Advertisement

Socio-cultural Modeling and Dynamic Decision Making

  • Orélie Desfriches DoriaEmail author
  • Peter Svenmarck
  • Christophe Fagot
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 480)

Abstract

In the field of Cross-Cultural Decision Making, our work is oriented towards supporting decision making process by providing a dynamic and interactive visualisation interface. The idea with this approach is that users should be able to explore a problem space using visualisation that facilitate quick perceptions and understanding. Vesta-Cosy application, developed in the frame of a research project, therefore combines paraconsistent reasoning and works on graphic semiology. We first present the currently used approaches of decision making in Vesta Cosy. Thereafter, the Vesta Cosy application is described in details, especially the different models and their connection with visual and algorithmic units. We also present the theoretical framework which we use for a specific use case scenario. This theoretical framework aims at enabling the consideration of socio-cultural factors in Decision Making.

Keywords

Dynamic decision making Socio-cultural factors Visualisation interface User interaction Modeling Simulation 

References

  1. 1.
    Bertin, J.: Sémiologie graphique: Les diagrammes-Les réseaux-Les cartes, Les Ré-impressions des Editions de l’EHESS (1999), Paris (1973)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bertin, E., Gandrillon, O., Beslon, G., Grauwin, S., Jensen, P., Schabanel, N.: Les complexités: point de vue d’un institut des systèmes complexes. Hermès, La Revue 60, 145–150 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Callon, M.: Actor-network theory—the market test. Sociol. Rev. 47, 181–195 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chateauraynaud, F.: La contrainte argumentative. Les formes de l’argumentation entre cadres délibératifs et puissances d’expression politiques, Revue européenne des sciences sociales XLV-136 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    da Costa, N.C.A., Krause, D., Bueno, O.: Paraconsistent logics and paraconsistency. In: Jacquette, D. (eds.) Philosophy of Logic (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science), pp. 791–912. North-Holland (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Da Silva Filho, J.I.: Treatment of uncertainties with algorithms of the paraconsistent annotated logic. J. Intell. Learn. Syst. Appl. 4(02), 144–153 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Da Silva Filho, J.I., Lambert-Torres, G., Ferrara, L.F.P., Mário, M.C., dos Santos, M.R., Onuki, A.S., Rocco, A.: Paraconsistent algorithm extractor of contradiction effects-paraextrctrctr. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 4(10), 579–584 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donnadieu, G.: Systémique et science des systèmes: quelques repères historiques. Association Française de Systémique (AFSCET). Quelques repères historiques - Afscet (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donnadieu, G., Durand, D., Neel, D., Nunez, E., Saint-Paul, L.: L’Approche systémique: de quoi s’agit-il? L’Approche systémique : de quoi s’agit-il - Afscet (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feigenbaum, E.A., Buchanan, B.G., Lederberg, J.: On generality and problem solving: a case study using the DENDRAL program. Mach. Intell. 6, 165–190. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1971)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoffman, R.R., Lintern, G.: Eliciting and Representing the Knowledge of Experts. Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, pp. 203–222. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein, G.: Naturalistic decision making: implications for design. Klein Associates Inc Fairborn OH (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Klein, G., Klinger, D.: Naturalistic decision making. Human Systems IAC GATEWAY, vol. XI, 3, (1991)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Latour, B.: On actor-network theory: a few clarifications. Soziale Welt. 47(4), 369–381 (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V.: Mental models in reasoning and decision making processes. Mental models in cognitive science, pp. 95–118. Taylor and Francis, Psychology Press, Hove (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Le Moigne, J.L.: La modélisation des systèmes complexes. Bordas, Dunot, Paris (1990)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lipshitz, R., Strauss, O.: Coping with uncertainty: a naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 69(2), 149–163 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morin, E.: Introduction à la pensée complexe. Seuil (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rechtin, E., Maier, M.W.: The Art of Systems Architecting. CRC Press (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwartz, S.H.: An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, vol. 2, issue 1, (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Svenmarck, P., Sjöberg, E., Fagot, C.: A planning tool for interaction with influential actors based on paraconsistent logic. In: AHFE 2016, 27–31 July, 2016, Orlando, Florida (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thévenot, L.: La connaissance dans l’action, L’action au pluriel, Paris, La Découverte, TAP/Politique et société (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thevenot, C., Perret, P.: Le développement du raisonnement dans la résolution de problèmes: l’apport de la théorie des modèles mentaux. Développements 2(2), 49–56 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weick, K.E.: The Social Psychology of Organizing. Adisson Wesley, Reading (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Orélie Desfriches Doria
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter Svenmarck
    • 2
  • Christophe Fagot
    • 3
  1. 1.Ensci-Les AteliersParisFrance
  2. 2.Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI)StockholmSweden
  3. 3.Intactile DesignMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations