Skip to main content

Abstract

Inflammatory process of the pelvis, or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), is a frequent and serious yet treatable disease that can lead to abscess formation or pelvic fluid accumulation. When the abscess or the fluid remains into the tube, the pathology was called hydrosalpinx or pyosalpinx [1]. The condition can affect one or both fallopian tubes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Timor-Tritsch IE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A, Murphy KE, Heller DS. Transvaginal sonographic markers of tubal inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12(1):56–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gales W, Wasserheit JN. Genital chlamydial infections: epidemiology and reproductive sequelae. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1771–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Expert Committee on Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. Research directions for the 1990s. Sex Trans Dis. 1991;18:46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alcázar JL, Guerriero S, Mínguez JÁ, Ajossa S, Paoletti AM, Ruiz-Zambrana A, Jurado M. Adding cancer antigen 125 screening to gray scale sonography for predicting specific diagnosis of benign adnexal masses in premenopausal women: is it worthwhile? J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(10):1381–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sokalska A, Timmerman D, Testa AC, Van Holsbeke C, Lissoni AA, Leone FP, Jurkovic D, Valentin L. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(4):462–70. doi:10.1002/uog.6444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Strandell A, Waldenstrom U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:861–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strandell A. The influence of hydrosalpinx on IVF and embryo transfer: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6(4):387–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Strandell A, Lindhard A. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(5):1141–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eytan O, Azem F, Gull I, Wolman I, Elad D, Jaffa AJ. The mechanism of hydrosalpinx in embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(12):2662–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BW. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD002125.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sowter MC, Akande VA, Williams JA, Hull MG. Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx? Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2147–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Voorhis BJ, Sparks AE, Syrop CH, Stovall DW. Ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpinges is associated with improved pregnancy and implantation rates after in-vitro fertilization cycles. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:736–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hammadieh N, Coomarasamy A, Ola B, Papaioannou S, Afnan M, Sharif K. Ultrasound-guided hydrosalpinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(5):1113–7. doi:10.1093/humrep/den071. Epub 2008 Mar 13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guedes-Martins L, Mesquita-Guimarães J, Barreiro M. Successful pregnancies outcomes with the use of in vitro fertilization after Essure® unilateral hydrosalpinx occlusion. Acta Med Port. 2014;27(3):342–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. D'Arpe S, Franceschetti S, Caccetta J, Pietrangeli D, Muzii L, Panici PB. Management of hydrosalpinx before IVF: a literature review. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;24:1–4 [Epub ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Mais V, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography associated with colour Doppler energy in the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(7):1568–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Timor-Tritsch IE, Bar Yam Y, Elgali S, Rottem S. The technique of transvaginal sonography with the use of a 6.5 MHz probe. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:1019–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Timor-Tritsch IE. Adnexal masses. In: Goldstein SR, Timor-Tritsch E, editors. Ultrasound in gynecology. New York: Churchill-Livingstone; 1995. p. 103–14.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tessler FN, Perrella RR, Fleischer AL, Grant EG. Endovaginal sonographic diagnosis of dilated Fallopian tubes. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:523–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bulas DI, Ahlstrom PA, Sivit CJ, Blask ARN, O’Donnell RM. Pelvic inflammatory disease in the adolescent: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal sonographic evaluation. Radiology. 1992;183:435–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Patten RM, Vincent LM, Wolner-Hanssen P, Thorpe Jr E. Pelvic Inflammatory disease: endovaginal sonography with laparoscopic correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 1990;9:681–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cacciatore B, Leminen A, Ingman-Freiberg S, Ylostalo P, Paavonen J. Transvaginal sonographic findings in ambulatory patients with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80:912–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Romosan G, Bjartling C, Skoog L, Valentin L. Ultrasound for diagnosing acute salpingitis: a prospective observational diagnostic study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1569–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Atri M, Tran CN, Bret PM, Aldis AE, Kintzen GM. Accuracy of endovaginal sonography for the detection of Fallopian tubes. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:523–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taipale P, Tarjanne H, Ylostalo P. Transvaginal sonography in suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:430–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Timor-tritsch IE, Rottem S, Lewitt N. The Fallopian tube. In: Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S, editors. Transvaginal sonography. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1991. p. 131–44.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bellah RD, Rosenberg HK. Transvaginal ultrasound in a children’s hospital: is it worthwhile? Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21:570–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patel MD, Acord DL, Young SW. Likelihood ratio of sonographic findings in discriminating hydrosalpinx from other adnexal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(4):1033–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Valentin L. Imaging in gynecology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(6):881–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Wit W, Gowrising CJ, Kuik DJ, Lens JW, Schats R. Only hydrosalpinges visible on ultrasound are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(6):1696–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenström U, Thorburn J, Janson PO, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2762–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Tsymbal T. Three-dimensional ultrasound inversion rendering technique facilitates the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010;38(7):372–6. doi:10.1002/jcu.20707.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteaguado A, Tsymbal J, et al. Three-dimensional inversion rendering: a new sonographic technique and its use in gynecology. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:681.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Guerriero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Visualization of incomplete septa (AVI 8905 kb)

Another case of visualization of incomplete septa (AVI 2188 kb)

Visualization of “beads-on-a-string” sign, small hyperechoic mural nodules seen on the cross section of the fluid-filled distended structure (AVI 19140 kb)

Visualization of tubo-ovarian complex (AVI 3567 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guerriero, S., Ajossa, S., Corda, V., Perniciano, M., Piras, A., Cappai, A. (2017). Tubal Diseases. In: Guerriero, S., Martins, W., Alcazar, J. (eds) Managing Ultrasonography in Human Reproduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41037-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41037-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41035-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41037-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics