Abstract
River health is a new branch of geomorphology and hydrology. This chapter mainly deals with the definition of the term, past works as well as the problem related to the present work. River health may be defined as the condition of the anatomy and physiology of any river. Anatomy of any river mainly includes the physical condition of the river, whereas the physiology of any river includes the chemical and biological condition of the river. Physical condition of the river further includes the changing hydrological behaviour of the river, channel shifting and migration, river course change, flood and river bank erosion and related phenomena. On the other hand, physiological condition of the river includes the chemical and biological properties of the river water.
1.1 River Health
Traditionally the term ‘river health’ (Richard et al. 1999) depends solely on the measurement of physical, chemical and some biological characteristics of the river (Gore 1985; Boon et al. 1992; Brookes and Shields 1996). It is usually applied to the assessment of river condition and often found as analogous to human health.
Physical characteristics of river include the fluvial geomorphology and surface hydrology of a river basin, which control the structure and dynamics of river channel. Changes in flow and sediment regimes following catchment modification can markedly alter the physical nature of the channel. River channel can function in unnatural ways (Schumm 1988; Gurnell and Petts 1995). Moreover the chemical indicators (mostly of water quality) are the most commonly used for detecting the ‘river health’ (Hart et al. 1999; Maher et al. 1999).
Hynes (1975) argued that ‘in every respect the valley rules the stream’, where catchment character influences a river by large-scale controls on hydrology, sediment delivery and chemistry (Allan and Johnson 1997). Rivers are among the most intensively human-influenced ecosystems on the earth. They serve for transportation, water supply, power generation and also as a source of food as well as sinks for waste products. As a result, in highly industrialised countries and in some developing countries, many rivers are now severely unhealthy. Most common impacts are channel and bank modifications (i.e. canalisation for agricultural purposes, bank protection, development of slums), flow regulation and fragmentation (i.e. reservoirs for water supply, diversion for irrigation and industrial purposes), unscientific collection of soil and sediments (e.g. sand quarrying from the riverbed and bank for industrial as well as domestic purpose) and chemical pollution (e.g. heavy metals, pesticides, fertilisers) and organic pollution (e.g. domestic and cattle-raising waste water). All these alterations have led to an extensive ecological degradation of these rivers, making them no longer sustainable in providing goods and services (e.g. decline in water quality and availability, intense flooding) (Poff et al. 1997). Norris and Thoms (1999) defined the term river from biological point of view. According to them the term ‘river health’, applied to the assessment of river condition, is often seen as being analogous with human health, giving many a sense of understanding. Unfortunately, the meaning of ‘river health’ remains obscure. It is not clear what aspects of river health sets of ecosystem-level indicators actually identify, nor how physical, chemical and biological characteristics may be integrated into measures rather than just observations of cause and effect.
Certainly it is argued that if the river side habitat was in poor condition, the health of the stream would be affected adversely (Plafkin et al. 1989; Brookes and Shields 1996). It shows that if we have an unhealthy catchment or valley, we would have an unhealthy stream. Similarly, this assessment can also do in reverse: a stream may be assessed as being unhealthy and then it is concluded that the catchment is unhealthy (Sweeney 1992; Osborne and Kovacic 1993).
In a nutshell, river health may be defined as the condition of the anatomy and physiology of any river. Anatomy of any river mainly includes the physical condition of the river, whereas the physiology of any river includes the chemical and biological condition of the river. Physical condition of the river further includes the changing hydrological behaviour of the river, channel shifting and migration, river course change, flood and river bank erosion and related phenomena. On the other hand, physiological condition of the river includes the chemical and biological properties of the river water. Thus, river health is a subject, which combines fluvial geomorphology, river hydrology and environmental pollution. It is worth mentioning that all of the aforesaid conditions of the river health may be changed due to human intervention.
1.2 The Problem
The river is treated as the lifeline of Agartala, the Capital City of Tripura. Originating from the Baramura Hill, the river debouches onto the rolling plain at Chandrasadhubari near the NH 44. Thousands of people between Chandrasadhubari and the boundary of Bangladesh have been settled along the river bank and directly dependent on the river. Moreover, about 60 % of population of Agartala City is directly or indirectly dependent on the river for drinking water and other domestic purposes.
Previous records show that the river bank was almost uninhabited and the population of the whole basin was also less. During that period, most part of the upper catchment of the river was densely covered with vegetation without any human intervention. Since the partition of India and East Pakistan (presently Bangladesh), and particularly from 1950, huge number of people immigrated to the state from East Pakistan (Bangladesh) as refugee. Most of those immigrants were spread over the whole basin, and the weaker section (below poverty line) of such population settled along the river and thereby increased the pressure on the river enormously. Moreover, with the increasing population, medium- and small-scale industries have also emerged within the Haora River basin. The workers of such industries started to commit nuisances and throw all types of solid wastes along the river bank. All of these activities affected the quality of river water and the pollution level of water also started to increase.
Vulnerable geological structure, unconsolidated soil layers and heavy and concentrated rainfall along with deforestation, cutting of uplands (locally called tilla) and unscientific and unplanned usage of land have led to the establishment of a vicious cycle of denudation. All these eroded materials are carried down the lower reach of the Haora River during monsoon period and created a fluctuating nature of river physiology through the enhancement of scouring and filling. In addition to that, artificial deposit of solid waste along the river bank supplies some extra amount of sediment load to the river. The river sometimes fails to carry these excess sediment loads and deposits them in different sections of its lower reach. As a result, the depth as well as the cross-sectional area of the river valley decreases that fails to carry excess amount of unusual monsoonal discharge and allows water to spill causing floods ruining the lives and properties of the local inhabitants.
Moreover, in some places, people hinder the natural flow of the river by constructing causeways, putting cement bags across the river for water storage and also cultivating the dry riverbed during lean season, through which the natural dynamics of the river is being changed. If immediate necessary measures are not taken, the whole area will suffer from the scarcity of drinking water and flood hazard during monsoon period. Therefore, the present study has been undertaken to find out the problems related to the overall health of the Haora River and to bring out some possible suggestions for restoring ecological balance and geopolitical stability of this strategically important part of the country.
For an in-depth study of the river health, the Haora River from the state of Tripura (NE India) has been taken into consideration under the following points:
-
To identify the nature and extent of population change within the basin along the river up to the floodplain boundaries
-
To detect the nature of changing course of the Haora River and probable causes behind it
-
To assess anthropogenic impact on the river in terms of agricultural growth, industrialisation and expansion of slums
-
To analyse the pollution status of river water
-
To estimate the amount of soil loss contributing to augmented sediment load within the channel with the help of RUSLE method
-
To analyse the nature and extent of bank erosion along the Haora River
1.3 Past Works
1.3.1 Earlier Published Works on Different Issues Related to the Haora River
Many research works have been carried out on several topics like population and urban growth, sedimentation and pollution on the Haora River both nationally and internationally.
Different government and non-government agencies have prepared reports on the inventory about the present status of the water quality of Haora River near Agartala town by analysing the impact of slum dwellers and urban growth on the river near Agartala; urban infrastructure and service improvement including the rehabilitation, improvement and expansion of (i) water supplies, (ii) sewerage and sanitation and (iii) solid waste management for the Agartala city. Most of the reports are kept for departmental use only and not available for public use. Tripura State Pollution Control Board (2004) prepared a detailed study on pollution status of the Haora River.
Datta et al. (2008) used distributed hydrological modelling to quantify the future water availability as well as the importance of Haora River basin and to formulate the water quality management. The Tripura State Pollution Control Board has published the detailed monograph of De (2012) on the ‘Geoenvironmental status of Haora River’. The monograph was prepared on the basis of an intensive study on the Haora River in order to save the river from its deterioration and was the premier report of its kind on the river. Bhattacharyya et al. (2007) prepared a model for estimating the soil loss and its impact on crop productivity for the entire Tripura.
1.3.2 Human Population Growth and Its Impact on the River Basin
Anthropogenic activity plays an important role in the modification of environment. With the rapid development of technology, man is reforming landforms for fulfilling their need and greed. This reformation of topography has both positive and negative impacts on the environment. Several anthropogenic activities are responsible for changing the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of any river, but most of the earlier works are mainly concentrated on the human impacts on the chemical and biological properties of the river. Very few works have been done on the physical health of the river.
Keith et al. (2013) prepared a survey on the demand of water resource of the growing population within the Nile Valley. Some other works of Swain (1997, 2002) and Tadesse (2004) have also emphasised on the demand of population on the same area. On the same issue, but on other rivers have been conducted by Pitchammal et al. (2009). Yeasmin and Khan (2012) published a detailed report on the impact brick industries within a river basin.
Impact of anthropogenic activity on river is an important issue, but there is hardly any generalised work on it. Most of the works have been carried out on the basis of one or two individual parameters, e.g. Nawa and Frissell (1993), Langer (2003) and Salahuddin (2009) have published papers on the impact of sand mining in the river and also recommend best possible alternative ways for scientific sand quarrying. Michael and Layher (1998) and Kori and Mathada (2012) have worked on the impact of sand mining in altering land use and habitat degradation of the riparian environment.
Similarly very few works have been published internationally on the impact of causeways on river (e.g. Percy 2008). The effect on bridges on the river system is an important issue worldwide (Hencock 2002). Heidarnejad et al. (2010) accounted for a detailed engineering report on the flow pattern and mechanisms of unnatural riverbed scouring around the bridge piers. Coleman and Melville (2001) also provide a detailed work on the mechanism of scouring and bridge failure. The works on related field, such as the nature of gravel scouring around the bridge on different rivers, and the works of Laursen (1960), Ettema (1980), Klaassen and Vermeer (1988a) and Watson (1990) are notable.
Impact of bridge piers in the river system is an emerging issue in the current research. The works of Breusers et al. (1977), Heidarnejad et al. (2010) and Shen and Schneider (1969) are mainly based on the mechanism of scouring of river around the bridge piers and the impact of this on the river. Biswas (2010) and Seiyaboh et al. (2013) have given more emphasis on the environmental impact of bridge piers on the river.
Saviour (2012) has prepared a detailed report on the impact of sand mining on the environment. A field analysis on the impact of sand mining on the natural dynamics of the Padma River has been done by Singh et al. (2007). Suvendu (2013) has prepared a report on the impact of four causeways on the temporal change in the cross section, course and depositional pattern of the Kunur River, West Bengal. Impact of bridge piers has also been an important issue in India (Dey 1999; Kumar et al. 1999).
Large river systems throughout the planet have been dramatically transformed due to river control projects such as large dams and embankments. Unlike other major human impacts like anthropogenic climate change, the alteration of river systems has been deliberate and planned by a small, powerful set of experts (Baghel 2014). The concept of large-scale transformation of fluvial environments into technological hydroscapes originated in the West, widespread construction of large dams started in the countries of the Global South in the period after decolonisation. Construction and operation of large dams are amongst the most prestigious but also most sensitive development issues, often accompanied by massive resistance of adversely affected people and civil society organisations that affect the river health to a greater extent (Nüsser 1995).
1.3.3 Course Change of the River
The course of any river is very dynamic in nature. Since its origin, a river changes its course in response to topography, tectonic settings, sediment flow and human activity. Ebro River, Spain (Ollero 2010); Beatton River, Canada (Nanson 1981); and Po River, Italy (Braga and Gervasoni 1989) changed their course for several times due to any of the aforesaid reasons.
Several papers on channel shifting or course change on numbers of rivers like the Ganga River (Harijan et al. 2003; Pati et al. 2008; Swamee et al. 2003), the Kosi River, (Gole and Chitale 1966; Wells and Dorr 1987), the Gandaki River (Mohindra et al. 1992), the Brahmaputra River (Kotoky et al. 2005), the Meghna River (Rahman and Khan 2001; Rahman et al. 2004) and the Indus River (Harbor et al. 1994) have been published in which the trend and causes of such changes have been discussed.
1.3.4 Bank Erosion of the River
Bank erosion is a severe problem to any fluvial system, and several attempts have been made to demarcate, quantify and control bank erosion. The following are different methods of estimating bank erosion:
-
(a)
Graft method (Graft 1984) proposed that bank erosion probability for any given cell could be determined by taking its lateral distance towards the upstream side of the active river channel and a value representing flood magnitudes for the given period.
-
(b)
Bank shifting method (Sandra and David 2000) estimates bank erosion by superimposing temporal river banks and measuring the gap between them.
-
(c)
Photoelectronic erosion pin (PEEP) method (Lawler 1991) provides quasi-continuous data of the frequency, magnitude and timing of the individual erosion and deposition on the river banks.
-
(d)
Experiment method (Imanshoar et al. 2012) estimated subsurface bank erosion of vertical river banks, composed of alternate layers of sand and clay under uniformly distributed constant overhead pressure
-
(e)
Method of measuring bank material strength (Thorne 1981) by using erosion pins to large-scale studies using aerial photos and maps.
-
(f)
Numerical analysis of river channel processes with bank erosion (Nagata et al. 2000) used for investigating both bed deformation and bank line shifting in 2D platform in a moving boundary-fitted coordinate system.
-
(g)
Bank Erosion Hazard Index (BEHI) and near-bank stress (NBS) method (Rosgen 1996). BEHI and NBS are used together as independent variables in a series of regression equations that predict annual lateral bank retreat. Some other GIS-based methods have also been introduced to estimate bank erosion (Bhakal et al. 2005; Kummu et al. 2008; Thakur et al. 2012).
Several attempts have also been made for demarcation and mitigation of bank erosion in different rivers in India. Das and Saraf (2007), Goswami (2001) and Singh et al. (2004) tried to estimate the bank erosion of the Brahmaputra River, one of the major bank erosion-prone rivers of India. Some other individuals worked on the demarcation and mitigation processes of Ganga River bank erosion, like Banerjee (1999), Mukhopadhyay (2003), Pati et al. (2008) and Roy (2004). The nature and extent of bank erosion have been studied for a part of Majuli Island using remote sensing data (Mani et al. 2000, 2003) and the Brahmaputra River channel, Assam, India (Kotoky et al. 2005).
1.3.5 Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Problem of the River Basin
The Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and the Modified Universal Soil Loss Equation (MUSLE) methods of FAO/UNEP are widely used methods of estimating soil erosion. Using USLE with the help of GIS technology, Gupta et al. (2005) estimated soil loss for the Luni River basin, Allahabad, and found that this method is useful for better soil conservation practice in the basin. Similar method has been used for estimating soil loss for different areas of the world by Beach (1992), Sadeghi (2004), Nontananandh and Changnoi (2012), etc., and got positive results. Shrestha (1997) and Ande et al. (2009) have used Morgan and Morgan Finney (MMF) model on highly dissected terrain land in their respective areas of study. Ferro and Minacapilli (1995) argued that a particular model revealed more accurate result than other versions of RUSLE, because of the predominance of higher relative relief in their study areas.
Changes in agricultural techniques reduce the amount of erosion and subsequent sediment transport throughout a basin (Julien and Vensel 2005). Adams and Roberts (1993) proposed an inventory on erosion and sedimentation (both natural and artificial) of Mississippi Delta through the analysis of hydrological parameters and the factors that lead to soil erosion in the upper catchment of the river. Sedimentation problem in some of the large rivers of Asia have been studied by Bali and Karale (1977), Sadeghi (2011), Walling (2011) and Khan et al. (2007), and some case studies have been done to investigate their nature and extent of sedimentation by Chappell et al. (2011), Furuichi and Wasson (2011), Sarker et al. (2011) and Ziegler et al. (2011).
Chandramohon and Durbude (2001) used ILWIS software for estimating soil loss of the Hire Nadi Catchment, Karnataka, and analysed the terrain condition through the RUSLE method. Some other works on estimating soil erosion applying RUSLE have got real result with the field (Singh et al. 1985; Gupta et al. 2005; Javed et al. 2009; Ahmad and Verma 2013). MMF model of soil erosion has also been successfully used by Behera et al. (2005), Kumar and Sharma (2005), Ghosh and Guchhait (2012) and Kale and Vadsola (2012).
Kothyari (1997, 2011) and Kothyari and Jain (1997) have prepared an inventory on the sedimentation problem and its management for the sub-Himalayan regions (Jain and Jain 2011; Mishra and Sen 2011).
1.3.6 Water Pollution
Increasing growth of population along with the development in the agricultural and industrial sectors is considered as a major threat to river health. Unscientific releases of toxic chemicals from the industries into the river make the water polluted and become the source of several waterborne diseases. Environmentalists have enacted several laws for regulating the pollution level, but still it is a great threat to the society as well as environment.
Most of the papers related to pollution are focused on the concentration of several metallic, nonmetallic and biological pollutants on the river water that are coming from the industrial and agricultural sectors (Bolawa and Gbenle 2012; Graft et al. 1991; Ladd et al. 1998). The Surface Water Quality Bureau (1999) conducted a series of multiple-day intensive water quality surveys of the Red River watershed and selected tributary streams. Solid waste disposal from the city or other overpopulated areas along the river bank or inside the river is another source of water pollution (APHA 1996; Aramini et al. 2009; Coleman 1976; Radha Krishnan et al. 2007 and Sallae 1974). BIS (1992) analysed the impact of solid waste disposal in the Yamuna River.
Effluents from tannery industries along the Ganga River at Kanpur City pollute the river water as well as the sediment (Beg and Ali 2008). Changes in water quality of the Jhelum River and other springs due to urban waste disposal have brought great threat to the health of the people living downstream to Srinagar and Jammu valley (Rather et al. 2010, 2014). Heavy metal concentration and sediment quality in the Indian rivers have been studied by Reddy and Baghel (2010) and Rengalakshmi et al. (2007).
Spatiotemporal analysis of pollution and sedimentation of any river system is very difficult because of the shortage of available data. Selection of proper technique is also a difficult task. The magnitude of anthropogenic impact also varies from one river to another. Thus, we need to select proper technique of analysing such problems considering all such facets. The statistical methods or approaches based on GIS seem to be more reasonable as it provides high accuracy.
References
Adams CE, Roberts HH (1993) A model of the effects of sedimentation-rate on the stability of Mississippi Delta sediments. Geo-Mar Lett Spinger 13(1):17–23
Ahmad I, Verma MK (2013) Application of USLE model & GIS in estimation of soil erosion for Tandula reservoir. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 3(4):570–576
Allan JD, Johnson LB (1997) Catchment-scale analysis of aquatic ecosystems. Freshw Biol 37:107–111
Ande OT, Alaga Y, Oluwatosin GA (2009) Soil erosion prediction using MMF model on highly dissected hilly terrain of Ekiti environs in southwestern Nigeria. Int J Phys Sci 4(2):053-057. http://www.academicjournals.org/IJPS
APHA (1996) Standard methods of examination of water and wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Aramini JM, McLean M, Wilson J, Holt J, Copes R, Allen B, Sears W (2009) Drinking water quality and health care utilization for gastrointestinal illness in greater Vancouver, environmental and workplace health reports and publications, pp 178–191
Baghel R (2014) River control in India: Spatial, Governmental and Subjective Dimensions Springer, pp 1–165
Bali YP, Karale RL (1977) Sediment Yield Index as a criterion for choosing priority basins. IAHS-AISH Publ 122:180–188
Banerjee M (1999) A report on the impact of Farakka Barrage on the human fabric, On behalf of South Asian network on dams, rivers and people (SANDRP). http://www.sandrp.in/dams/impact_frka_ wcd.pdf
Beach T (1992) Estimating soil loss from medium-size drainage basins. Phys Geogr 13(3):206–224. doi: 10.1080/02723646.1992.10642454
Beg KR, Ali S (2008) Chemical contaminants and toxicity of Ganga River sediment from up and down stream area at Kanpur. Am J Environ Sci 4(4):362–366
Behera P, Rao KHVD, Das KK (2005) Soil erosion modeling using MMF model -a remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(1):165–176
Bhakal L, Dubey B, Sarma AK (2005) Estimation of bank erosion in the River Brahmaputra near Agyathuri by using geographic information system. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(1):81–84. doi:10.1007/BF02989994
Bhattacharyya T, Babu R, Sarkar D, Mandal C, Dhyani BL (2007) Soil loss and crop productivity model in humid sub-tropical India. Curr Sci 93(10):1397–1403
BIS (1992) Indian Standard Specification for drinking water, IS 10500. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
Biswas SK (2010) Effect of bridge pier on waterways constriction: a case study using 2-D mathematical modelling. Amin, Okui, Bhuiyan (eds). IABSE-JSCE Joint conference on advances in bridge engineering-II, 8–10 August 2010, Dhaka, pp 369–376
Bolawa OE, Gbenle GO (2012) Analysis of industrial impact on physiochemical parameters and heavy metal concentrations in waters of river Majidun, Molatori and Ibeshe around Ikorodu in Lagos, Nigeria. J Environ Sci Water Resour 1(2):34–38
Boon PJ, Calow P, Petts GE (1992) River conservation and management. Wiley, Chichester, 470
Braga G, Gervasoni S (1989) Evolution of the Po River: an example of the application of historic maps. In: Petts GE, Moller H, Roux AL (eds) Historical change of large alluvial rivers: western Europe. Wiley, Chichester, pp 113–126
Breusers HNC, Nicollet G, Shen HW (1977) Local scour around cylindrical piers. J Hydraul Res 15(3):211–252
Brookes A, Shields FD (1996) River channel restoration: guiding principles for sustainable projects. Wiley, Chichester, 433
Chandramohon T, Durbude DG (2001) Application of GIS for the assessment of soil erosion using universal soil loss equation- National Institute of Hydrology (NIH), Jalvigyan Bhawan, Roorkee, Uttarnchal
Chappell NA, Tych W, Shearman P, Lokes B, Chitoa J (2011) River sediment monitoring for baseline and change characterisation: a new management tool for the Ramu River communities in Papua New Guinea. Sediment problems and sediment management in Asian River Basins IAHS publication 236, pp 92–102
Coleman RL (1976) Potential public health aspects of trace elements and drinking water quality. Annu Okla Acad Sci 5:57–63
Coleman SE, Melville BW (2001) Case study: New Zealand Bridge scour experiences. J Hydraul Eng 27(7):535–546
Das JD, Saraf AK (2007) Remote sensing in the mapping of the rahmaputra/Jamuna River channel patterns and its relation to various landforms and tectonic environment. Int J Remote Sens 28(16):3619–3631
Datta S, Roy PK, Mazumdar A (2008) Water system analysis of Haora river basin at Tripura. J Inst Eng 88:3–6
De S (2012) Geo-environmental status of Haora River. Tripura State Pollution Control Board. Tripura Government Press, pp 1–114
Dey S (1999) Time-variation of scour in the vicinity of circular piers. Water Maritime Eng J, Proc Inst Civil Eng, Thomas Telford J, London 136(2):67–75, Paper 11426, June
Ettema R (1980) Scour at bridge piers. School of Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 216, pp 26–40
Ferro V, Minacapilli M (1995) Sediment delivery processes at basin scale. Hydrol Sci J 40(6):703–717
Furuichi T, Wasson RJ (2011) Placing sediment budgets in the socio‐economic context for management of sedimentation in Lake Inle, Myanmar. Sediment problems and sediment management in Asian River Basins IAHS publication 236, pp 103–113
Ghosh S, Guchhait SK (2012) Soil loss estimation through USLE and MMF methods in the lateritic tracts of eastern plateau fringe of Rajmahal traps, India. Ethiop J Environ Stud Manage EJESM. 5(4):529–541. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v5i4.S13
Gole CV, Chitale SV (1966) Inland delta building activity of Kosi river. J Hydraul Div Am Soc Civil Eng 92:111–126
Gore JA (ed) (1985) The restoration of rivers and streams. Butterworth, Stoneham, 280
Goswami DC (2001) Brahmaputra river, Assam, India: physiography, basin denudation and channel aggradation. WRR 21, pp 959–978
Graft WL (1984) A probabilistic approach to the spatial assessment of river channel instability. Water Resour Res 20(7):953–962
Graft WL, Clark SL, Kammerer MT, Lehman T, Randall K, Schroeder R (1991) Geomorphology of heavy metals in the sediments of Queen Creek, Arizona, USA. Catena 18, pp 567–579
Gupta RD, Agarwal VC, Hari Kishan GS (2005) Implementation of USLE model under GIS environment for soil erosion assessment: a case study of Loni river watershed. Map India, pp 110–126
Gurnell AM, Petts GE (eds) (1995) Changing river channels. Wiley, Chichester, 442
Harbor DJ, Schumm SA, Harvey MD (1994) Tectonic control of the Indus River in Sindh, Pakistan. In: Schumm SA, Winkley BR (eds) The variability of large alluvial rivers. American Society of Civil Engineers Press, New York, pp 161–175
Harijan N, Kumar A, Bhoi S, Tare V (2003) Course of river Ganga over a century near Kanpur city based on remote sensing data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 31:1–2
Hart BT, Maher W, Lawrence I (1999) New generation water quality guidelines for ecosystem protection. Freshw Biol 41:347–359
Heidarnejad M, Bajestan MS, Masjedi A (2010) The effect of slots on scouring around piers in different positions of 180-degrees bends. World Appl Sci J 8(7):892–899
Hencock PJ (2002) Human impacts on the stream–ground water exchange zone. Environ Manag 29(6):763–781
Hynes HBN (1975) Edgardo Baldi memorial lecture. The stream and its valley. Verhandlungen der Inte-nationalen Vereinigung fuÈ r Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, vol 19, pp 1–15
Imanshoar F, Tabatabai MRM, Hassanzadeh Y, Rostamipoor M (2012) Experimental study of subsurface erosion in river banks. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 61:791–795
Jain SK, Jain SK (2011) Assessment of reservoir sedimentation using remote sensing. Sediment problems and sediment management in Asian River Basins IAHS publication 236, pp 163–170
Javed M, Khanday Y, Ahmed R (2009) Prioritization of Sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 37:261–274
Julien PY, Vensel CW (2005) Review of sedimentation issues on the Mississippi river. Draft report presented to the UNESCO, pp 1–48
Kale GD, Vadsola SN (2012) Modelling of soil erosion by non conventional methods. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 63:693–699
Keith B, Enos MJ, Garlick CB, Simmons G, Copeland D, Cortizo M (2013) Limits to population growth and water resource adequacy in the Nile River Basin, 1994–2100. A report prepared by environmental laboratory, Eng Res Dev Center 2013(4):1–42
Khan HR, Rahman K, Abdur Rouf AJM, Sattar GS, Oki Y, Adachi T (2007) Assessment of degradation of agricultural soils arising from brick burning in selected soil profiles. Int J Environ Sci Tech 4(4):471–480
Klaassen GJ, Vermeer K (1988a) Confluence scour in large braided rivers with fine bed material. In: Proceedings of the international conference on Fluvial Hydraulics. Budapest, Hungary, pp 395–408
Kori E, Mathada H (2012) An assessment of environmental impacts of sand and gravel mining in Nzhelele Valley, Limpopo Province, South Africa. In: 3rd international conference on biology, environment and chemistry. IACSIT Press, Singapore 46(29), 137–141
Kothyari UC (1997) Erosion and sedimentation problems in India. Erosion and sediment yield: global and regional perspectives. In: Proceedings of the exeter symposium, July 1996. IAHS publication no. 236
Kothyari UC (2011) Sediment problems and sediment management in the Indian Sub‐Himalayan region. Sediment problems and sediment management in Asian River Basins IAHS publication 236, pp 3–13
Kothyari UC, Jain SK (1997) Sediment yield estimation using GIS. Hydrol Sci J 42(6):833–843
Kotoky P, Bezbaruah D, Baruah J, Sarma JN (2005) Nature of bank erosion along the Brahmaputra river channel, Assam, India. Curr Sci 88(4):634–640
Kumar S, Sharma S (2005) Soil erosion risk assessment based on MMF model using remote sensing and GIS. Hydrol J 28(1-2):47–58
Kumar V, Raju KGR, Vittal N (1999) Reduction of local scour around Bridge Piers using slots and collars. J Hydraul Eng 125:1302–1305
Kummu M, Lub XX, Rasphonec A, Sarkkulad J, Koponen J (2008) Riverbank changes along the Mekong River: remote sensing detection in the Vientiane-Nong Khai Area. Quat Int 186(1):100–112. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2007.10.015
Ladd SC, Marcus WA, Cherry S (1998) Differences in trace metal concentrations among fluvial morphologic units and implications for sampling. Environ Geol 36(3-4):259–268
Langer WH (2003) A general overview of the technology of in-stream mining of sand and gravel resources, associated potential environmental impacts, and methods to control potential impacts: U.S. geological survey open-file report 02-0153, pp 44–46
Laursen EM (1960) Scour at bridge crossings. J Hydr Div ASCE 86(2):39–54
Lawler DM (1991) A new technique for the automatic monitoring of erosion and deposition rates. Water Resour Res 27:2125–2128
Maher W, Batley GE, Lawrence I (1999) Assessing the health of sediment ecosystems: use of chemical measurements. Freshw Biol 41:361–372
Mani P, Kumar R, Chatterjee C (2003) Erosion study of a part of Majuli River-Island using remote sensing data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 31(1):12–18
Michael R, Layher M (1998) Instream sand and gravel mining: environmental issues and regulatory process in the United States. Fisheries 23(11):115–123
Mishra K, Sen D (2011) Sedimentation behind barrages and oblique river flow. Sediment problems and sediment management in Asian River Basins. IAHS publication 236, pp 193–202
Mohindra R, Parkash B, Prasad J (1992) Historical geomorphology and pedology of the Gandak megafan, Middle Gangetic Plains, India. Earth Surf Process Landf 17:643–662
Mukhopadhyay S (2003) River bank erosion and land degradation, a study of river Ganga, land degradation and desertification. Rawat Publication, New Delhi, pp 366–373
Nagata N, Hosoda T, Muramoto Y (2000) Numerical analysis of river channel processes with bank erosion. J Hydraul Eng 126(4):243–252
Nanson GC (1981) New evidence of scroll-bar formation on the Beatton River. Sedimentology 28:889–891. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.1981.tb01950.x
Nawa RK, Frissell CA (1993) Measuring scour and fill of gravel streambeds with scour chains and sliding-bead monitors. N Am J Fish Manag 13:634–639
Nontananandh S, Changnoi B (2012) Internet GIS, based on USLE modeling, for assessment of soil erosion in Songkhram Watershed, Northeastern of Thailand. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 46:272–282
Norris RH, Thoms MC (1999) What is river health? Freshw Biol 41:197–209
Nüsser M (1995). Large dams in Asia: contested environments between technological hydroscapes and social resistance. Springer, pp 1–168
Ollero A (2010) Channel changes and floodplain management in the meandering middle Ebro River, Spain. Geomorphology 117:247–260
Osborne LL, Kovacic DA (1993) Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshw Biol 29:243–258
Pati JK, Lal J, Prakash K, Bhusan R (2008) Spatio-temporal Shift of Western Bank of the Ganga River, Allahabad City and its implications. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 36:289–297
Percy JA (2008) The “cause” in causeway: crossing the Avon River at windsor. Fundy issues. Sustainable communities and ecosystem division environment Canada 28, pp 1–12
Pitchammal V, Subramanian G, Ramadevi P, Ramanathan R (2009) The study of water quality at Madurai, Tamilnadu, India. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 8(2):355–358
Plafkin JL, Barbour MT, Porter KD, Gross SK, Hughes RM (1989) Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, vol 440. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC, pp 4–89
Poff NL, Allan D, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime. A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784
Radha Krishnan R, Dharmaraj K, Ranjitha Kumari BD (2007) A comparative study on the physicochemical and bacterial analysis of drinking, borewell and sewage water in the three different places of Sivakasi. J Environ Biol 28(1):105–108
Rahman MK, Khan HR (2001) Impacts of brick kiln on topsoil degradation and environmental pollution. Project report submitted to the Ministry of Science and Information and Communication Technology, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka, pp 210–220
Rahman MM, Hussain MA, Islam GMT, Haque MA, Hoque MM (2004) Hydro-morphological characteristics around the Meghna bridge site in the Meghna river, Japan Bangladesh Joint Study Project on Floods: phase II: final report
Rather GM, Bhat MS, Kanth TA (2010) Impact of urban waste of Srinagar City on quality of water of River Jhelum. Int J Lakes Rivers 3(1):17–24
Rather GM, Hajam RA, Bhat MS, Kanth TA (2014) Spring water quality and human health in foothill settlements of Pir Panjal range in Anantnag and Kulgam Districts of Jammu and Kashmir State, India. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, Akhtar R (eds) Environmental deterioration and human health. Natural and Anthropogenic Determinants, Spinger, pp 349–371
Reddy PB, Baghel BS (2010) Impact of industrial wastewaters on the physicochemical characteristics of Chembal River at Nagda, M.P., India. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 9(3):519–526
Rengalakshmi R, Senthilkumar R, Selvarasu T, Thamizoli P (2007) A holistic study on mercury pollution in the Ganga River system at Varanasi, India. Curr Sci 92(9):1223–1228
Richard H, Norris M, Martin CT (1999) What is river health?. Freshwater Biol 41. Blackwell Science Ltd, pp 197–209
Rosgen DL (1996) Applied river morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs, pp 6–42
Roy SC (2004) A study report on control of left Bank Erosion of River Ganga between Rajmahal and Farakka by Irrigation and water ways. Department Government of West Bengal
Sadeghi SH (2004) Application ff MUSLE in prediction of sediment yield in Iranian conditions. In: 13th international soil conservation organization conference-Brisbane, July 2004, Conserving soil and water for society 998, pp 1–6
Sadeghi SH (2011) An overview of sediment problems and management in Iran. Sediment problems and sediment management in Asian River Basins. IAHS publication 236, pp 14–20
Salahuddin JS (2009) River sand mining management guideline. Ministry of natural resources and environment. Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia. Department of Irrigation and Drainage (DID), pp 1–47
Sallae AJ (1974) Water-borne diseases. In: Fundamental principles of bacteriology, 7th edn. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Ltd, New Delhi
Sandra JW, David JG (2000) A GIS-based approach to mapping probabilities of River Bank erosion: regulated river tummel, Scotland. Regul Rivers: Res Manage 16:127–140
Sarker MH, Akter J, Ferdous MR, Noor F (2011) Sediment dispersal processes and management in coping with climate change in the Meghna Estuary, Bangladesh. Sediment problems and sediment management in Asian River Basins. IAHS publication 236, pp 203–218
Saviour MN (2012) Environmental impact of soil and sand mining: a review. Int J Sci Environ Technol 1(3):125–134
Schumm SA (1988) Variability of the fluvial system in space and time. Scales and global change: spatial and temporal variability in biospheric and geospheric processes (eds. volume). International Council of Scientific Unions. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 35, pp 225–250
Seiyaboh EI, Inyang IR, Gijo AH (2013) Environmental impact of Tombia Bridge construction across Nun River in Central Niger Delta, Nigeria. Int J Eng Sci (IJES) 2(11):32–41
Shen HW, Schneider VR (1969) Local scour around bridge piers. J Hydraul Div Proc Am Soc Civil Eng 95(6):1919–1941
Shrestha DP (1997) Assessment of soil erosion in the Nepalese Himalaya, a case study in Likhu Khola Valley, Middle Mountain Region. Land Husbandry, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd 2(1):59–80
Singh G, Rambabu VV, Chandra S (1985) Research on the universal soil loss equation in India. J Soil Erosion Conserv, Soil Conserv Soc Am, pp 496–508
Singh VP, Sharma N, Ojha CSP (2004) The Brahmaputra basin water resources
Singh G, Mehta KK, Sharma RC, Chawla KL, Joshi PK, Yaduvanchi NP (2007) Technical bulletin on sand mining or no mining in Agricultural fields in Haryana, pp 35–42
Surface Water Quality Bureau (1999) Water quality survey summary for the Red River and Tributaries. New Mexico Environment Department (NMED), pp 4–16
Suvendu R (2013) The effect of toad crossing on river morphology and Riverine aquatic life: a case study in Kunur River Basin, West Bengal. Ethiopian J Environ Stud Manage 6:835–845. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ejesm.v6i6.14S
Swain A (1997) Ethiopia, the Sudan, and Egypt: The Nile River Dispute. J Mod Afr Stud 35(4):675–694
Swain A (2002) The Nile Basin initiative: too many cooks, too little broth. SAIS Rev 22(2):293–308
Swamee PK, Parkash B, Thomas JV, Singh S (2003) Changes in channel pattern of River Ganga between Mustafabad and Rajmahal, Gangetic plains since 18th century. Int J Sed Res 18:219–231
Sweeney BW (1992) Streamside forest and the physical, chemical, and trophic characteristics of Piedmont streams in eastern North America. Water Sci Technol 26:2653–2673
Tadesse K (2004) Strategic planning for groundwater assessment in Ethiopia. A paper presented to international conference and exhibition on groundwater in Ethiopia: from 25–27 May 2004. Addis Ababa: Ethiopia
Thakur PK, Laha C, Aggarwal SP (2012) River bank erosion hazard study of river Ganga, upstream of Farakka barrage using remote sensing and GIS. Nat Hazards, Spingers 61:967–987
Thorne CR (1981) Field measurements of rates of bank erosion and bank material strength. Erosion and sediment transport measurement. In: Proceedings of the florence symposium, June 1981. IAHS Publication 133, pp 503–512
Tripura Pollution Control board (TSPCB) (2004) Report on pollution status assessment of Haora River, pp 1–19
Walling DE (2011) Human impact on the sediment loads of Asian rivers. Sediment problems and sediment management in Asian River Basins. IAHS publication 349, pp 37–51
Watson AW (1990) A case study of scour assessment at a proposed bridge crossing. RRU Bulletin 84, 5:147–152
Wells NA, Dorr JA (1987) Shifting of Koshi river, Northern India. Geology 15:204–207
Yeasmin F, Khan A (2012) Livelihood pattern of brickfield workers in Bangladesh. Asian J Res Bus Econ Manage 2(3):36–58
Ziegler AD, Xi Xi L, Tantasarin C (2011) Sediment load monitoring in the Mae Sa catchment in northern Thailand. Sediment problems and sediment management in Asian River Basins IAHS publication 236, pp 86–91
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bandyopadhyay, S., De, S.K. (2017). Introduction. In: Human Interference on River Health. Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41018-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41018-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41017-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41018-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)