Skip to main content

Reevaluating the Roles of the Stakeholders in Language Education: How Student Autonomy Is Promoted through Projects in English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP) Courses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essential Competencies for English-medium University Teaching

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 27))

  • 1720 Accesses

Abstract

Students’ ability to develop their English and function without assistance from teachers during their academic studies and professional lives is an objective within the context of language learning in higher education, especially in an English Medium Instruction setting. This chapter aims to show, with practical examples, how projects customized to students’ specific needs in various disciplines, at the end of advanced level English for Specific Academic Purposes courses, can promote student autonomy. By working through the project process, which enables students to choose their topic and materials, synthesize skills and strategies from the course and apply diverse resources in a learner-centred approach, students are engaged in challenging tasks which allow them to practise language skills in a natural setting. Furthermore, projects can increase effectiveness of the course by utilizing new technologies and encouraging autonomy, through self-access, self-monitoring and collaboration in real-life tasks, thereby placing more responsibility on the student. In light of shifting language needs in the academic and work environments, the roles and responsibilities of the language instructor and student should be reevaluated, considering more student-centred approaches for preparing undergraduates with language skills for their studies and for the workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (2005). The project framework: A tool for language, content, and skills integration. English Language Teaching Journal, 59(2), 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21–40. doi:10.1017/S)261444806003958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. (2012). Autonomy in language learning, learning and life. Synergies France, 9, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Introduction: Autonomy and independence in language learning. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 1–12). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 120th Annual ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.asee.org/file_server/papers/attachment/file/0003/3259/6219.pdf

  • Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for learner autonomy: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505–518. doi:10.1080/13562510120078045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (2007). Language matters in global communication. Journal of Business Communication, 44(3), 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciekanski, M. (2007). Fostering learner autonomy: Power and reciprocity in the relationship between language learner and language learning adviser. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(1), 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54(2), 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (1998). Committee of ministers recommendation R(98)6 to member states concerning Modern Languages (Adopted 17 March 1998). Retrieved 1 July, 2014, from: https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&InstranetImage=530647&SecMode=1&DocId=459522&Usage=2

  • Dam, L., Eriksson, R., Little, D., Miliander, J., & Trebbi, T. (1990). Towards a definition of autonomy. In T. Trebbi (Ed.), Third Nordic workshop on developing autonomous learning in the FL classroom. Bergen, August 11–14, 1989: Report. Bergen, Norway. Retrieved 24 June, 2014, from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/groups/ellta/circal/dahla/archive/trebbi_1990

  • Iakovos, T., Iosif, F., & Areti, K. (2011). Content-based instruction in the teaching of English as a foreign language. Review of European Studies, 3(1), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IllĂ©s, E. (2012). Learner autonomy revisited. ELT Journal, 66(4), 505–513. doi:10.1093/elt/ccs044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T. (2010). Integrating project-based learning into a traditional skills-based curriculum to foster learner autonomy: An action research. The Journal of Kanda University of International Studies, 22, 221–244. Retrieved June 19, 2014, from http://www3.kandagaigo.ac.jp/kuis/about/bulletin/jp/022/pdf/011.pdf

  • Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192–203). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peñaflorida, A. H. (2002). Nontraditional forms of assessment and response to student writing: A step toward learner autonomy. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 344–353). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raisanen, C., & Fortanet-Gomez, I. (2008). English for specific purposes after the Bologna reform. In I. Fortanet-Gomez & C. Raisanen (Eds.), ESP in European higher education: Integrating language and content (pp. 1–7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–205). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for leaner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 25(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte/2010v35n5.4.

  • Snodin, N. S. (2013). The effects of blended learning with a CMS on the development of autonomous learning: A case study of different degrees of autonomy achieved by individual learners. Computers & Education, 61, 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, F. L. (2002). Project work: A means to promote language and content. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 107–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Symon, M., & Broido, M. (2014). Changing worlds, changing needs: EFL provision. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 18(2), 126–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symon, M., & Weinberg, L. (2013). Teaching in English: Perceptions from Israel. Forum Winter, 2013, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11). Retrieved June 24, 2015. from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Thanasoulas-Autonomy.html

  • Voller, P. (1997). Does the teacher have a role in autonomous language learning? In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 98–113). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miriam Symon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Symon, M. (2017). Reevaluating the Roles of the Stakeholders in Language Education: How Student Autonomy Is Promoted through Projects in English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP) Courses. In: Breeze, R., Sancho Guinda, C. (eds) Essential Competencies for English-medium University Teaching. Educational Linguistics, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40956-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40956-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40954-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40956-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics