Abstract
In this chapter, I will provide a philosophical commentary on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which will play a key role in global poverty reduction in the next 15 years. In particular, I will focus on five issues: possible trade-offs, the task of prioritization, the vagueness of the SDGs, the required coordination to implement the SDGs and the establishment of a system of sanctions against actors who fail to achieve the SDGs. Firstly, moving forward with measures to realize the SDGs will most likely demand trade-offs between certain goals; therefore, it is urgent to identify which trade-offs are likely to occur and understand how to choose those goals that should be pursued under such circumstances. Secondly, in addition to possible trade-offs, it is likely that some goals are more easy to achieve than others and that states, as well as international institutions, will have to decide where to invest the money. This probably means that some goals will be prioritized over others, with investments focused more on their achievement, at least in the short-term. Thirdly, although the SDGs cover 17 goals with a total of 169 targets, many of them are still very vague. It will be necessary to set measureable and feasible benchmarks, which can be used to track progress. Fourthly, the SDGs are ambitious and, therefore, the possibility that they will not be achieved is, unfortunately, rather high, especially if the vagueness of some of the targets is not exploited in order to achieve at least low levels of progress. Until now, not much is known about the strategies behind achieving the SDGs and how this global effort will be coordinated, as well as whether the current global framework of institutions is fit for that task. Fifthly, it is certain that, if the SDGs fail the poor and other vulnerable populations, there will be no fearful consequence for other populations, particularly those in rich countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Along with much more background information, the goals and targets are explained on the website for the SDGs: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/.
- 2.
The Inter-agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (IAEG-SDGs) of the UN has been working on this matter and has already presented a first list of indicators. They can be found on the website for the IAEG-SDGs: http://unstats.un.org/sdgs/.
- 3.
Vagueness also comes into play for this target when it comes to measuring who falls below the poverty line and who has been pushed above it through policy measures.
- 4.
More information can be found on the Stakeholder Engagement page of the SDGs: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/majorgroups. The UN resolution for the SDGs highlights the importance of partnership and the involvement of all different groups right from the beginning: “We are determined to mobilize the means required to implement this Agenda through a revitalized Global Partnership for Sustainable Development, based on a spirit of strengthened global solidarity, focused in particular on the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable and with the participation of all countries, all stakeholders and all people. The interlinkages and integrated nature of the Sustainable Development Goals are of crucial importance in ensuring that the purpose of the new Agenda is realized. If we realize our ambitions across the full extent of the Agenda, the lives of all will be profoundly improved and our world will be transformed for the better” (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld).
References
Alejandro Leal, Pablo. 2007. Participation: The ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era. Development in Practice 17(4–5): 539–548. doi:10.1080/09614520701469518.
Cammack, Paul. 2004. What the World Bank means by poverty reduction, and why it matters. New Political Economy 9(2): 189–211. doi:10.1080/1356346042000218069.
Cornwall, Andrea, and Karen Brock. 2005. What do buzzwords do for development policy? A critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty Reduction’. Third World Quarterly 26(7): 1043–1060. doi:10.1080/01436590500235603.
Deveaux, Monique. 2015. The global poor as agents of justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 12(2): 125–150.
Dixon, Rosalind, and Martha Nussbaum. 2012. Children’s rights and a capabilities approach: The question of special priority. Cornell Law Review 97: 549–593.
Drydyk, Jay. 2013. Empowerment, agency, and power. Journal of Global Ethics 9(3): 249–262. doi:10.1080/17449626.2013.818374.
Friedman, Eric A. 2016. An independent review and accountability mechanism for the sustainable development goals: The possibilities of a framework convention on global health. Health and Human Rights Journal 18(1). http://www.hhrjournal.org/2016/01/an-independent-review-and-accountability-mechanism-for-the-sustainable-development-goals-the-possibilities-of-a-framework-convention-on-global-health/.
Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. 2016. From the millennium development goals to the sustainable development goals: Shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender & Development 24(1): 43–52. doi:10.1080/13552074.2016.1145895.
Gheaus, Anca. 2013. Care drain as an issue of global gender justice. Ethical Perspectives 20(1): 61–80. doi:10.2143/EP.20.1.2965125.
Güven, Ali Burak. 2012. Exploring paradigm continuity: The IMF, the World Bank, and the global economic crisis. Development and Change 43(4): 869–898. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01781.x.
Hák, Tomáš, Svatava Janoušková, and Bedřich Moldan. 2016. Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators 60: 565–573. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003.
ICSU, and ISSC. 2015. Review of the sustainable development goals: The science perspective. International Council for Science (ICSU). http://resourcecentre.savethechildren.se/sites/default/files/documents/sdg-report.pdf#page=9.
Koggel, Christine M. 2013. A critical analysis of recent work on empowerment: Implications for gender. Journal of Global Ethics 9(3): 263–275. doi:10.1080/17449626.2013.818383.
Langan, Mark. 2015. Budget support and Africa-European union relations: Free market reform and neo-colonialism? European Journal of International Relations 21(1): 101–121. doi:10.1177/1354066113516813.
Langford, Malcolm, Andy Sumner, and Alicia Ely Yamin (eds.). 2013. Millennium development goals and human rights: Past, present, and future, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139410892.
Miller, David. 1999. Principles of social justice, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moellendorf, Darrel. 2014. The moral challenge of dangerous climate change: Values, poverty, and policy, 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pogge, Thomas. 2010. Politics as usual: What lies behind the pro-poor rhetoric. Cambridge/Malden: Polity.
Pogge, Thomas, and Mitu Sengupta. 2015a. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) as drafted: Nice idea, poor execution. Washington International Law Journal 24(3): 571–588.
Pogge, Thomas, and Mitu Sengupta. 2015b. The sustainable development goals: A plan for building a better world? Journal of Global Ethics 11(1): 56–64. doi:10.1080/17449626.2015.1010656.
Pongiglione, Francesca. 2015. The need for a priority structure for the sustainable development goals. Journal of Global Ethics 11(1): 37–42. doi:10.1080/17449626.2014.1001912.
Reuter, Peter (ed.). 2012. Draining development? Controlling flows of illicit funds from developing countries, 1st ed. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Ronzoni, Miriam. 2012. Two conceptions of state sovereignty and their implications for global institutional design. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15(5): 573–591. doi:10.1080/13698230.2012.727306.
Rückert, Arne. 2007. Producing neoliberal hegemony? A neo-gramscian analysis of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) in Nicaragua. Studies in Political Economy 79: 91–118.
Ruggeri Laderchi, Caterina, Ruhi Saith, and Frances Stewart. 2006. Does it matter that we do not agree on the definition of poverty? A comparison of four approaches. In Understanding human well-being, 1st ed, ed. Mark McGillivray and Matthew Clarke, 19–53. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Saith, Ashwani. 2006. From universal values to millennium development goals: Lost in translation: From universal values to MDGs. Development and Change 37(6): 1167–1199. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00518.x.
Singer, Peter. 2010. The life you can save: How to play your part in ending world poverty, 1st ed. London: Picador.
Sustainable Development Solutions Network. 2015. Getting started with the sustainable development goals: A guide for stakeholders. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. http://unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/151211-getting-started-guide-FINAL-PDF-.pdf.
Tangcharoensathien, Viroj, Anne Mills, and Toomas Palu. 2015. Accelerating health equity: The key role of Universal Health Coverage in the sustainable development goals. BMC Medicine 13(1). doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0342-3.
UNCTAD. 2015. World investment report 2015: Reforming international investment governance. Geneva/New York: UNCTAD. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2015_en.pdf.
Vestergaard, Jakob, and Robert H. Wade. 2013. Protecting power: How Western States retain the dominant voice in The World Bank’s Governance. World Development 46: 153–164. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.031.
Wolff, Jonathan, and Avner de-Shalit. 2007. Disadvantage, Oxford political theory, 1st ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Young, Iris Marion. 2011. Responsibility for justice, Oxford political philosophy, 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schweiger, G. (2016). The Sustainable Development Goals: Pitfalls and Challenges Where We Now Need to Start Making Progress. In: Gaisbauer, H., Schweiger, G., Sedmak, C. (eds) Ethical Issues in Poverty Alleviation. Studies in Global Justice, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41430-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41430-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41428-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41430-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)