Advertisement

Lean Healthcare as a Tool for Improvement: A Case Study in a Clinical Laboratory

  • Karine Borges de OliveiraEmail author
  • Eduardo Ferro dos SantosEmail author
  • Lucio Veraldo Garcia JuniorEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 482)

Abstract

In the current days the health services area presents difficulties in managing processes and staff. High costs, long queues, few qualified professionals, poor services quality and other growing problems in the population’s access to health services. Great part of these difficulties comes from waste in services management and these represent a problem to be solved. Mapping the management processes is a priority involving the services provided by the sector. This paper aims to conduct a study on Lean Healthcare in a clinical laboratory in order to improve its processes management. As a result, it develops a discussion guided by practical results and difficulties from the point of view of concepts of human, quality and process optimization factors, emphasizing also the variable social system under study. Application steps are presented, such as value stream process mapping and improvement opportunities.

Keywords

Lean healthcare Quality management Health services 

References

  1. 1.
    Silberstein, A.C.L.: Um estudo de casos sobre a aplicação de princípios enxutos em serviços de saúde no Brasil. Dissertação (mestrado) em Administração, Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Santos, E.F., Lima, C.A.C.: DMAICR in an ergonomic risks analysis. Work (Reading, MA), vol. 41, pp. 1632–1638 (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graban, M.: Lean Hospitals—Improving Quality, Patient Safety, and Employee Satisfaction. Taylor & Francis Group, Nova Iorque (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., Roos, D.: A máquina que mudou o mundo, 14th ed. Campus, Rio de Janeiro (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holweg, M.: The genealogy of lean production. J. Oper. Manage. V 25, 420–437 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amirahmadi, F., Dalbello, A., Gronseth, D., Mccarthy, J.: Innovations in the Clinical Laboratory: An Overview of Lean Principles in the Laboratory. Mayo Clinic, EUA (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rickard, T.: Lean Principles in Laboratory: Inpatient Phlebotomy. Mayo Clinic, EUA (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T.: A mentalidade enxuta nas empresas, 5th edn. Campus, Rio de Janeiro (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hines, P., Taylor, D.: Going Lean: A Guide to Implementation. Lean Enterprise Research Center, Cardiff (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ohno, T.: Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-scale Production. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shingo, S.A.: Study of the Toyota Production System from an Industrial Engineering Viewpoint. Productivity Press, S.l. (1981)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oliveira, K.B., Santos, E.F., Veraldo Jr, L.G.: Utilização do Lean Thinking como ferramenta para o diagnóstico de perdas na indústria hoteleira: um estudo de caso. Revista Jornada Científica, vol. 1, pp. 19–29 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toussaint, J., Gerard, R.A.: Uma Transformação na Saúde: Como Reduzir Custos e Oferecer um Atendimento Inovador. Bookman, Porto Alegre (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guo, L., Hariharan, S.: Patients are not cars and staff are not robots: impact of differences between manufacturing and clinical operations on process improvement. Know. Process Manage. 19(2), 53–68 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arnheiter, E., Maleyeff, J.: The integration of lean management and six sigma. Total Qual. Manag. 17(1), 5–18 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mendes, M.E. et al.: Gestão por processos no laboratório clínico: uma abordagem prática. Editora EPR (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ismail, A.A.A., et al.: Wrong biochemistry results: two cases reports and observational study in 5310 patients on potentially misleading thyroid-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin immunoassay results. Clin. Chem. 48(11), 2023–2029 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kanashiro-Cussiol, A., et al.: Changes in costs over time at a medium-sized clinical laboratory. Lab. Med. 41(3), 145–146 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Plebani, M.: Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine. Clin. Chim. Acta 404, 16–23 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Plebani, M.: Errors in laboratory medicine and patient safety: the road ahead. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 45(6), 700–707 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hilt, L., et al.: Project control for laboratory automation outsourced to consultants: a 10-step process to optimize the effectiveness of custom information technology development. J Assoc. Lab Autom. 8(1), 31–37 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vieira, L.M.F.: SBPC/ML: 60 anos. J. Bras. Patol. Med. Lab. 40(3), Editorial (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Plebani, M., et al.: Laboratory network of excellence: enhancing patient safety and service effectiveness. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 44(2), 150–160 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buesa, R.J.: Adapting lean to histology laboratories. Ann Diagn. Pathol. 13(5), 322–333 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miguel, P.: Metodologia de Pesquisa em Engenharia de Produção e Gestão e Operações. 1ed. Campus (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro Universitario Salesiano de São Paulo/UNISAL LorenaLorenaBrazil
  2. 2.Engineering School of LorenaUniversity of São PauloLorenaBrazil

Personalised recommendations