Advertisement

Problem Behavior Theory and Adolescent Pro-Social Behavior

  • Richard JessorEmail author
  • Mark S. Turbin
Chapter
Part of the Advancing Responsible Adolescent Development book series (ARAD)

Abstract

This study investigates the different roles played by protective factors and risk factors—and by particular protective and risk factors—when the concern is with accounting for adolescent problem behavior than when the concern is with accounting for adolescent pro-social behavior. The protective and risk factor literature on adolescent problem behavior reveals considerable conceptual and operational ambiguity; an aim of the present study was to advance understanding in this domain of inquiry by providing a systematic conceptualization of protection and risk and of their measurement. Within the systematic framework of Problem Behavior Theory, four protective and four risk factors are assessed in a cross-national study of both problem behavior and pro-social behavior involving large adolescent samples in China (N = 1368) and the US (N = 1087), in grades 9, 10, and 11; females 56 %, US; 50 %, China. The findings reveal quite different roles for protection and risk, and for particular protective and risk factors, when the outcome criterion is problem behavior than when it is pro-social behavior. The protective factor, Controls Protection, which engages rule and regulations and sanctions in the adolescent’s ecology, emerges as most important in influencing problem behavior, but it plays a relatively minor role in relationship to pro-social behavior. By contrast, Models Protection, the presence of pro-social models in the adolescent’s ecology, and Support Protection, the presence of interest and care in that same ecology, have no significant relationship to problem behavior variation, but they are both the major predictors of variation in pro-social behavior. The findings are robust across the samples from the two very diverse societies. These results suggest that greater attention be given to protection in problem behavior research and that a more nuanced perspective is needed about the roles that particular protective and risk factors play in reducing problem behavior and in promoting pro-social behavior.

Keywords

Protective factors Risk factors Problem behavior Pro-social behavior Problem Behavior Theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Data collection was supported by William T. Grant Foundation (Grant No. 99202099).

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, B. K. (1997). Introduction: Adolescent socialization in context—the role of connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, B. K., & Olsen, J. A. (1997). Socialization in context: Connection, regulation, and autonomy in the family, school, and neighborhood, and with peers. Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(2), 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, B. K., & Xia, M. (2013). The centrality of control to parenting and its effects. In R. E. Larzelere, A. S. Morris, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development (pp. 61–87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson, P. L. (1997). All kids are our kids. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Bernat, D. H., Oakes, J. M., Pettingell, S. L., & Resnick, M. (2012). Risk and direct protective factors for youth violence: Results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S57–S66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blum, R. W., Halcon, L., Beuhring, T., Pate, E., Campell-Forrester, S., & Venema, A. (2003). Adolescent health in the Caribbean: Risk and protective factors. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 456–460.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciairano, S., et al. (2009). Adolescent risk behavior in Italy and The Netherlands: A cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors. European Psychologist, 14(3), 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45(12), 1304–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, F. M., Jessor, R., Turbin, M. S., Dong, Q., Zhang, H., & Wang, C. (2005). The role of social contexts in adolescence: Context protection and context risk in the U.S. and China. Applied Developmental Science, 9, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guerra, N. G., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2008). Linking the prevention of problem behaviors and positive youth development: Core competencies for positive youth development and risk prevention. In N. G. Guerra & C. P. Bradshaw (Eds.), Core competencies to prevent problem behaviors and promote positive youth development. New directions for child and adolescent development (Vol. 122, pp. 1–17). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herrenkohl, T. I., Lee, J., & Hawkins, J. D. (2012). Risk versus direct protective factors and youth violence: Seattle Social Development Project. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S41–S56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hilliard, L. J., Bowers, E. P., Greenman, K. N., Herschberg, R. M., Geldof, G. J., Glickman, S. A., et al. (2014). Beyond the deficit model: Bullying and trajectories of character virtues in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0094-y.Google Scholar
  15. Jessor, R. (1991). Risk behavior in adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Journal of Adolescent Health, 12(8), 597–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jessor, R. (2008). Description versus explanation in cross-national research on adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(6), 527–528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jessor, R. (2014). Problem Behavior Theory: A half-century of research on adolescent behavior and development. In J. Brooks-Gunn, R. M. Lerner, A. C. Petersen, & R. K. Silbereisen (Eds.), The developmental science of adolescence: History through autobiography. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jessor, R., Donovan, J. E., & Costa, F. M. (1991). Beyond adolescence: Problem behavior and young adult development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jessor, R., Graves, T. D., Hanson, R. C., & Jessor, S. L. (1968). Society, personality, and deviant behavior: A study of a tri-ethnic community. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  20. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jessor, R., Turbin, M. S., & Costa, F. M. (1998a). Protective factors in adolescent health behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 788–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jessor, R., Turbin, M. S., & Costa, F. M. (1998b). Risk and protection in successful outcomes among disadvantaged adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jessor, R., Turbin, M. S., & Costa, F. M. (2010). Predicting developmental change in healthy eating and regular exercise among adolescents in China and the United States: The role of psychosocial and behavioral protection and risk. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(3), 707–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jessor, R., Turbin, M. S., Costa, F. M., Dong, Q., Zhang, H., & Wang, C. (2003). Adolescent problem behavior in China and the United States: A cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(3), 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jessor, R., Van Den Bos, J., Vanderryn, J., Costa, F. M., & Turbin, M. S. (1995). Protective factors in adolescent problem behavior: Moderator effects and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 923–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knight, G. P., & Hill, N. E. (1998). Measurement equivalence in research involving minority adolescents. In V. C. McLoyd & L. D. Steinberg (Eds.), Studying minority adolescents: Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical issues (pp. 183–210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Lerner, R. M., & Benson, P. L. (Eds.). (2003). Developmental assets and asset-building communities: Implications for research, policy, and practice. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  29. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Lösel, F., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S8–S23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luthar, S. S., & Cicchetti, D. (2000). The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Development and Psychopathology, 12(4), 857–885.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madkour, A. S., Farhat, T., Halpern, C. T., Gabhainn, S. N., & Godeau, E. (2012). Parents’ support and knowledge of their daughters’ lives, and females’ early sexual initiation in nine European countries. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44(3), 167–175.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Madkour, A. S., Farhat, T., Halpern, C. T., Godeau, E., & Gabhainn, S. N. (2010). Early adolescent sexual initiation as a problem behavior: A comparative study of five nations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47(4), 389–398.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ndugwa, R. P., Kabiru, C. W., Cleland, J., Beguy, D., Egondi, T., Zulu, E. M., et al. (2010). Adolescent problem behavior in Nairobi’s informal settlements: Applying Problem Behavior Theory in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Urban Health, 88(Suppl. 2), 298–317.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Pardini, D. A., Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2012). Identifying direct protective factors for nonviolence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S28–S40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phelps, E., Balsano, A. B., Fay, K., Peltz, J. S., Zimmerman, S. M., Lerner, R. M., et al. (2007). Nuances in early adolescent developmental trajectories of positive and problematic/risk behaviors: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16, 473–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piko, B. F., & Kovacs, E. (2010). Do parents and school matter? Protective factors for adolescent substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 35(1), 53–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rutter, M. (1993). Resilience: Some conceptual considerations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 14(8), 626–631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simantov, E., Schoen, C., & Klein, J. D. (2000). Health-compromising behaviors: Why do adolescents smoke or drink? Identifying underlying risk and protective factors. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 154(10), 1025–1033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turbin, M. S., Jessor, R., Costa, F. M., Dong, Q., Zhang, H., & Wang, C. (2006). Protective and risk factors in health-enhancing behavior among adolescents in China and the United States: Does social context matter? Health Psychology, 25(4), 445–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vazsonyi, A. T., Chen, P., Jenkins, D. D., Burcu, E., Torrente, G., & Sheu, C.-J. (2010). Jessor’s Problem Behavior Theory: Cross-national evidence from Hungary, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1779–1791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vazsonyi, A. T., Chen, P., Young, M., Jenkins, D., Browder, S., Kahumoku, E., et al. (2008). A test of Jessor’s Problem Behavior Theory in a Eurasian and a Western European developmental context. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(6), 555–564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.KalispellUSA

Personalised recommendations