Advertisement

Affect Channel Model of Evaluation in the Context of Digital Games

  • J. Matias Kivikangas
Chapter
Part of the Socio-Affective Computing book series (SAC, volume 4)

Abstract

Psychological emotion theories are underused in digital game research, possibly because they are divided into several competing camps and because they do not provide a framework easily applied to a context of digital games. I present a first step towards an integration of the camps, especially by combining Panksepp’s view on primary processes, Scherer’s component process model, and Cacioppo and others’ evaluative space model. While specifying the different parts of the affect channel model of evaluation, I discuss how they are likely related to common game-related phenomena.

Keywords

Psychology Emotion theories Evaluations Affect channel Global motivational state Exploration 

References

  1. 1.
    Andrade EB, Cohen JB (2007) On the consumption of negative feelings. J Consum Res 34(3):283–300. doi: 10.1086/519498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrett LF (2013) Psychological construction: the Darwinian approach to the science of emotion. Emot Rev 5(4):379–389. doi: 10.1177/1754073913489753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartsch A, Vorderer P, Mangold R, Viehoff R (2008) Appraisal of emotions in media use: toward a process model of meta-emotion and emotion regulation. Media Psychol 11(1):7–27. doi: 10.1080/15213260701813447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bateman C, Nacke LE (2010) The neurobiology of play. In: Proceedings of the international academic conference on the future of game design and technology pp 1–8. ACMGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brosch T, Sander D (2013) Comment: the appraising brain: towards a neuro-cognitive model of appraisal processes in emotion. Emot Rev 5(2):163–168. doi: 10.1177/1754073912468298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG (1994) Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychol Bull 115(3):401–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caroux L, Isbister K, Le Bigot L, Vibert N (2015) Player–video game interaction: a systematic review of current concepts. Comput Human Behav 48:366–381. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.066
  8. 8.
    Chatfield T (2010) 7 ways games reward the brain [video]. TEDGlobal. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/tom_chatfield_7_ways_games_reward_the_brain#t-966410
  9. 9.
    Cunningham WA, Dunfield KA, Stillman PE (2013) Emotional states from affective dynamics. Emot Rev 5(4):344–355. doi: 10.1177/1754073913489749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangun GR (1998) Cognitive neuroscience. The biology of the mind. W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gentsch K, Grandjean D, Scherer KR (2013) Temporal dynamics of event-related potentials related to goal conduciveness and power appraisals. Psychophysiology 50(10):1010–1022. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12079 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grandjean D, Scherer KR (2008) Unpacking the cognitive architecture of emotion processes. Emotion 8(3):341–351. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.341 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holmes EA, Mathews A (2010) Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders. Clin Psychol Rev. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.001 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horberg EJ, Oveis C, Keltner D, Cohen AB (2009) Disgust and the moralization of purity. J Pers Soc Psychol 97(6):963–976. doi: 10.1037/a0017423 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Izard CE (ed) (2010) On defining emotion [Special section]. Emot Rev 2(4):363–385Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Book. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kivikangas JM, Chanel G, Cowley B, Ekman I, Salminen M, Järvelä S, Ravaja N (2011) A review of the use of psychophysiological methods in game research. J Gaming Virtual Worlds 3(3):181–199. doi: 10.1386/jgvw.3.3.181_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koster R (2013) Theory of fun for game design. O’Reilly Media, Inc., SebastopolGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kurzban R (2010) Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite. Evolution and the modular mind. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lang A (2006) Motivated cognition (LC4MP): the influence of appetitive and aversive activation on the processing of video games. In: Messaris P, Humphreys L (eds) Digital media: transformation in human communication. Peter Lang Publishing, New York, pp 237–256Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    LeDoux JE (2012) Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron 73(5):653–676. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    LeDoux JE (2014) Comment: what’s basic about the brain mechanisms of emotion? Emot Rev 6(4):318–320. doi: 10.1177/1754073914534506 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    LeDoux JE, Phelps EA (2008) Emotional networks in the brain. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF (eds) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. Guilford Press, New York, pp 159–179Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lillard A (1993) Pretend play skills and the child’s theory of mind. Child Dev. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02914.x/full
  25. 25.
    Mandryk RL, Atkins M (2007) A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play technologies. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 65(4):329–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martínez H, Yannakakis GN (2011) Analysing the relevance of experience partitions to the prediction of players’ self-reports of affect. In: Affective computing and intelligent interaction, part II, LNCS 6975, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 538–546Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Montola M (2011) The painful art of extreme role-playing. J Gaming Virtual Worlds 3(3):219–237Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Munroe R (2011) Standards. Retrieved from http://xkcd.com/927/
  29. 29.
    Norman GJ, Norris CJ, Gollan J, Ito TA, Hawkley LC, Larsen JT, … Berntson GG (2011) Current emotion research in psychophysiology: the neurobiology of evaluative bivalence. Emot Rev 3(3):349–359. doi: 10.1177/1754073911402403
  30. 30.
    Norris CJ, Gollan J, Berntson G, Cacioppo JT (2010) The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space. Biol Psychol 84(3):422–436CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Panerai AE (2011) Pain emotion and homeostasis. Neurol Sci: Off J Ital Neurol Soc Ital Soc Clin Neurophysiol 32(Suppl 1):S27–S29. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0540-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Panksepp J, Biven L (2012) The archaeology of mind: neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions (Norton series on interpersonal neurobiology). W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peifer C (2012) Psychophysiological correlates of flow-experience. Adv Flow Res:139–164. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_8
  34. 34.
    Poels K, van den Hoogen W, IJsselsteijn WA, de Kort YAW (2012) Pleasure to play, arousal to stay: the effect of player emotions on digital game preferences and playing time. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 15(1):1–6. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0040 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Russell JA (2003) Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev 110(1):145–172. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Russell JA (2009) Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognit Emot 23(7):1259–1283. doi: 10.1080/02699930902809375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Russell JA (ed) (2012) On defining emotion [Special section]. Emot Rev 4(4):337–393Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Scherer KR (2001) Appraisal considered as a process of multi-level sequential checking. In: Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T (eds) Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 92–120Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scherer KR (2009) The dynamic architecture of emotion: evidence for the component process model. Cognit Emot 23(7):1307–1351. doi: 10.1080/02699930902928969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scherer KR (2013) The nature and dynamics of relevance and valence appraisals: theoretical advances and recent evidence. Emot Rev 5(2):150–162. doi: 10.1177/1754073912468166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T (2001) In: Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T (eds) Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press, CanaryGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stenros J (2014) In defence of a magic circle: the social, mental and cultural boundaries of play. Trans Digit Games Res Assoc 1(2):147–185Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tooby J, Cosmides L (2008) The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables. In: Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF (eds) Handbook of emotions, 3rd edn. Guilford Press, New York, pp 114–137Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information and Service EconomyAalto UniversityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations