Skip to main content

Accurate Quantification of Glandularity and Its Applications with Regard to Breast Radiation Doses and Missed Lesion Rates During Individualized Screening Mammography

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9699))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1836 Accesses

Abstract

Mammography, the most effective early breast cancer detection technique, is associated with the risk of missed lesions in dense breasts, and excessive X-ray exposure. Accurate estimations of glandularity and radiation dose are important during screening. We propose a novel, inexpensive method for accurate glandularity quantification using pixel values in clinical digital mammograms and X-ray exposure spectra. Glandularities were calculated for 314 mammograms in Japanese women, and the Dance formula c-factor was applied to estimate breast doses. To investigate the relationship between breast thickness and missed lesions, images were classified into four categories based on the rate of missed lesions, and correlated with breast thickness. Glandularity decreased with increasing compressed breast thickness, indicating that commonly used breast doses (assumed 50% glandularity) significantly overestimate thin breasts and underestimate thick breasts. The missed lesion rate was higher for thinner compressed breast thicknesses. Accurate glandularity estimation could thus promote individualized screening mammography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Paul, S., Solanki, P.P., Shahi, U.P., Srikrishna, S.: Epidemiological study on breast cancer associated risk factors and screening: practices among women in the holy city of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 16, 8163–8171 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Braithwaite, D., Demb, J., Henderson, L.M.: Optimal breast cancer screening strategies for older women: current perspectives. Clin. Interv. Aging. 11, 111–125 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haddad, F.G., Kourie, H.R., Adib, S.M.: Trends in mammography utilization for breast cancer screening in a Middle-Eastern country: Lebanon 2005–2013. Cancer Epidemiol. 39, 819–824 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jayadevan, R., Armada, M.J., Shaheen, R., Mulcahy, C., Slanetz, P.J.: Optimizing digital mammographic image quality for full-field digital detectors: artifacts encountered during the QC process. Radiographics 35, 2080–2089 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maeda, K., Matsumoto, M., Taniguchi, A.: Compton-scattering measurement of diagnostic X-ray spectrum using high-resolution Schottky CdTe detector. Med. Phys. 32, 1542–1547 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tomal, A., Cunha, D.M., Antoniassi, M., Poletti, M.E.: Response functions of Si(Li), SDD and CdTe detectors for mammographic X-ray spectroscopy. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 70, 1355–1359 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dance, D.R., Skinner, C.L., Young, K.C., Beckett, J.R., Kotre, J.C.: Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3225–3240 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hubbell, J.H., Seltzer, S.M.: Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest. Technology Administration. USGPO Washington, D.C. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peters, G., Jones, C.M., Daniels, K.: Why is microcalcification missed on mammography? J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 57, 32–37 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suzuki, A., Kuriyama, S., Kawai, M., Amari, M., Takeda, M., et al.: Age-specific interval breast cancers in Japan: estimation of the proper sensitivity of screening using a population-based cancer registry. Cancer Sci. 99, 2264–2267 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dance, D.R., Hunt, R.A., Bakic, P.R., Maidment, A.D.A., Sandborg, M., Ullman, G., Carlsson, G.A.: Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 114, 359–363 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dance, D.R., Skinner, C.L., Carlsson, G.A.: Breast dosimetry. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 50, 185–203 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mika Yamamuro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yamamuro, M. et al. (2016). Accurate Quantification of Glandularity and Its Applications with Regard to Breast Radiation Doses and Missed Lesion Rates During Individualized Screening Mammography. In: Tingberg, A., LÃ¥ng, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics