Advertisement

The Aesthetic Motives of Play

  • Chris Bateman
Chapter
Part of the Socio-Affective Computing book series (SAC, volume 4)

Abstract

Why do people enjoy playing games? The answer, in its most general form, is that there are aesthetic pleasures offered by games and other play experiences that meet powerful and profound human and animal needs. As such, we can identify specific aesthetic motives of play, and one of the clearest ways of characterizing these motives is in terms of the emotional experiences associated with them.

Keywords

Play Motive Uncertainty Game Social motive Aesthetic motive Curiosity Problem-solving Narrative Agency 

References

  1. 1.
    Bateman C (2014) Implicit game aesthetics. Games and Culture. Available online: http://gac.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/12/11/1555412014560607.abstract. Accessed 10 Mar 2015, Article published online before print
  2. 2.
    Bartle R (1996) Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: players who suit MUDs. J MUD Res 1(1). [online] http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm. Accessed 5 Mar 2015
  3. 3.
    Bateman C, Boon R (2005) 21st century game design. Charles River Media, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lazzaro N (2003) Why we play: affect and the fun of games. In: Sears A, Jacko JA (eds) The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, New York, pp 679–700Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caillois R (1958) Man, play and games (trans: Barash M [1962]). Thames & Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bateman C (2009) Understand patterns of play. In: Bateman C (ed) Beyond game design: nine steps towards creating better videogames. Charles River, Boston, pp 61–116Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bateman C, Lowenhaupt R, Nacke LE (2011) Player typology in theory and practice. Proceedings of DiGRA 2011 Conference: Think Design Play, Utrecht, Netherlands (Sept). Available online: http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/11307.50587.pdf
  8. 8.
    Sutton-Smith B (1997) The ambiguity of play. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bateman C (2014) Empirical game aesthetics. In: Angelides MC, Agius H (eds) IEEE handbook of digital games. Wiley-IEEE Press, New York, pp 411–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffin C (2003) The advantages and limitations of qualitative research in psychology and education. Sci Ann Psychol Soc North Greece 2:3–15Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whitehead AN (1925/1967) Science and the modern world. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiner B (1986) An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walton KL (2007) Aesthetics – What? Why? and Wherefore? J Aesthet Art Crit 65(2):147–161, Spring 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cahan D (ed) (2003) From natural philosophy to the sciences: writing the history of nineteenth-century science. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bateman C (2011) Imaginary games. Zero Books, WinchesterGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bateman C (2015) A disavowal of games. Proceedings of the second Philosophy at Play Conference, University of Glocestershire (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bateman C (2012) The mythology of evolution. Zero Books, WinchesterGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith PK (1982) Does play matter? Functional and evolutionary aspects of animal and human play. Behav Brain Sci 5(1):139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malaby TM (2009) Anthropology and play: the contours of playful experience. New Lit Hist 40(1):205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suits B (1978) The grasshopper: games, life and utopia. Scottish Academic Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suits B (1966) What is a game? Philos Sci 34(2):148–156, JuneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huizinga J (1949) Homo Ludens : a study of the play-element in our culture (trans: Hull RFC). Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bateman C (2015) Fiction denial and the liberation of games. Ab extra paper at DiGRA 2015Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bateman C (2014) What are we playing with? Role-taking, role-play, and story-play with Tolkien’s legendarium. Int J Play 3(2):107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Juul J (2005) Half-real, video games between real rules and fictional worlds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walton KL (1990) Mimesis as make-believe: on the foundations of the representational arts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Button SB, Mathieu JE, Zajac DM (1996) Goal orientation in organizational research: a conceptual and empirical foundation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 67(1):26–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lazzaro N (2009) Understand emotions. In: Bateman C (ed) Beyond game design: nine steps towards creating better videogames. Charles River Media, BostonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ekman P (2003) Emotions revealed. Times Books Henry Holt and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Whitman W (1855/2008) “Song of Myself”, leaves of grass. Digireads.com, New York, pp 19–63Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Andrew RJ, Rogers LJ (1972) Testosterone, search behaviour and persistence. Nature 237(5354):343–346, JuneCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Booth A, Shelley G, Mazur A, Tharp G, Kittok R (1989) Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition. Horm Behaviour 23(4):556–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Elias M (1981) Serum cortisol, testosterone, and testosterone-binding globulin responses to competitive fighting in human males. Aggress Behav 7(3):215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cashmore E (2002) Sport psychology: the key concepts. Psychology Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Moscovich I (2004) The shoelace problem and other puzzles. Sterling Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Clark FE, Smith LJ (2013) Effect of a cognitive challenge device containing food and non-food rewards on chimpanzee well-being. Am J Primatol 73:807–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jelbert SA, Taylor AH, Cheke LG, Clayton NS, Gray RD (2014) Using the Aesop’s fable paradigm to investigate causal understanding of water displacement by New Caledonian crows. PLoS ONE 9(3):e92895, available online: http://journals.plos.org/ plosone/article?id= 10.1371/journal.pone.0092895. Accessed 2 Mar 2015
  40. 40.
    Danesi M (2004) The puzzle instinct: the meaning of puzzles in human life. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Plutchik R (1994) The psychology and biology of emotion. HarperCollins College Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ekman P (1992) An argument for basic emotions. Cognit Emot 6(3–4):169–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bateman C (2009) Include players with different skills. In: Bateman C (ed) Beyond game design: nine steps towards creating better videogames. Charles River Media, Boston, pp 189–212Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yee N (2006) The demographics, motivations, and derived experiences of users of massively multi-user online graphical environments. Presence Teleop Virt 15(3):309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Malone TW (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cogn Sci 5(4):333–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nacke LE, Bateman C, Mandryk RL (2011) BrainHex: preliminary results from a neurobiological gamer typology survey. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Entertainment Computing (ICEC 2011). Vancouver, pp 288–293Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dally JM, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2005) Cache protection strategies by western scrub-jays, Aphelocoma californica: implications for social cognition. Anim Behav 70(6):1251–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Endler JA (2012) Bowerbirds, art and aesthetics: are bowerbirds artists and do they have an aesthetic sense? Commun Integr Biol 5(3):281–283CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mitchell J (1959) The bottom of the harbor. Pantheon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hughes J (1991) New directions in Australian roleplaying: style and innovation in roleplaying design. Second Roleplaying Forum, Sydney (July). Available online: http://myth-o-logic.org/systemless-roleplaying/1086-2/. Accessed 9 Mar 2015
  52. 52.
    Burghardt GM (2005) The genesis of animal play: testing the limits. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kuo ZY (1960) Studies on the basic factors in animal fighting: VII. Inter-species coexistence in mammals. J Genet Psychol 97:211–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    van Leengoed E, Kerker E, Swanson H (1987) Inhibition of post-partum maternal behavior in the rat by injecting an oxytocin antagonist into the cerebral ventricles. J Endocrinol 112(2):275–282, FebruaryCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Baumgartner T, Heinrichs M, Vonlanthen A, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2008) Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron 58(4):639–650, MayCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nagasawa M, Kikusui T, Onaka T, Ohta M (2009) Dog’s gaze at its owner increases owner’s urinary oxytocin during social interaction. Horm Behav 55:434–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Handlin L, Hydbring-Sandberg E, Nilsson A, Ejdebäck M, Jansson A, Uvnäs-Moberg K (2011) Short-term interaction between dogs and their owners: effects on oxytocin, cortisol, insulin and heart rate. An explorative study. Anthrozoös 24:301–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Beetz A, Uvnäs-Moberg K, Julius H, Kotrschal K (2012) Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: the possible role of oxytocin. Front Psychol 3:234PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Goodson JL, Schrock SE, Klatt JD, Kabelik D, Kingsbury MA (2009) Mesotocin and nonapeptide receptors promote songbird flocking behavior. Science 325:862–866CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Frijda NH (1986) The emotions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Liang ZS, Nguyen T, Mattila HR, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Seeley TD, Robinson GE (2012) Molecular determinants of scouting behavior in honey bees. Science 335(6073):1225–1228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bateman C (2005) Portrait of a type 3 wanderer. Only a Game. Available online: http://onlyagame.typepad.com/only_a_game/2005/09/portrait_of_a_t.html. Accessed 9 Mar 2015
  63. 63.
    Biederman I, Vessel EA (2006) Perceptual pleasure and the brain. Am Sci 94:247–253, May-JuneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yue X, Vessel EA, Biederman I (2007) The neural basis of scene preferences. NeuroReport 18(6):525–529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Malone TW (1980) What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL symposium and the first SIGPC symposium on Small systems. pp 162–169Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Malone TW (1981) Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: lessons from computer games. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (CHI). pp 63–68Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Berlyne DE (1955) The arousal and satiation of perceptual curiosity in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 48(4):238–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Heinrich B (1999) Mind of the raven: investigations and adventures with wolf-birds. HarperCollins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kuba MJ, Byrne RA, Meisel DV, Mather JA (2006) When do octopuses play? Effects of repeated testing, object type, age, and food deprivation on object play in octopus vulgaris. J Comp Psychol 120(3):184–190, AugCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lehrer J (2011) Why does beauty exist? Wired. Available online: http://aminotes.tumblr.com/post/10845779320/why-does-beauty-exist-jonah-lehrer-beauty-is-a. Accessed 9 Mar 2015
  71. 71.
    Ishizu T, Zeki S (2011) Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. PLoS ONE 6(7):e21852, available online: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id= 10.1371/journal.pone.0021852. Accessed 9 Mar 2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bateman C (2014) Chaos ethics. Zero Books, WinchesterGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Silvia PJ (2014) Interest – the curious emotion. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 17(1):57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Green MC, Brock TC, Kaufman GF (2006) Understanding media enjoyment: the role of transportation into narrative worlds. Commun Theory 14(4):311–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Aristotle (335 BC) Poetics (trans: Butcher SH). Internet Classics Archive. Available online: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/poetics.mb.txt. Accessed 9 Mar 2015.
  76. 76.
    Campbell J (1949) The hero with a thousand faces. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Vogler C (2007) The writer’s journey: mythic structure for storytellers and screenwriters. Michael Wiese Productions, Studio CityGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Curry G, Ravenscroft I (2002) Recreative minds: imagination in philosophy and psychology. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Carroll N (1990) The philosophy of horror; or, paradoxes of the heart. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Andrade EB, Cohen JB (2007) On the consumption of negative feelings. J Consum Res 34:283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Walton KL (1978) Fearing fictions. J Philos 75(1):5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gaut B (2003) Reasons, emotions and fictions. In: Kieran M, McIver Lopes D (eds) Imagination, philosophy, and the arts. Routledge, London, pp 15–34Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bateman C (2014) Am I afraid of daleks? Quasi-fear as alief. Working paper. University of BoltonGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gendler TS (2008) Alief and belief. J Philos 105(10):634–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Gendler TS (2008) Alief and belief in action (and reaction). Mind Lang 23(5):552–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Markström AM, Halldén G (2009) Children’s strategies for agency in preschool. Child Soc 23(2):112–122, MarchCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Frasca G (2001) Rethinking agency and immersion: video games as a means of consciousness-raising. Digit Creat 12(3):167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Punday D (2005) Creative accounting: role-playing games, possible-world theory, and the agency of imagination. Poet Today 26(1):113–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Harrell DF, Zhu J (2008) Agency play: dimensions of agency for interactive narrative design. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2008 spring symposium on interactive narrative technologies II. Stanford, pp 156–162Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Wardrip-Fruin N, Mateas M, Dow S, Sali S (2009) Agency reconsidered. Proceedings of DiGRA International Conference: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. Available online: http://www.digra.org/digital-library/publications/agency-reconsidered/. Accessed 10 Mar 2015
  91. 91.
    Tanenbaum K, Tanenbaum J (2010) Agency as commitment to meaning: communicative competence in games. Digital Creativity 21(1):11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Fredricksen E (2002) Progress quest [PC videoame], self-distributedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Midgley M (1974) The game game. Philosophy 49(189):231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Marcel AJ (2003) The sense of agency: awareness and ownership of action. In: Roessler J, Eilan N (eds) Agency and self-awareness. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 48–93Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sen A (1985) Well-being, agency and freedom: the Dewey lectures 1984. J Philos 82(4):169–221, AprilGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Hribal JC (2007) Animals, agency, and class: writing the history of animals from below. Hum Ecol Rev 14(1):101–112Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    MacIntyre A (1999) Dependent rational animals: why human beings need the virtues. Gerald Duckworth and co., LondonGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    McFarland SE, Hediger R (2009) Animals and agency: an interdisciplinary exploration. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Persson M (2009) Minecraft [PC videogame], self-distributedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Tale of Tales (2005) The endless forest [PC videogame], self-distributedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Tale of Tales (2012) Bientôt L’été [PC videogame], self-distributedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Team Ico (2005) Shadow of the colossus [PS2 videogame]. Sony Computer Entertainment, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Arika (2007) Endless ocean [Wii videogame]. Nintendo, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Kant I (1790/2005) Critique of judgment (trans: Bernard JH). Dover Publications, MineolaGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Newman J (2008) Playing with videogames, chapter 6. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Parker F (2008) The significance of jeep tag: on player-imposed rules in video games. Loading…, pp 1–3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Bateman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BoltonBoltonUK
  2. 2.International HoboManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations