Skip to main content

The Role of Selected Agroforestry Trees in Temperature Adaptation on Coffea arabica: A Case Study of the Moshi District, Tanzania

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change and Multi-Dimensional Sustainability in African Agriculture

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the soil and air temperature levels of dominant tree species in agroforestry systems that influence Coffea arabica productivity. A purposive sampling technique was employed to select villages and farms from different agroecological zones. The data collection methods included questionnaires and focus groups with key informants. Soil and air temperatures were measured using temperature sensors. General linear models in SAS were employed to analyze the temperature data and Statistical Package for Social Science for socio economic data. Dominant tree species included Grevillea robusta, Albizia schimperiana and Rauvolfia caffra. There was a significant difference in soil and air temperature regulation among tree species in the midland (p < 0.05), with mean temperature differences of 0.5–1.6 and 0.2–0.4 °C for soil and air temperature, respectively. G. robusta significantly regulates soil and air temperature in both highland and midland zones (p < 0.05) compared to the other studied tree species that had mean temperature differences of 0.2–1.6 and 0.3–0.4 °C for soil and air temperature, respectively. Since moderate temperature favours Coffee productivity, G. robusta is recommended in both the midland and highlands; however, it is imperative to investigate how the soil impacted by G. robusta affects coffee productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbari H, Taha H (1992) The impact of trees and white surfaces on residential heating and cooling energy use in four Canadiancities. Energy 17(2):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albertin A, Nair PKR (2004) Farmers perspective on the role of shade trees in coffee production systems:an assessment from the Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. Human Ecology 32:443

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in coffee and cacaoplantations. Agrofor Syst 38:139–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramori PH, Leal AC, Morais H (2004) Microclimatic characterization and productivity of coffee plants grown under shade of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) in Southern Brazil. Agrofor Syst 63:75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daldo (2011) District agricultural and livestock development plans. Moshi District Council, Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania, 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Doering OC (2002) Effects of climate change and variability on agricultural production systems. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gommes R (2002) Environment, climate change and bioenergy division. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (2008) Transforming lives and landscapes. ICRAF strategy 2008–2015. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya, 48

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. In: Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 688

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayunze KA (2003) Social science research methods. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd CV, Pimentel D (1992) Integrated resource management in agroforestry for development. Academic Press, San Diego, p 233

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari CR (1990) Research methodology: methods and techniques, 2nd edn. New Age International (P) Limited Publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB (2007) Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potentialmicroclimate extremes in coffee agriculture. Agric For Met 144:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008) Synergies between agricultural intensification and climate change could create surprising vulnerabilities for crops. Bioscience 58:847–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott JE, Ong CK, Black CR (2009) Understorey microclimate and crop performance in a Grevillea robusta-based agroforestry system in semi-arid Kenya. Agric For Meteorol 149:1140–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhando DG, Haller T, Mbeyale G, Ludi E (2013) Adaptation to changes in the coffee value chain and the price of coffee among coffee producers in two villages in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Afr Study Monogr 34(1):27–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthuri CW (2004) Impact of agroforestry on crop performance and water resources in semi-arid central Kenya. Ph.D. thesis, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya, 292

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogunkunle CO, Awotoye OO (2011) Soil fertility under different tree cropping system in a southwestern zone of Nigeria. Not Sci Biol 3:123–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao KPC, Verchot VL, Laarman J (2007) Adaptation to climate change through sustainable management and development of agroforestry systems. World Agroforestry Center, Nairobi, Kenya. An Open Access Journal published by ICRISAT

    Google Scholar 

  • Shashua-Bar L, Hoffman ME (2000) Vegetation as a climatic component in the design of an Urban Street: an empirical model for predicting the cooling effect of urban green areas with trees. Energy Build 31(3):221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton R, Straits B, Straits M (1993) Approaches to social research. Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soini E (2006) Bird diversity and land use on the slopes of Mt. Kilimanjaro and the adjacent Plains, Tanzania. ICRAF Working Paper No. 11. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Pinto L, Villalvazo-López V, Jiménez-Ferrer G, Ramírez-Marcial N, Montoya G (2007) Multistrata coffee systemsin Chiapas, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 16:419–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzania Coffee Board (2012) Coffee industry development strategy 2011–2021. [http://www.coffeeboard.or.tz/News_publications/startegy_english.pdf]. Retrieved on 10 February, 2016

  • United Republic of Tanzania (URT) (2003) The 2002 Population and Housing Census, Central Census Office, National Bureau of Statistics, President’s Office, Planning and Privatization, Dar es salaam. [http://www.Tanzania.go.tz/census/regions.tm] site visited on 16/3/2012

  • URT (2002) Coffee Industry Act. Government Printer, Dar Es Salaam. 2012. Macro economic policy framework for five-year development plan/budget 2012/13–2015/16. Ministry of Finance, Government Printer, Dar Es Salaam

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M, Hoang MH, Neufeldt H, Öborn I, Yatich T (2011) How trees and people can co-adapt to climate change: reducing vulnerability through multifunctional agroforestry landscapes. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Verchot LV, Van Noordwijk M, Kandji S, Tomich T, Ong C, Albrecht A, Palm C (2007) Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 12(5):901–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson TD, Brook RM, Tomlinson HF (1997). Interactions between NERE (PARKIA BIGLOBOSA) and under-planted sorghum in a Parkland system In: BURKINA FASO Expl Agric (1998), vol 34, pp 85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Zongolo SA, Kiluvia S, Mghase G (2000) UmbweOnana PRA report. Traditional Irrigation and Environmental Development Organization, Moshi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline Kajembe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kajembe, J., Lupala, I., Kajembe, G., Mugasha, W., Nuru, F. (2016). The Role of Selected Agroforestry Trees in Temperature Adaptation on Coffea arabica: A Case Study of the Moshi District, Tanzania. In: Lal, R., Kraybill, D., Hansen, D., Singh, B., Mosogoya, T., Eik, L. (eds) Climate Change and Multi-Dimensional Sustainability in African Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41238-2_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics