Advertisement

The Circulating Structure of Cosmological Space in the Seventeenth Century Chemical Tradition

  • Luc PeterschmittEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 41)

Abstract

I propose following one of the major themes in chemistry from the end of the sixteenth century to the beginning of the eighteenth: the circulation of seeds. My goal is not only to bring forward the longevity of this tradition—this is self-evident. Instead, I want to show how under diverse forms, the thesis of circulation allowed one to understand of how space was organized. In particular, I will look at the work of Joseph Duchesne (Quercetanus), Pierre-Jean Fabre and Herman Boerhaave. I will consider these three chemists as three moments in the history of chemical cosmologies that allow us to see how the spatial structure of the world has been considered.

Keywords

Primary Seed Chemical Theory Liquid Humor Formal Principle Natured Nature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper has been written with the support of the ANR (Projet PNEUMA 09 SSOC O56 1). I thank Jonathan Regier and Koen Vermeir who have commented on and corrected earlier drafts of this paper. All the defects that remain are mine.

References

  1. Boerhaave, H. 1735. Elements of chemistry, 2 vols., trans. Timothy Dallowe. London.Google Scholar
  2. Duchesne, J. 1587. Le grand miroir du monde. Lyon.Google Scholar
  3. Duchesne, J. 1605. The practice of chymicall and hermeticall physicke for the preservation of health, trans. Thomas Timme. London.Google Scholar
  4. Duchesne, J. 1676. Traité de la matière, preparation et excellente vertu de la medicine balsamique des Anciens Philosophes, auxquels sont ajoutés deux traités, l’un des Signatures externes des choses, l’autre des internes et spécifiques, conformément à la doctrine et pratique des Hermétiques. Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Emerton, N. 1984. The scientific reinterpretation of form. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fabre, P-J. 1636. Abrégé des Secrets Chymiques où l’on void la nature des animaux vegetaux & mineraux entierement découverte: avec les vertus et proprietez des principles qui composent & conservent leur estre; & un Traité de Medecine generale. Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Fabre, P-J. 1646. Panchymici, seu Anatomia totius Universi Opus, in quo de omnibus quae in coelo et sub coelo sunt spagyrice tractatur. Toulouse.Google Scholar
  8. Hirai, H. 2005. Le concept de semence dans les théories de la matière de la Renaissance de Marsile Ficin à Pierre Gassendi. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  9. Hirai, H. 2010. The world-spirit and quintessence in the chymical philosophy of Joseph Du Chesne. In Chymia: Science and nature in early modern Europe (1450–1750), ed. Miguel Lopez, et al., 247–261. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Joly, B. 1992. La rationalité de l’alchimie. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  11. Joly, B. 2012. Les alchimistes étaient-ils matérialistes? Quelques remarques sur le psychisme humain et l’esprit du monde. In Les matérialismes et la chimie, ed. F. Pépin, 39–62. Paris: Editions matériologiques.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kahn, D. 2004. L’interprétation alchimique de la Genèse chez Joseph Du Chesne dans le contexte de ses doctrines alchimiques et cosmologiques. In Scientiae et artes: Die Vermittlung alten und neuen Wissens in Literatur, Kunst und Musik, ed. Barbara Mahlmann-Bauer, 641–692. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
  13. Kahn, D. 2007. Alchimie et paracelsisme en France à la fin de la Renaissance (1567–1625). Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
  14. Knoeff, R. 2002. Herman Boerhaave (1668–1738), Calvinist chemist and physician. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Weteshappen.Google Scholar
  15. Lindeboom, G.A. 1967. Herman Boerhaave: The man and his work. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
  16. Love, R. 1972. Some sources of Herman Boerhaave’s concept of fire. Ambix 19: 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peterschmitt, L. 2005. Bacon et la chimie. A propos de la réception de la philosophie naturelle de Bacon aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles. Methodos 5. Consultable at http://methodos.Revues.org/document385.html.
  18. Powers, J.C. 2007. Scrutinizing the alchemists. Herman Boerhaave and the testing of chymistry. In Chymists and chymistry, studies in the history of alchemy and early modern chemistry, ed. L. Principe, 227–238. Sagamore Beach: Watson Publishing International and Chemical Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Powers, J.C. 2012. Herman Boerhaave and the reform of the chemical arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Principe, L., and W. Newman. 1998. Alchemy vs. chemistry: the etymological origins of a historiographic mistake. Early Science and Medicine 3: 32–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université Paris Ouest IREPHNanterre cedex, ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations