‘Here, We Are Addicted To Loitering’: Exploring Narratives of Work and Mobility Among Migrant Women in Delhi

Part of the Gender, Development and Social Change book series (GDSC)


This chapter analyses how migrant women in two specific kinds of paid work—industrial/factory work and home-based work—articulate, understand and perceive economic, social and spatial mobility. Drawing upon fieldwork among women workers living around two industrial estates in the city of Delhi, this chapter argues that the economic agency brought about by paid employment is situated within and shaped by the spatial mobility offered by the city, and the enabling nature of city spaces in relation to the rural. The narratives bring forth complex articulations of social status and honour which, while always being relational to the meanings attached to the rural, call for new ways of understanding and engendering the concept of mobility for migrant women.


Labour Migration Migrant Woman Woman Worker Industrial Estate Spatial Mobility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abraham, Janaki. 2010. Veiling and the Production of Gender and Space in a Town in North India: A Critique of the Public/Private Dichotomy. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 17(2): 191–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baviskar, Amita. 2009. Breaking Homes, Making Cities: Class and Gender in the Politics of Urban Displacement. In Displaced by Development: Confronting Marginalization and Gender in Justice, ed. L. Mehta, 59–81. New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2011. Cows, Cars and Cycle-rickshaws: Bourgeois Environmentalists and the Battle for Delhi’s Streets. In Elite and Everyman: The Cultural Politics of the Indian Middle Classes, eds. Amita Baviskar and Raka Ray, 391–418. New Delhi: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brosius, Christiane. 2010. India’s Middle Class: New Forms of Urban Leisure, Consumption and Prosperity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. CWDS. 2012. Gender and Migration: Negotiating Rights—A Women’s Movement Perspective. New Delhi: Centre for Women’s Development Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Damodaran, Sumangala. 2013. ‘Women’ versus ‘Breadwinners’: Exploring Labour Market Dynamics, Agency & Identity Among Migrant Nurses from Kerala (India). Global Labour Journal 4(3): 186–205. Accessed 23 January 2016.
  8. de Haan, Arjan. 2000. Migrants, Livelihoods and Rights: The Relevance of Migration in Development Policies (Social Development Working Paper No. 4). Department for International Development, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Elson, Diane, and Ruth Pearson. 1981. ‘Nimble Fingers Make Cheap Workers’: An Analysis of Women’s Employment in Third World Export Manufacturing. Feminist Review 7: 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fernandez, Roberto M., and Celina Su. 2004. Space in the Study of Labor Markets. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 545–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandez-Kelly, Patricia, and Diane Wolf. 2015. A Dialogue on Globalization. Signs 26(4): 1243–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghertner, Asher D. 2015. Rule by Aesthetics: World Class City Making in Delhi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gidwani, Vinay, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2003. Circular Migration and the Spaces of Cultural Assertion. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(1): 186–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. GNCTD. 2013. Delhi Human Development Report, 2013: Improving Lives, Promoting Inclusion. New Delhi: Academic Foundation and Institute for Human Development, for the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi.Google Scholar
  15. Gough, Katherine V. 2008. Moving Around: The Social and Spatial Mobility of Youth in Lusaka. Geografiska Annaler Series B, Human Geography 90(3): 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanson, Susan, and Geraldine Pratt. 1995. Gender, Work, and Space. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herod, Andrew. 2003. Workers, Space and Labour Geography. International Labor and Working-Class History 64: 112–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hochschild, A.R., and A. Machung. 2003. The Second Shift. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Kabeer, N. 2000. The Power to Choose: Bangladeshi Women and Labour Market Decisions in London and Dhaka. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  20. Kandiyoti, Deniz. 1988. Bargaining with Patriarchy. Gender and Society 2(3): 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kapadia, Karin. 2002. Translocal Modernities and Transformation of Gender and Caste. In The Violence of Development: The Politics of Identity, Gender, and Social Inequalities in India, ed. Karin Kapadia, 142–183. New Delhi: Kali for Women.Google Scholar
  22. Kaur, Ravinder. 2006. Migrating for Work: Rewriting Gender Relations. In Poverty, Gender and Migration, eds. Sadhna Arya and Anupama Roy, 193–213. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Massey, Doreen. 1994. Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Mazumdar, Indrani, N. Neetha, and Indu Agnihotri. 2013. Migration and Gender in India. Economic and Political Weekly 48(10): 54–64.Google Scholar
  25. Neetha, N. 2002. Flexible Production, Feminisation and Disorganisation: Evidence from Tiruppur Knitwear Industry. Economic and Political Weekly 37(21): 2045–2052.Google Scholar
  26. ——— 2004. Making of Female Breadwinner: Migration and Social Networking of Women Domestics in Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly 39(17): 1681–1688.Google Scholar
  27. Phadke, Shilpa, Sameera Khan, and Shilpa Ranade. 2011. Why Loiter? Women & Risk on Mumbai Streets. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Ray, Raka. 2000. Masculinity, Femininity and Servitude: Domestic Workers in Calcutta in the Late Twentieth Century. Feminist Studies 26(3): 691–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Savage, Mike. 1988. The Missing Link? The Relationship Between Spatial Mobility and Social Mobility. The British Journal of Sociology 39(4): 554–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharma, Sonal and Eesha Kunduri. 2015. ‘Working from Home is Better than Going Out to the Factories’ (?): Spatial Embeddedness, Agency and Labour-Market Decisions of Women in the City of Delhi. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal (SAMAJ), Free-Standing Articles. Accessed 23 January 2016.
  31. Silvey, R., and V. Lawson. 1999. Placing the Migrant. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89(1): 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thapan, Meenakshi, Anshu Singh, and Nidhitha Sreekumar. 2014. Women’s Mobility and Migration: Muslim Women Migrants in Jamia Nagar. Economic and Political Weekly 49(23): 96–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology, Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Urbanisation, Centre for Policy ResearchNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations