N., Brown, M.J.: Complications after unintentional intra-arterial injection of drugs: risks, outcomes, and management strategies. Mayo Clin. Proc. 80, 783–795 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Problems with infusions and sampling from arterial lines. Supporting information for the Rapid Response Report. National Patient Safety Agency. NPSA/2008/RRR006 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McLean, C.R., Cheng, K.S., Clifton, M.A.: Fatal case of accidental intra-arterial phenytoin injection. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 23, 378–379 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Durie, M., Beckmann, U., Gillies, D.M.: Incidents relating to arterial cannulation as identified in 7,525 reports submitted to the Australian incident monitoring study (AIMS-ICU). Anaes and Inten Care. 30, 60–65 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maryanne Mariyaselvam
    • 1
  • Arun Gupta
    • 2
  • Peter Young
    • 3
  1. 1.The University of Cambridge, Lucy Cavendish CollegeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Cambridge University HospitalsCambridgeUK
  3. 3.The Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Foundation TrustKings LynnUK

Personalised recommendations