Advertisement

‘Borders,’ ‘Leaps’ and ‘Orbs of Virtue:’ A Contextual Reconstruction of Francis Bacon’s Extension-Related Concepts

  • Dana JalobeanuEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 41)

Abstract

Francis Bacon’s natural philosophy contains a whole series of interconnected concepts related to extension, such as “borders,” “leaps” and “orbs of virtue.” These Baconian concepts are still not fully understood and are in need of a detailed analysis. They do not derive from a general conception of physical or mathematical space, and are not explainable in terms of parts of matter and aggregates. Instead, they are somewhat mysteriously defined in terms of limits and boundaries of action. This article offers a contextual investigation of Bacon’s extension relating concepts. I show that in adopting a particular strategy of deriving spatial properties and extension related concepts from a theory of action and force, Bacon follows in the footsteps of Gilbert’s magnetic philosophy. However, in contrast to the more traditional approaches of William Gilbert, Giovan Battista della Porta and Johannes Kepler, Bacon strips his extension-related concepts from most natural philosophical content and argues for a methodologically driven approach, leading to operational definitions.

Keywords

Operational Definition Simple Motion Planetary Motion Magnetic Body Magnetic Attraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research for this paper has been financed from the ERC Starting Grant Medicine of the Mind in Early Modern Europe: A New Interpretation of Francis Bacon and from the research grant PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0719, From natural history to science. I would like to thank Koen Vermeir and Jonathan Regier, as well as the anonymous referees, for their helpful and useful comments.

References

  1. Bacon, Francis. 1679. Baconiana, or certaine genuine remains of sir Francis Bacon, baron of Verulam, and viscount of St. Albans in arguments civil and moral, natural, medical, theological, and bibliographical. London: I. D. for Richard Chiswell.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, Peter, and B.R. Goldstein. 2001. Theological foundations of Kepler’s astronomy. Osiris 16: 88–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow, William. 1616. Magneticall aduertisements: or, diuers pertinent obseruations, and approued experiments, concerning the nature and properties of the load-stone. London: E. Griffin for Timothy Barlow.Google Scholar
  4. Dupré, Sven. 2012. Kepler’s optics without hypotheses. Synthese 185(3): 501–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freudenthal, Gad. 1983. Theory of matter and cosmology in William Gilbert’s De magnete. ISIS 74(1): 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Georgescu, Laura. 2014. The diagrammatic dimension of William Gilbert’s De magnete. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47: 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilbert, William. 1600. De Magnete, magneticisque corporibus, et de magno magnete tellure; Physiologia nova, plurimis & argumentis, & experimentis demonstrata. Londini: Excudebat Petrus Short.Google Scholar
  8. Gilbert, William. 1651. De Mundo nostro sublunari philosophia nova. Amstelodami: Apud Ludovicum Elzevirium.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, William. 1893. On the loadstone and magnetic bodies, and on the great magnet the earth. Trans. Paul Fleury Mottelay. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Henry, John. 2001. Animism and empiricism: copernican physics and the origins of William Gilbert’s experimental method. Journal of the History of Ideas 61(1): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hesse, Mary B. 1960a. Gilbert and the historians (I). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11(41): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hesse, Mary B. 1960b. Gilbert and the historians (II). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11(42): 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jalobeanu, Dana. 2013. Learning from experiment: classification, concept formation and modeling in Francis Bacon’s experimental philosophy. Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 57(1): 75–93.Google Scholar
  14. Jalobeanu, Dana. 2015a. The art of experimental natural history: Francis Bacon in context. Foundations of modernity. Bucharest: Zeta Books.Google Scholar
  15. Jalobeanu, Dana. 2015b. Disciplining experience: Francis Bacon’s experimental series and the art of experimentation. Perspectives on Science 23 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  16. Kelly, Suzanne. 1965. The De Mundo of William Gilbert. Menno Hertzberger & Company.Google Scholar
  17. Kepler, Johannes. 1992. New astronomy. Trans. William H Donahue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kodera, Sergius. 2014. The laboratory as stage: Giovan Battista della Porta’s experiments. Journal of Early Modern Studies 1: 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krafft, Fritz. 1991. The new celestial physics of Johannes Kepler. In Physics, cosmology and astronomy, 1300–1700: Tension and accommodation, 185–227. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Manzo, Silvia. 2006. Entre el atomismo y la alquimia. La teoria de la materia de Francis Bacon. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, David Marshall. 2014. Representing space in the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Parigi, Silvia. 2011. Gli effluvi, lo spirito del mondo e le cure magnetiche. Medicina & Storia 9(17–18): 179–199.Google Scholar
  23. Porta, Giambattista della. 1589. Magia naturalis libri vingti. Napoli: Salviani.Google Scholar
  24. Porta, Giambattista della. 1658. Natural magick in twenty books. London: Thomas Young and Samuel Speed.Google Scholar
  25. Pumfrey, Stephen. 1989. Magnetical philosophy and astronomy, 1600–1650. The General History of Astronomy 2: 45–53.Google Scholar
  26. Pumfrey, Stephen. 2002. William Gilbert. In Cambridge scientific minds, edited by Peter Harman, and Simon Mitton, 6–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pumfrey, Stephen Philip. 1987. William Gilbert’s magnetic philosophy, 1580–1684: The creation and dissolution of a discipline. University of London.Google Scholar
  28. Rabin, Sheila J. 2005. Was Kepler’s species immateriata substantial? Journal for the History of Astronomy 36: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rees, Graham. 1975a. Francis Bacon semi-paracelsian cosmology. Ambix 22: 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rees, Graham. 1975b. Francis Bacon’s semi-paracelsian cosmology and the great instauration. Ambix 22: 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rees, Graham. 1979. Francis Bacon on verticity and the bowels of the earch. Ambix 26(3): 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rees, Graham. 1980. Atomism and subtlety in Francis Bacon’s philosophy. Annals of Science 37: 549–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rees, Graham. 1996. Francis Bacon’s speculative philosophy. In Cambridge companion to Bacon, ed. Markku Peltonen, 121–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ridley, Mark. 1613. A short treatise of magneticall bodies and motions. London: Nicholas Okes.Google Scholar
  35. Ridley, Mark. 1617. Magneticall animadversions … upon certaine magneticall advertisements lately published, from Maister W. Barlow. London.Google Scholar
  36. Rusu, Doina-Cristina. 2013. From natural history to natural magic: Francis Bacon’s Sylva Sylvarum. PhD dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  37. Stephenson, Bruce. 1994. Kepler’s physical astronomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ugaglia, Monica. 2006. The science of magnetism before Gilbert Leonardo Garzoni’s Treatise on the Loadstone. Annals of Science 63(1): 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Voelkel, James R. 2001. The composition of Kepler’s Astronomia nova. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Weeks, Sophie. 2007. Francis Bacon’s science of magic. Leeds: University of Leeds.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Research in the Humanities–ICUBUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations