Advertisement

Big Data and Urban Informatics: Innovations and Challenges to Urban Planning and Knowledge Discovery

Chapter
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)

Abstract

Big Data is the term being used to describe a wide spectrum of observational or “naturally-occurring” data generated through transactional, operational, planning and social activities that are not specifically designed for research. Due to the structure and access conditions associated with such data, their use for research and analysis becomes significantly complicated. New sources of Big Data are rapidly emerging as a result of technological, institutional, social, and business innovations. The objective of this background paper is to describe emerging sources of Big Data, their use in urban research, and the challenges that arise with their use. To a certain extent, Big Data in the urban context has become narrowly associated with sensor (e.g., Internet of Things) or socially generated (e.g., social media or citizen science) data. However, there are many other sources of observational data that are meaningful to different groups of urban researchers and user communities. Examples include privately held transactions data, confidential administrative micro-data, data from arts and humanities collections, and hybrid data consisting of synthetic or linked data.

The emerging area of Urban Informatics focuses on the exploration and understanding of urban systems by leveraging novel sources of data. The major potential of Urban Informatics research and applications is in four areas: (1) improved strategies for dynamic urban resource management, (2) theoretical insights and knowledge discovery of urban patterns and processes, (3) strategies for urban engagement and civic participation, and (4) innovations in urban management, and planning and policy analysis. Urban Informatics utilizes Big Data in innovative ways by retrofitting or repurposing existing urban models and simulations that are underpinned by a wide range of theoretical traditions, as well as through data-driven modeling approaches that are largely theory agnostic, although these divergent research approaches are starting to converge in some ways. The paper surveys the kinds of urban problems being considered by going from a data-poor environment to a data-rich world and the ways in which such enquiries have the potential to enhance our understanding, not only of urban systems and processes overall, but also contextual peculiarities and local experiences. The paper concludes by commenting on challenges that are likely to arise in varying degrees when using Big Data for Urban Informatics: technological, methodological, theoretical/epistemological, and the emerging political economy of Big Data.

Keywords

Big Data Urban Informatics Knowledge discovery Dynamic resource management User generated content 

References

  1. Abascal J, Bonail B, Marco Á, Casas R, JL Sevillano (2008). AmbienNet: an intelligent environment to support people with disabilities and elderly people. In: Proceedings of tenth international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (Assets ’08), pp 293–294Google Scholar
  2. Abowd JM, Stephens BE, Vilhuber L, Andersson F, McKinney KL, Roemer M, Woodcock S (2005) The LEHD infrastructure files and the creation of the quarterly workforce indicators. In: Producer dynamics: new evidence from micro data. Published 2009 by University of Chicago Press, pp 149–230. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0485.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2014
  3. Federal Interagency Forum on Aging-Related Statistics (2010) Older American 2010: key indicators of well-being. http://www.agingstats.gov/agingstatsdotnet/Main_Site/Data/2010_Documents/Docs/OA_2010.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2010
  4. Aguilera O, Fernández AF, Muñoz A, Fraga MF (2010) Epigenetics and environment: a complex relationship. J Appl Physiol 109(1):243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alonso W (1960) A theory of the urban land market. Pap Reg Sci 6(1):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. American Academy of the Arts and Sciences (2013) The heart of the matter. http://www.amacad.org. Accessed 1 April 2015
  7. Anderson C (2008) The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired Magazine, 23 June 2008. http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory. Accessed 10 Feb 2012
  8. Antenucci D, Cafarella M, Levenstein MC, Ré C, Shapiro MD (2014) Using social media to measure labor market flows. Report of the University of Michigan node of the NSF-Census Research Network (NCRN) supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SES 1131500Google Scholar
  9. Ashton K (2009) That “Internet of Things” Thing. RFID Journal, May/June 2009Google Scholar
  10. Balmer M, Rieser M, Meister K, Charypar D, Lefebvre N, Nagel K, Axhausen K (2009) MATSim-T: architecture and simulation times. In: Multi-agent systems for traffic and transportation engineering. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Batty M (2013) Urban informatics and Big Data: a report to the ESRC Cities Expert Group. http://www.smartcitiesappg.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Urban-Informatics-and-Big-Data.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2014
  12. Bays J, Callanan L (2012) ‘Urban informatics’ can help cities run more efficiently. McKinsey on Society. http://mckinseyonsociety.com/emerging-trends-in-urban-informatics/. Accessed 1 July 2014
  13. BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT (2013) The societal impact of the internet of things. www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/societal-impact-report-feb13.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2015
  14. Beckman MJ, McGuire CB, Winston CB (1956) Studies in the economics of transportation. Yale University Press, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  15. Beckman R, Baggerly KA, McKay MD (1996) Creating synthetic baseline populations. Transp Res A Policy Pract 30(6):415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Beckmann MJ (1973) Equilibrium models of residential location. Reg Urban Econ 3:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman SR (1985) Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Beresford AR, Stajano F (2003) Location privacy in pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Comput 2(1):46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bijwaard GE, Schluter C, Wahba J (2011) The impact of labour market dynamics on the return—migration of immigrants. CReAM Discussion Paper No. 27/12Google Scholar
  20. Black K (2008) Health and aging-in-place: implications for community practice. J Commun Pract 16(1):79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bonney R, Ballard H, Jordan R, McCallie E, Phillips T, Shirk J, Wilderman CC (2009) Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Technical report, Center for Advancement of Informal Science EducationGoogle Scholar
  22. Bottoms AE, Costello A (2009) Crime prevention and the understanding of repeat victimization: a longitudinal study. In: Knepper P, Doak J, Shapland J (eds) Urban crime prevention, surveillance, and restorative justice: effects of social technologies. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 23–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bottrill C (2006) Understanding DTQs and PCAs. Technical report, Environmental Change. Institute/UKERC, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  24. Burgess EW (1925) The growth of the city: an introduction to a research project. In: Park RE, Burgess EW, Mackenzie RD (eds) The city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 47–62Google Scholar
  25. Card D, Chetty R, Feldstein M, Saez E (n.d.) Expanding access to administrative data for research in the United States. NSF-SBE 2020 White Paper. http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/all.cfm. Accessed 10 April 2015
  26. Celino I, Contessa S, Della Valle E, Krüger T, Corubolo M, Fumeo S (2012) UrbanMatch—linking and improving Smart Cities Data. LDOW2012, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
  27. U.S. Census Bureau (2012) Press release, 22 May 2012. https://www.census.gov/2010census/news/releases/operations/cb12-95.html
  28. CERI/OECD (1992) City strategies for lifelong learning. In: A CERI/OECD study No. 3 in a series of publications from the Second congress on educating cities, Gothenburg, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  29. Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med 357(4):370–379Google Scholar
  30. Consolvo S, Everitt K, Smith I, Landay JA (2006) Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’06), pp 457–466Google Scholar
  31. Conway J (1970) The game of life. Sci Am 223(4):4Google Scholar
  32. Cottrill CD, Thakuriah P (2015) Location privacy preferences: a survey-based analysis of consumer awareness, trade-off and decision-making. Transp Res C Emerg Technol 56:132–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Culotta A (2014) Reducing sampling bias in social media data for county health inference. In: JSM proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  34. Davenport TH, Patil DJ (2012) Data scientist: the sexiest job of the 21st century. Harvard Business Review, October, pp 70–76Google Scholar
  35. Dekel O, Shamir O (2009) Vox Populi: collecting high-quality labels from a crowd. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on learning theory (COLT), pp 377–386. http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~colt2009/proceedings.html
  36. De Mauro A, Greco M, Grimaldi M (2015) What is big data? A consensual definition and a review of key research topics. In: AIP conference proceedings, 1644, pp 97–104Google Scholar
  37. NAREC Distributed Energy (2013) ERDF social housing energy management project—final project report. UK National Renewable Energy Centre. https://ore.catapult.org.uk/documents/10619/127231/Social%20Housing%20final%20report/6ca05e01-49cc-43ca-a78c-27fe0e2dd239. Accessed 1 April 2015
  38. Drake JS, Schofer JL, May A, May AD (1965) Chicago area expressway surveillance project, and Expressway Surveillance Project (Ill.). A statistical analysis of speed-density hypotheses: a summary. Report (Expressway Surveillance Project (Ill.)). Expressway Surveillance ProjectGoogle Scholar
  39. Ellis RH (1967) Modelling of household location: a statistical approach. Highw Res Rec 207:42–51Google Scholar
  40. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (n.d) Framework for responsible innovation. https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/research/framework/. Accessed 10 April 2015
  41. Erlander S (1980) Optimal spatial interaction and the gravity model. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 173. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  42. European Commission (2015) Digital agenda for Europe: a Europe 2020 initiative: European Innovation Partnership (EIP) on Smart Cities and Communities. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/smart-cities. Accessed 1 Aug 2015
  43. Evans TP, Kelley H (2004) Multi-scale analysis of a household level agent-based model of landcover change. J Environ Manage 72(1):57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Evans E, Grella CE, Murphy DA, Hser Y-I (2010) Using administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research. J Behav Health Serv Res 37(2):252–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Foth M, Choi JH, Satchell C (2011) Urban informatics. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ’11). ACM, New York, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  46. Fujita M (1988) A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration: differentiated product approach. Reg Sci Urban Econ 18(1):87–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fujita M, Ogawa H (1982) Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations. Reg Sci Urban Econ 12(2):161–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Ghosh D, Guha R (2013) What are we tweeting about obesity? Mapping tweets with topic modeling and geographic information system. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 40(2):90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Girvan M, Newman ME (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(12):7821–7826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gjoka M, Kurant M, Butts CT, Markopoulou A (2010) Walking in Facebook: a case study of unbiased sampling of OSNs. In: Proceedings of IEEE 2010 INFOCOM 2010Google Scholar
  52. OECD Global Science Forum (2013) New data for understanding the human condition: international perspectives. Report on data and research infrastructure for the social sciences. http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/new-data-for-understanding-the-human-condition.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2015
  53. Golbeck J, Hansen D (2013) A method for computing political preference among Twitter followers. Soc Netw 36:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gowans H, Elliot M, Dibben C, Lightfoot D (2012) Accessing and sharing administrative data and the need for data security, Administrative Data Liaison ServiceGoogle Scholar
  55. Gruteser M, Grunwald D (2003) Anonymous usage of location-based services through spatial and temporal cloaking. In: Proceedings of first international conference on mobile systems, applications and services, MobiSys ’03, pp 31–42Google Scholar
  56. Gurstein M (2011) Open data: empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday, vol 16, no 2, 7 Feb 2011. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3316/2764. Accessed 1 July 2013
  57. Haque U (2012) Surely there’s a smarter approach to smart cities? Wired Magazine. 17 April 2012. http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-04/17/potential-of-smarter-cities-beyond-ibm-and-cisco. Accessed 10 April 2012
  58. Harland K, Heppenstall A, Smith D, Birkin M (2012) Creating realistic synthetic populations at varying spatial scales: a comparative critique of population synthesis techniques. J Artif Soc Soc Simul, vol 15(1):1. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/15/1/1.html. Accessed 19 April 2015
  59. Hendler J (2014) Data integration for heterogeneous datasets. Big Data 2(4):205–215Google Scholar
  60. Hey T, Tansley S, Tolle K (2009) The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. Microsoft Research, RedmondGoogle Scholar
  61. Hoadley CM, Bell P (1996) Web for your head: the design of digital resources to enhance lifelong learning. D-Lib Magazine, September. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september96/kie/09hoadley.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2015
  62. Hollands RG (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, vol 12(3), pp 303–320Google Scholar
  63. Huang DL, Rosenberg DE, Simonovich SD, Belza B (2012) Food access patterns and barriers among midlife and older adults with mobility disabilities. J Aging Res 2012:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Huijboom N, van den Broek T (2011). Open data: an international comparison of strategies. Eur J ePractice, vol 12, March/April 2011Google Scholar
  65. Isard W (1956) Location and space-economy. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Jia T, Jiang B, Carling K, Bolin M, Ban YF (2012) An empirical study on human mobility and its agent-based modeling. J Stat Mech Theory Exp P11024Google Scholar
  67. Kain JF, Persky JJ (1969) Alternatives to the “Gilded Ghetto”. In The Public Interest, Winter, pp 77–91Google Scholar
  68. Kempton W, Letendre SE (1997) Electric vehicles as a new power source for electric utilities. Transp Res D Transp Environ 2(3):157–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kempton W, Tomic J (2005) Vehicle-To-Grid power fundamentals: calculating capacity and net revenue. J Power Sources 144(1):268–279Google Scholar
  70. Kinney R, Crucitti P, Albert R, Latora V (2005) Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid. Eur Phys J B 46(1):101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kinsley S (n.d.) A political economy of Twitter data? Conducting research with proprietary data is neither easy nor free. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/12/30/a-political-economy-of-twitter-data/. Accessed 1 April 2015
  72. Knoll M (2008) Diabetes city: how urban game design strategies can help diabetics. In: eHealth’08, pp 200–204Google Scholar
  73. Kowald M, Axhausen KW (2015) Social networks and travel behaviour. Ashgate, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  74. Krivo LJ, Peterson RD (1996) Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Soc Forces 75:619–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  76. Laney D (2001) 3-D data management: controlling data volume, velocity and variety. Application delivery strategies by META Group Inc., February, p 949Google Scholar
  77. Lee DB Jr (1973) Requiem for large-scale models. J Am Inst Plann 39:163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Levinson D, Marion B, Iacono M (2010) Access to destinations, phase 3: measuring accessibility by automobile. http://www.cts.umn.edu/Research/ProjectDetail.html?id=2009012
  79. Lightfoot D, Dibben C (2013) Approaches to linking administrative records to studies and surveys—a review. Administrative Data Liaison Service, University of St Andrews. https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Approaches+to+linking+administrative+records+to+studies+and+surveys+-+a+review&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=rfxFVZWeM4KUaumTgdAC#. Accessed 15 March 2015Google Scholar
  80. Lin Y, Jessurun J, de Vries B, Timmermans H (2011) Motivate: towards context-aware recommendation mobile system for healthy living. In: 2011 fifth international conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pp 250–253Google Scholar
  81. Liu B (2007) Web data mining: data-centric systems and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  82. Lowry IS (1964) A model of metropolis. The Rand Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  83. Ludwig Y, Zenker B, Schrader J (2009) Recommendation of personalized routes with public transport connections. In: Tavangarian D, Kirste T, Timmermann D, Lucke U, Versick D (eds) Intelligent interactive assistance and mobile multimedia computing of communications in computer and information science, vol 53. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–107Google Scholar
  84. Lundquist D (2011) Pollution credit trading in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. http://connected.vehicle.challenge.gov/submissions/2926-pollution-credit-trading-in-vehicular-ad-hocnetworks
  85. Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  86. Miller H, Goodchild MF (2014) Data-driven geography. GeoJournal, October, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  87. Mislove A, Lehmann S, Ahn Y, Onnela J, Rosenquist JN (2011) Understanding the demographics of twitter users. In: Proceedings of the fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM’11), Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  88. Moor JH (2005) Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies. Ethics Inf Technol 7:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Museum of the City of New York (2014) Museum of the City of New York receives grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities to process, catalog, digitize and rehouse the Ephemera Collections. http://www.mcny.org/sites/default/files/Press_Release_NEH_Grant_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 5 April 2015
  90. Muth RF (1969) Cities and housing: the spatial pattern of urban residential land use. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  91. Naylor J, Swier N, Williams S, Gask K, Breton R (2015) ONS Big Data Project—progress report: Qtr 4 October to Dec 2014. ONS Big Data Project Qtr 4 Report. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/about-ons/who-ons-are/programmes-and-projects/the-ons-big-data-project/index.html. Accessed 15 April 2015
  92. Office for National Statistics (2015) Beyond 2011 research strategy and plan—2015 to 2017. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/about-ons/who-ons-are/programmes-and-projects/beyond-2011/reports-and-publications/research-strategy-and-plan---2015-2017.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2015
  93. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Global Science Forum (2011) Effective modelling of urban systems to address the challenges of climate change and sustainability, October 2011. www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/49352636.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2013
  94. Ortega F, Gonzalez-Barahona J, Robles G (2008) On the inequality of contributions to Wikipedia. In: HICSS ‘08 Proceedings of 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p 304Google Scholar
  95. Picciano AG (2012) The evolution of Big Data and learning analytics in American Higher Education. J Asynchronous Learn Netw 16(3):9–20Google Scholar
  96. Pietsch W (2013) Big Data—the new science of complexity. In: Sixth Munich-Sydney-Tilburg conference on models and decisions, Munich, 10–12 April 2013. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9944/. Accessed 1 April 2015
  97. Poplin A (2014) Digital serious game for urban planning: B3—design your marketplace! Environ Plann B Plann Design 41(3):493–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Pyrozhenko V (2011) Implementing open government: exploring the ideological links between open government and the free and open source software movement. Prepared for 11th Annual public management meetingGoogle Scholar
  99. Quinn AJ, Bederson BB (2011) Human computation: a survey and taxonomy of a growing field. In: Proceedings of annual conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’11), pp 1403–1412Google Scholar
  100. Rae A (2014) Online housing search and the geography of submarkets. Hous Stud 30(3):453–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rand W, Herrmann J, Schein B, Vodopivec N (2015) An agent-based model of urgent diffusion in social media. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 18(2):1Google Scholar
  102. Raykar VC, Yu S, Zhao LH, Valadez GH, Florin C, Bogoni L, Moy L (2010) Learning from crowds. J Mac Learn Res 11:1297–1322Google Scholar
  103. Reinhardt J, Miller J, Stucki G, Sykes C, Gray D (2011) Measuring impact of environmental factors on human functioning and disability: a review of various scientific approaches. Disabil Rehabil 33(23-24):2151–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Reist BH, Ciango A (2013) Innovations in census taking for the United States in 2020. In: Proceedings of 59th ISI World Statistics Congress, Hong Kong. http://www.statistics.gov.hk/wsc/STS017-P2-S.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2015
  105. Richardson HW (1977) A generalization of residential location theory. Reg Sci Urban Econ 7:251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Robinson J (2014) New geographies of theorizing the urban: putting comparison to work for global urban studies. In: Parnell S, Oldfield S (eds) The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south. Routledge, New York, pp 57–70Google Scholar
  107. Roy A (2009) The 21st century metropolis: new geographies of theory. Reg Stud 43(6):819–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Salasznyk PP, Lee EE, List GF, Wallace WA (2006) A systems view of data integration for emergency response. Int J Emerg Manage 3(4):313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Salvini P, Miller EJ (2005) ILUTE: an operational prototype of a comprehensive microsimulation model of urban systems. Netw Spat Econ 5(2):217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sasaki K, Nagano S, Ueno K, Cho K (2012) Feasibility study on detection of transportation information exploiting Twitter as a sensor. In: Sixth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Workshop on when the city meets the citizen, AAAI technical report WS-12-0Google Scholar
  111. Schelling TC (1971) Dynamic models of segregation. J Math Sociol 1(2):143–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sen A, Smith TE (1995) Gravity models of spatial interaction behavior, Advances in spatial and network economics series. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Sheffi Y (1985) Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  114. Shkabatur J (2013) Transparency with(out) accountability: open government in the United States. Yale Law & Policy Review, vol 31, 25 March 2012Google Scholar
  115. Smith RJ (2014) Missed miracles and mystical connections: qualitative research and digital social sciences and big data. In: Hand M, Hillyard S (eds) Big Data?: Qualitative approaches to digital research. Edward Group, pp 181–204. http://www.eblib.com. Accessed 1 Aug 2015
  116. Tang KP, Lin J, Hong JI, Siewiorek DP, Sadeh N (2010) Rethinking location sharing: exploring the implications of social-driven vs. purpose-driven location sharing. In: Proceedings of 12th ACM international conference on ubiquitous computing (Ubicomp ’10), pp 85–94Google Scholar
  117. Thakuriah P, Geers G (2013) Transportation and information: trends in technology and policy. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Thakuriah P, Mallon-Keita Y (2014) An analysis of household transportation spending during the 2007-2009 US economic recession. In: Transportation Research Board 93rd annual meeting, Washington, DC, 12–16 Jan 2014Google Scholar
  119. Thakuriah P, Tilahun N (2013) Incorporating weather information into real-time speed estimates: comparison of alternative models. J Transp Eng 139(4):379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Thakuriah P, Soot S, Cottrill C, Tilahun N, Blaise T, Vassilakis W (2011) Integrated and continuing transportation services for seniors: case studies of new freedom program. Transp Res Rec 2265:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Thakuriah P, Persky J, Soot S, Sriraj P (2013) Costs and benefits of employment transportation for low-wage workers: an assessment of job access public transportation services. Eval Program Plann 37:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Thakuriah P, Dirks L, Mallon-Keita Y (2016) Digital Infomediaries and Civic Hacking in Emerging Urban Data Initiatives. In Thakuriah P, Tilahun N, Zellner M (eds) Seeing cities through big data: research, methods and applications in urban informatics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  123. Thakuriah P, Sila-Nowicka K, Gonzalez Paule J (forthcoming) Sensing Spatiotemporal Patterns in Urban Areas: Analytics and Visualizations Using the Integrated Multimedia City Data Platform. In Big Data and the City, a special issue of Built Environment.Google Scholar
  124. Thanos C, Rauber A (2015) Scientific data sharing and re-use. ERCIM News, no. 100, 13 Jan 2015Google Scholar
  125. Thorhildur J, Avital M, BjÃrn-Andersen N (2013) The generative mechanisms of open government data. In: ECIS 2013 proceedings, Paper 179Google Scholar
  126. Tilahun N, Levinson D (2013) An agent-based model of origin destination estimation (ABODE). J Transp Land Use 6(1):73–88Google Scholar
  127. Townsend A (2013) Smart cities: Big Data, civic hackers and the quest for a New Utopia. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  128. Tukey JW (1980) We need both exploratory and confirmatory. Am Stat 34(1):23–25Google Scholar
  129. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World Urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352)Google Scholar
  130. Urban Big Data Centre (n.d.) Integrated Multimedia City Data (iMCD). http://ubdc.ac.uk/research/research-projects/methods-research/integrated-multimedia-city-data-imcd/. Accessed 18 September 2016
  131. Vitrano FA, Chapin MM (2010) Possible 2020 census designs and the use of administrative records: what is the impact on cost and quality? U.S. Census Bureau, Suitland. https://fcsm.sites.usa.gov/files/2014/05/Chapin_2012FCSM_III-A.pdf Google Scholar
  132. Vitrano FA, Chapin MM (2014) Possible 2020 census designs and the use of administrative records: what is the impact on cost and quality? https://fcsm.sites.usa.gov/files/2014/05/Chapin_2012FCSM_III-A.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2015
  133. von Ahn L, Blum M, Hopper NJ, Langford J (2003) CAPTCHA: using hard AI problems for security. Technical Report 136Google Scholar
  134. von Ahn L, Maurer B, McMillen C, Abraham D, Blum M (2008) reCAPTCHA: human-based character recognition via web security measures. Science 321(5895):1465–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Wauthier FL, Jordan MI (2011) Bayesian bias mitigation for crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the conference on neural information processing system, no 24, pp 1800–1808. http://machinelearning.wustl.edu/mlpapers/papers/NIPS2011_1021
  136. Wegener M (1994) Operational urban models state of the art. J Am Plann Assoc 60(1):17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Weil R, Wootton J, Garca-Ortiz A (1998) Traffic incident detection: sensors and algorithms. Math Comput Model 27(911):257–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Williams JD (2012) The 2010 decennial census: background and issues. Congressional Research Service R40551. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40551.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2015
  139. Wilson AG (1971) A family of spatial interaction models, and associated developments. Environ Plann 3(1):1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Wilson WJ (1987) The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass and public policy Chicago. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  141. Wilson AG (2013) A modeller’s utopia: combinatorial evolution. Commentary. Environ Plann A 45:1262–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Wu G, Talwar S, Johnsson K, Himayat N, Johnson KD (2011) M2m: from mobile to embedded internet. IEEE Communications Magazine 49(4):36–43, AprilGoogle Scholar
  143. Zellner ML, Reeves HW (2012) Examining the contradiction in ‘sustainable urban growth’: an example of groundwater sustainability. J Environ Plann Manage 55(5):545–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Zellner ML, Page SE, Rand W, Brown DG, Robinson DT, Nassauer J, Low B (2009) The emergence of zoning games in exurban jurisdictions. Land Use Policy 26(2009):356–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Zellner ML, Lyons L, Hoch CJ, Weizeorick J, Kunda C, Milz D (2012) Modeling, learning and planning together: an application of participatory agent-based modeling to environmental planning. URISA J (GIS in Spatial Planning Issue) 24(1):77–92Google Scholar
  146. Zellner M, Massey D, Shiftan Y, Levine J, Arquero M (2016) Overcoming the last-mile problem with transportation and land-use improvements: an agent-based approach. Int J Transport 4(1):1–26Google Scholar
  147. Zhang X, Qin S, Dong B, Ran B (2010) Daily OD matrix estimation using cellular probe data. In: Proceedings of ninth annual meeting Transportation Research BoardGoogle Scholar
  148. Zheng Y, Xie X (2011) Location-based social networks: locations. In: Zheng Y, Zhou X (eds) Computing with spatial trajectories. Springer, New York, pp 277–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban Studies and Urban Big Data CentreUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department or Urban Planning and PolicyCollege or Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations