Skip to main content

A Deep Dive into Extreme Television Media Selection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Extreme Media and American Politics
  • 369 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the reasons behind extreme media selection under an “information search” condition. Using mainstream and extreme media content, subjects were prompted to select the media choice they believed would give them the “best information to make their political choices.” Predictors of media selection are replicated here, but Taylor turns to qualitative process tracing to study why people make their media choices and how they feel about those choices afterward. Taylor finds that people selecting into extreme media are entertainment seeking, and that subjects who viewed extreme media found it more entertaining than people who selected into mainstream television news. This chapter deepens our understanding of extreme media selection, and shows that extreme media are an extension of the “infotainment” format television.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, Alan. 2011. Partisan Polarization and the Rise of the Tea Party Movement. Paper Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arceneaux, Kevin, and Martin Johnson. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels?: Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Matthew A. 2003a. Soft News and Political Knowledge: Evidence of Absence or Absence of Evidence? Political Communication 20: 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003b. Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Matthew A., and Angela S. Jamison. 2006. The Oprah Effect: How Soft News Helps Inattentive Citizens Vote Consistently. The Journal of Politics 68: 946–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Jody, and Jonathan S. Morris. 2006. The Daily Show Effect: Candidate Evaluations, Efficacy, and American Youth. American Politics Research 34(3): 341–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance, and Shanto Iyengar. 2008. A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication 58(4): 707–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, Bernard, Paul F. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Jeffery M., and Sarah Sobieraj. 2011. Understanding the Rise of Talk Radio. PS: Political Science & Politics 44: 762–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Jeffrey M., and Sarah Sobieraj. 2013. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilliplane, Susanna. 2011. All the News You Want to Hear: The Impact of Partisan News Exposure on Political Participation. Public Opinion Quarterly 75: 287–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Activation, Conversion, or Reinforcement? The Impact of Partisan News Exposure on Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science 58(January): 79–94. doi:10.1111/ajps.12046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, Doris. 1988. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York, NY: Longman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Mediated Politics and Citizenship in the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 545–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, James T. 2004. All the News That’s Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information Into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Shanto, Kyu S. Hahn, Jon A. Krosnick, and John Walker. 2008. Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership. Journal of Politics 70(1): 186–200. doi:10.1017/S0022381607080139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, K.H., and Joseph N. Cappella. 2010. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Young Mie, and John Vishak. 2008. Just Laugh! You Don’t Need to Remember: The Effects of Entertainment Media on Political Information Acquisition and Information Processing in Political Judgment. Journal of Communication 58(2): 338–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, Donald R. 2003. Communication and Politics in the Age of Information. In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis, 357–393. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirell, Andrew. 2014. MSNBC Chief Boasts of Diversity, 7 Times Larger Black Audience than Fox. Blog. Mediaite, December 29. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-chief-boasts-of-diversity-7-times-larger-black-audience-than-fox/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, Joseph T. 1960. The Effects of Mass Communication. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaCour, Michael J. 2015. A Balanced News Diet, Not Selective Exposure: Evidence from a Direct Measure of Media Exposure. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2110621. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2110621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. Scott, and Jeremy Freese. 2006. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 2nd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nyhan, Brendan, and Jason Reifler. 2010. When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior 32: 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. 2010. Americans Spending More Time Following the News. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, September 12. http://www.people-press.org/2010/09/12/americans-spending-more-time-following-the-news/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Public Broadcasting Services. 2014. Press Release: PBS Primetime Household Rating for 2013–2014 TV Season Ranks #5 Among All Broadcast and Cable Networks. Press Release, October 24. http://www.pbs.org/about/news/archive/2014/pbs-ranks-5/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redlawsk, David P., Andrew J.W. Civettini, and Karen M. Emmerson. 2010. The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever ‘Get It?’. Political Psychology 31(4): 563–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael. 2001. The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism. Journalism 2(2): 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. The News Media as Political Institutions. Annual Review of Political Science 5: 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobieraj, Sarah, and Jeffery M. Berry. 2011. From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News. Political Communication 28: 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2008. Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure. Political Behavior 30: 341–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure. Journal of Communication 60(3): 556–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, Charles S., and Milton Lodge. 2006. Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50: 755–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, J.B. (2017). A Deep Dive into Extreme Television Media Selection. In: Extreme Media and American Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41183-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics