Personalized Crime Location Prediction

  • Mohammad A. Tayebi
  • Uwe Glässer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)


Urban population is expected to grow globally from 2.86 bn in the year 2000 to 4.98 bn by 2030 (, 2004). While we are within this period of large urban growth, policymakers and law enforcement agencies are facing an enormous challenge deploying scarce policing resources more efficiently and effectively. This effectiveness requires a combination of apprehension of criminals, disruption of criminal networks, and the deterrence of crime through crime prevention and reduction strategies.


Random Walk Road Network Activity Space Road Segment Collaborate Filter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    L. Backstrom, J. Leskovec, Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks, in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’11), 2011, pp. 635–644Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Bernasco, Co-offending and the choice of target areas in burglary. J. Investig. Psychol. Offender Profiling 3 (3), 139–155 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Bernasco, Them again? Same-offender involvement in repeat and near repeat burglaries. Eur. J. Criminol. 5 (4), 411–431 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Bernasco, Modeling micro-level crime location choice: Application of the discrete choice framework to crime at places. J. Quant. Criminol. 26 (1), 113–138 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Bernasco, R. Block, Where offenders choose to attack: a discrete choice model of robberies in chicago. Criminology 47 (1), 93–130 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Bernasco, P. Nieuwbeerta, How do residential burglars select target areas? A new approach to the analysis of criminal location choice. Br. J. Criminol. 45 (3), 296–315 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Birks, M. Townsley, A. Stewart, Generative explanations of crime: using simulation to test criminological theory. Criminology 50 (1), 221–254 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.A. Braga, The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 578 (1), 104–125 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.J. Brantingham, P.L. Brantingham, Environmental Criminology (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 1981)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.L. Brantingham, P.J. Brantingham, Nodes, paths and edges: considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 13 (1), 3–28 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.L. Brantingham, P.J. Brantingham, Criminality of place. Eur. J. Crim. Pol. Res. 3 (3), 5–26 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Brockmann, L. Hufnagel, T. Geisel, The scaling laws of human travel. Nature 439 (7075), 462–465 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D.V. Canter, A. Gregory, Identifying the residential location of rapists. J. Forensic Sci. Soc. 34 (3), 169–175 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.R. Chrastil, Neural evidence supports a novel framework for spatial navigation. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20 (2), 208–227 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T.P. Davies, S.R. Bishop, Modelling patterns of burglary on street networks. Crime Sci. 2 (1), Article 10, (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Felson, R. Clarke, Opportunity makes the thief: practical theory form crime prevention. Police Research Series, Article 98 (Home Office, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London, 1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Frank, M.A. Andresen, C. Cheng, P.L. Brantingham, Finding criminal attractors based on offenders’ directionality of crimes, in Proceedings of the 2011 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC’11), 2011, pp. 86–93Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Frank, M.A. Andresen, P.L. Brantingham, Criminal directionality and the structure of urban form. J. Environ. Psychol. 32 (1), 37–42 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Frank, M.A. Andresen, P.L. Brantingham, Visualizing the directional bias in property crime incidents for five canadian municipalities. Can. Geogr./Le Géographe canadien 57 (1), 31–42 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Frank, B. Kinney, How many ways do offenders travel – evaluating the activity paths of offenders, in Proceedings of the 2012 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (EISIC’12), 2012, pp. 99–106Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R.G. Golledge, Misconceptions, misinterpretations, and misrepresentations of behavioral approaches in human geography. Environ. Plan. A 13 (11), 1325–1344 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M.C. Gonzalez, C.A. Hidalgo, A. Barabasi, Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453 (7196), 779–782 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Gorr, R. Harries, Introduction to crime forecasting. Int. J. Forecast. 19 (4), 551–555 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Grimmett, D. Stirzaker, Probability and Random Processes (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. Harries, Mapping Crime Principle and Practice (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC, 1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    S.D. Johnson, Repeat burglary victimisation: a tale of two theories. J. Exp. Criminol. 4 (3), 215–240 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    S.D. Johnson, A brief history of the analysis of crime concentration. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 21 (4–5), 349–370 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S.D. Johnson, W. Bernasco, K.J. Bowers, H. Elffers, J. Ratcliffe, G. Rengert, M. Townsley, Space–time patterns of risk: A cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. J. Quant. Criminol. 23 (3), 201–219 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Kolokolnikov, M. Ward, J. Wei, The stability of steady-state hot-spot patterns for a reaction-diffusion model of urban crime. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 34, 1373–1410 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. Liu, D.E. Brown. Criminal incident prediction using a point-pattern-based density model. Int. J. Forecast. 19 (4), 603–622 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    B. Liu, Y. Fu, Z. Yao, H. Xiong, Learning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation, in Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’13), 2013, pp. 1043–1051Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    B.N. Miller, J.A. Konstan, J. Riedl, Pocketlens: toward a personal recommender system. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22 (3), 437–476 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    L.A.J. Quetelet, A Treatise on Man and the Development of His Faculties (W. and R. Chambers: Edinburgh, 1842)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    N. Rodriguez, A. Bertozzi, Local existence and uniqueness of solutions to a PDE model for criminal behavior. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20 (supp01), 1425–1457 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    D.K. Rossmo, Geographic Profiling (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    D.R. Schaefer, Youth co-offending networks: An investigation of social and spatial effects. Soc. Networks 34 (1), 141–149 (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    L.W. Sherman, P.R. Gartin, M.E. Buerger, Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27 (1), 27–56 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M.B. Short, A.L. Bertozzi, P.J. Brantingham, Nonlinear patterns in urban crime: hotspots, bifurcations, and suppression. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 9 (2), 462–483 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    M.B. Short, P.J. Brantingham, A.L. Bertozzi, G.E. Tita, Dissipation and displacement of hotspots in reaction-diffusion models of crime. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (9), 3961–3965 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M.B. Short, M.R. D’orsogna, V.B. Pasour, G.E. Tita, P.J. Brantingham, A.L. Bertozzi, L.B. Chayes, A statistical model of criminal behavior. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 18 (supp01), 1249–1267 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Song, V. Spicer, P.L. Brantingham, R. Frank, Crime ridges: exploring the relationship between crime attractors and offender movement. in Proceedings of the 2013 European Intelligence And Security Informatics Conference (EISIC’13) (IEEE, New York, 2013), pp. 75–82Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    M.A. Tayebi, R. Frank, U. Glässer, Understanding the link between social and spatial distance in the crime world, in Proceedings of the 20nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS’12), 2012, pp. 550–553Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M.A. Tayebi, M. Ester, U. Glässer, P.L. Brantingham, CrimeTracer: activity space based crime location prediction, in Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM’14), 2014, pp. 472–480Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    M.A. Tayebi, U. Glässer, P.L. Brantingham, Learning where to inspect: location learning for crime prediction, in Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI’15), 2015, pp. 25–30Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    M.A. Tayebi, U. Glässer, M. Ester, P.L. Brantingham, Personalized crime location prediction. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 27, 422–450 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    H. Tong, C. Faloutsos, J. Pan, Fast random walk with restart and its applications, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’06), 2006, pp. 613–622Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    M. Townsley, A. Sidebottom, All offenders are equal but some are more equal than others: variation in journeys to crime between offenders. Criminology 48 (3), 897–917 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    United Nations Settlements Programme: The State of the World’s Cities 2004/2005: Globalization and Urban Culture (2004), Retrieved from
  49. 49.
    H. Wang, M. Terrovitis, N. Mamoulis, Location recommendation in location-based social networks using user check-in data, in Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS’13), 2013, pp. 374–383Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    D.L. Weisburd, E.R. Groff, S.-M. Yang, The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    J.Q. Wilson, G.L. Kelling, Broken windows and police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic 249, 29–38 (1982)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    M. Ye, P. Yin, W. Lee, Location recommendation for location-based social networks, in Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS’10), 2010, pp. 458–461Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad A. Tayebi
    • 1
  • Uwe Glässer
    • 1
  1. 1.Computing ScienceSimon Fraser UniversityBritish ColumbiaCanada

Personalised recommendations