Advertisement

Problem Behavior Theory and Adolescent Development

  • Richard JessorEmail author
  • Shirley L. Jessor
Chapter
Part of the Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development book series (ARAD)

Abstract

This chapter is a summary of the theory and research findings from the Socialization of Problem Behavior in Youth Study. It reviews the contributions of the Personality System variables and the Perceived Environment System variables in Problem Behavior Theory to an explanation of problem behavior in samples of adolescents in High School and young people in College in a university community in the Rocky Mountain region. Although each theoretical system provides a significant account of problem behavior variation, in both samples and for both sexes, their combined contribution is larger than that of either alone. The pattern of findings supports the usefulness of the new concept, ‘problem behavior syndrome,’ to reflect the co-variation that obtained among various problem behaviors in both samples. It also supports the new concept of ‘transition proneness,’ the pattern of theoretical attributes reflecting a readiness to make a developmental transition. The chapter elaborates the developmental and predictive results of this four-wave, longitudinal study and makes clear, for the first time, the developmental relevance of Problem Behavior Theory.

Keywords

Problem Behavior Theory Personality system Perceived environment system Developmental curves Transition proneness Problem behavior syndrome Distal structure Proximal structure 

References

  1. Baltes, P. B., Cornelius, S. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1978). Cohort effects in behavioral development: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–63). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Block, J. (1971). Lives through time. Berkeley: Bancroft Books.Google Scholar
  3. Braucht, G. N. (1974). A psychosocial typology of adolescent alcohol and drug users. In M. E. Chafetz (Ed.), Alcoholism: A multilevel problem. Proceedings of the Third Annual Alcoholism Conference. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (pp. 129–144). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  4. Chase, J. A., & Jessor, R. (1977). A social-psychological analysis of marijuana involvement among a national sample of adolescents. Unpublished report to National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Contract No. ADM 281-75-0028, January, pp. 1–99.Google Scholar
  5. Donovan, J. E. (1977). A typological study of self-reported deviance in a national sample of adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  6. Donovan, J. E., & Jessor, R. (1976). Problem drinking among adolescents: A social-psychological study of a national sample. Unpublished report to National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Contract No. ADM 281-75-0028, July, pp. 1–116.Google Scholar
  7. Elliott, D. S., & Voss, H. L. (1974). Delinquency and dropout. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  8. Jessor, R., Graves, T. D., Hanson, R. C., & Jessor, S. L. (1968). Society, personality, and deviant behavior: A study of a tri-ethnic community. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Reprinted by Krieger Publishing Co., 645 New York Ave., Huntington, NY, 1975.)Google Scholar
  9. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1973). The perceived environment in behavioral science: Some conceptual issues and some illustrative data. American Behavioral Scientist, 16, 801–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1978). Theory testing in longitudinal research on marijuana use. In D. B. Kandel (Ed.), Longitudinal research on drug use: Empirical findings and methodological issues (pp. 41–71). Washington, DC: Hemisphere (Wiley).Google Scholar
  11. Kandel, D. B. (1978). Convergences in prospective longitudinal surveys of drug use in normal populations. In D. B. Kandel (Ed.), Longitudinal research on drug use: Empirical findings and methodological issues (pp. 3–38). Washington, DC: Hemisphere (Wiley).Google Scholar
  12. Kenny, D. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 887–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nesselroade, J. R., & Baltes, P. B. (1974). Adolescent personality development and historical change: 1970–1972. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (Serial No. 154, Vol. 39, pp. 1–80).Google Scholar
  14. Rachal, J. V., Williams, J. R., Brehm, M. L., Cavanaugh, B., Moore, R. P., & Eckerman, W. C. (1975). A national study of adolescent drinking behavior, attitudes, and correlates. (Prepared for National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Rep. No. PB-246-002; NIAAA/NCALI-75/27). Springfield, VA.: U.S. National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
  15. Sadava, S. W. (1973). Initiation to cannabis use: A longitudinal social psychological study of college freshmen. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 5, 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Simmons, J. L., & Winograd, B. (1966). It’s happening: A portrait of the youth scene today. Santa Barbara, CA: Marc-Laird Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Suchman, E. A. (1968). The “hang-loose” ethic and the spirit of drug use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 9, 146–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Winick, C. (1975). Speculations on possible changes in youthful life-styles between the 1960’s and 1970’s. In D. J. Lettieri (Ed.), Predicting adolescent drug abuse: A review of issues, methods and correlates (National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Issue Series No. 11, pp. 55–60). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.University of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations