Abstract
Students’ ability to develop their English and function without assistance from teachers during their academic studies and professional lives is an objective within the context of language learning in higher education, especially in an English Medium Instruction setting. This chapter aims to show, with practical examples, how projects customized to students’ specific needs in various disciplines, at the end of advanced level English for Specific Academic Purposes courses, can promote student autonomy. By working through the project process, which enables students to choose their topic and materials, synthesize skills and strategies from the course and apply diverse resources in a learner-centred approach, students are engaged in challenging tasks which allow them to practise language skills in a natural setting. Furthermore, projects can increase effectiveness of the course by utilizing new technologies and encouraging autonomy, through self-access, self-monitoring and collaboration in real-life tasks, thereby placing more responsibility on the student. In light of shifting language needs in the academic and work environments, the roles and responsibilities of the language instructor and student should be reevaluated, considering more student-centred approaches for preparing undergraduates with language skills for their studies and for the workplace.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (2005). The project framework: A tool for language, content, and skills integration. English Language Teaching Journal, 59(2), 108–116.
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21–40. doi:10.1017/S)261444806003958.
Benson, P. (2012). Autonomy in language learning, learning and life. Synergies France, 9, 29–39.
Benson, P., & Voller, P. (1997). Introduction: Autonomy and independence in language learning. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 1–12). London: Longman.
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 120th Annual ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition; American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from http://www.asee.org/file_server/papers/attachment/file/0003/3259/6219.pdf
Chan, V. (2001). Readiness for learner autonomy: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 505–518. doi:10.1080/13562510120078045.
Charles, M. (2007). Language matters in global communication. Journal of Business Communication, 44(3), 260–282.
Ciekanski, M. (2007). Fostering learner autonomy: Power and reciprocity in the relationship between language learner and language learning adviser. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(1), 111–127.
Cotterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal, 54(2), 109–117.
Council of Europe. (1998). Committee of ministers recommendation R(98)6 to member states concerning Modern Languages (Adopted 17 March 1998). Retrieved 1 July, 2014, from: https://wcd.coe.int/com.instranet.InstraServlet?command=com.instranet.CmdBlobGet&InstranetImage=530647&SecMode=1&DocId=459522&Usage=2
Dam, L., Eriksson, R., Little, D., Miliander, J., & Trebbi, T. (1990). Towards a definition of autonomy. In T. Trebbi (Ed.), Third Nordic workshop on developing autonomous learning in the FL classroom. Bergen, August 11–14, 1989: Report. Bergen, Norway. Retrieved 24 June, 2014, from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/groups/ellta/circal/dahla/archive/trebbi_1990
Iakovos, T., Iosif, F., & Areti, K. (2011). Content-based instruction in the teaching of English as a foreign language. Review of European Studies, 3(1), 115–121.
Illés, E. (2012). Learner autonomy revisited. ELT Journal, 66(4), 505–513. doi:10.1093/elt/ccs044.
McCarthy, T. (2010). Integrating project-based learning into a traditional skills-based curriculum to foster learner autonomy: An action research. The Journal of Kanda University of International Studies, 22, 221–244. Retrieved June 19, 2014, from http://www3.kandagaigo.ac.jp/kuis/about/bulletin/jp/022/pdf/011.pdf
Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage learner autonomy. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192–203). London: Longman.
Peñaflorida, A. H. (2002). Nontraditional forms of assessment and response to student writing: A step toward learner autonomy. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 344–353). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Raisanen, C., & Fortanet-Gomez, I. (2008). English for specific purposes after the Bologna reform. In I. Fortanet-Gomez & C. Raisanen (Eds.), ESP in European higher education: Integrating language and content (pp. 1–7). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–205). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.
Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a classroom pedagogy for leaner autonomy: A framework of independent language learning skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 25(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte/2010v35n5.4.
Snodin, N. S. (2013). The effects of blended learning with a CMS on the development of autonomous learning: A case study of different degrees of autonomy achieved by individual learners. Computers & Education, 61, 209–216.
Stoller, F. L. (2002). Project work: A means to promote language and content. In J. Richards & W. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 107–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Symon, M., & Broido, M. (2014). Changing worlds, changing needs: EFL provision. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 18(2), 126–131.
Symon, M., & Weinberg, L. (2013). Teaching in English: Perceptions from Israel. Forum Winter, 2013, 22–24.
Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11). Retrieved June 24, 2015. from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Thanasoulas-Autonomy.html
Voller, P. (1997). Does the teacher have a role in autonomous language learning? In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 98–113). London: Longman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Symon, M. (2017). Reevaluating the Roles of the Stakeholders in Language Education: How Student Autonomy Is Promoted through Projects in English for Specific Academic Purposes (ESAP) Courses. In: Breeze, R., Sancho Guinda, C. (eds) Essential Competencies for English-medium University Teaching. Educational Linguistics, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40956-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40956-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40954-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40956-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)