Skip to main content

‘Here, We Are Addicted To Loitering’: Exploring Narratives of Work and Mobility Among Migrant Women in Delhi

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Land, Labour and Livelihoods

Part of the book series: Gender, Development and Social Change ((GDSC))

Abstract

This chapter analyses how migrant women in two specific kinds of paid work—industrial/factory work and home-based work—articulate, understand and perceive economic, social and spatial mobility. Drawing upon fieldwork among women workers living around two industrial estates in the city of Delhi, this chapter argues that the economic agency brought about by paid employment is situated within and shaped by the spatial mobility offered by the city, and the enabling nature of city spaces in relation to the rural. The narratives bring forth complex articulations of social status and honour which, while always being relational to the meanings attached to the rural, call for new ways of understanding and engendering the concept of mobility for migrant women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The findings of this chapter are based on a research project on migration, industrial work and worker identities in the city of Delhi, conducted at the School of Development Studies, Ambedkar University, Delhi (AUD), with which the authors were associated as researchers. We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Indian Council of Social Science Research, New Delhi, and the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, for supporting the project. We thank Sumangala Damodaran for her constant guidance and encouragement as Project Director in pursuing the research questions in this chapter, and to all our colleagues for their valuable contributions that enriched our findings. We are grateful to Saumyajit Bhattacharya for comments given on an early draft, and to Bina Fernandez and Orlanda Ruthven for their helpful feedback in fine-tuning subsequent drafts of the chapter. We thank Bindhulakshmi P. for an insightful discussion of the chapter, and participants at the workshop for helpful questions and comments.

  2. 2.

    For women workers, we have captured data on their place of birth, their husband’s native village/town and place of last residence. In this chapter, unless otherwise specified, women workers’ place of origin mostly implies the native place (village/town) of their husbands, from where most of them had migrated to Delhi. Most women workers, as our fieldwork revealed, constantly contrast their experiences of migration and work in the city with the village. On further investigation, in most cases it was found that references to a village by women implied their husbands’ village. Cases where this understanding differed involved women migrants who came to Delhi at a young age with their parents, generally prior to marriage.

  3. 3.

    All names are pseudonyms.

  4. 4.

    In our sample survey, the range of monthly earnings for women workers was extremely narrow, ranging from a minimum of 200 rupees to a maximum of 5,000 rupees. The minimum figure is not surprising, as several home-based workers, who work according to piece-rates, reported meagre earnings that fluctuated according to the production cycle in factories. Contrarily, the monthly earnings of male workers were spread out from a minimum of 2,500 rupees to a maximum of 60,000 rupees. Furthermore, the monthly median earnings were notably lower for women workers (4,000 rupees) compared to that of male workers (8,500 rupees).

  5. 5.

    Across varied industrial categories in our sample—such as the manufacturing of steel utensils, food products, garments and textiles, plastic products, toys and so on—women were concentrated in operations such as labelling, packing and packaging. These operations are viewed as halka kaam (light work) and thus deemed appropriate for women, relegating them to tasks on the lower end of the labour hierarchy, with lower pay, which gives rise to the gendered nature of these tasks.

  6. 6.

    The original statement in Hindi from which this is translated is: ‘Aur yahan, humein awarapan ki aadat hai.’

  7. 7.

    We use the term ‘hegemonic femininities’ in the way Raka Ray (2000) applies it, wherein one’s husband’s ability to earn a living and take care of his wife is central. Working-class women find themselves struggling with hegemonic femininities, as their husband’s income may often not be sufficient, and leads to women having to work outside the home (see Ray 2000).

  8. 8.

    Kandiyoti (1988, 275) argues that, ‘women strategize within a set of concrete constraints that reveal and define the blueprint of … the patriarchal bargain of any given society, which may exhibit variations according to class, caste, and ethnicity. These patriarchal bargains exert a powerful influence on the shaping of women’s gendered subjectivity and determine the nature of gender ideology in different contexts.’

References

  • Abraham, Janaki. 2010. Veiling and the Production of Gender and Space in a Town in North India: A Critique of the Public/Private Dichotomy. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 17(2): 191–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baviskar, Amita. 2009. Breaking Homes, Making Cities: Class and Gender in the Politics of Urban Displacement. In Displaced by Development: Confronting Marginalization and Gender in Justice, ed. L. Mehta, 59–81. New Delhi: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Cows, Cars and Cycle-rickshaws: Bourgeois Environmentalists and the Battle for Delhi’s Streets. In Elite and Everyman: The Cultural Politics of the Indian Middle Classes, eds. Amita Baviskar and Raka Ray, 391–418. New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Richard Nice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosius, Christiane. 2010. India’s Middle Class: New Forms of Urban Leisure, Consumption and Prosperity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • CWDS. 2012. Gender and Migration: Negotiating Rights—A Women’s Movement Perspective. New Delhi: Centre for Women’s Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, Sumangala. 2013. ‘Women’ versus ‘Breadwinners’: Exploring Labour Market Dynamics, Agency & Identity Among Migrant Nurses from Kerala (India). Global Labour Journal 4(3): 186–205. https://escarpmentpress.org/globallabour/article/view/1140. Accessed 23 January 2016.

  • de Haan, Arjan. 2000. Migrants, Livelihoods and Rights: The Relevance of Migration in Development Policies (Social Development Working Paper No. 4). Department for International Development, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, Diane, and Ruth Pearson. 1981. ‘Nimble Fingers Make Cheap Workers’: An Analysis of Women’s Employment in Third World Export Manufacturing. Feminist Review 7: 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, Roberto M., and Celina Su. 2004. Space in the Study of Labor Markets. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 545–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Kelly, Patricia, and Diane Wolf. 2015. A Dialogue on Globalization. Signs 26(4): 1243–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghertner, Asher D. 2015. Rule by Aesthetics: World Class City Making in Delhi. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gidwani, Vinay, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 2003. Circular Migration and the Spaces of Cultural Assertion. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(1): 186–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GNCTD. 2013. Delhi Human Development Report, 2013: Improving Lives, Promoting Inclusion. New Delhi: Academic Foundation and Institute for Human Development, for the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, Katherine V. 2008. Moving Around: The Social and Spatial Mobility of Youth in Lusaka. Geografiska Annaler Series B, Human Geography 90(3): 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Susan, and Geraldine Pratt. 1995. Gender, Work, and Space. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herod, Andrew. 2003. Workers, Space and Labour Geography. International Labor and Working-Class History 64: 112–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A.R., and A. Machung. 2003. The Second Shift. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. 2000. The Power to Choose: Bangladeshi Women and Labour Market Decisions in London and Dhaka. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiyoti, Deniz. 1988. Bargaining with Patriarchy. Gender and Society 2(3): 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapadia, Karin. 2002. Translocal Modernities and Transformation of Gender and Caste. In The Violence of Development: The Politics of Identity, Gender, and Social Inequalities in India, ed. Karin Kapadia, 142–183. New Delhi: Kali for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, Ravinder. 2006. Migrating for Work: Rewriting Gender Relations. In Poverty, Gender and Migration, eds. Sadhna Arya and Anupama Roy, 193–213. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Doreen. 1994. Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, Indrani, N. Neetha, and Indu Agnihotri. 2013. Migration and Gender in India. Economic and Political Weekly 48(10): 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neetha, N. 2002. Flexible Production, Feminisation and Disorganisation: Evidence from Tiruppur Knitwear Industry. Economic and Political Weekly 37(21): 2045–2052.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2004. Making of Female Breadwinner: Migration and Social Networking of Women Domestics in Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly 39(17): 1681–1688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phadke, Shilpa, Sameera Khan, and Shilpa Ranade. 2011. Why Loiter? Women & Risk on Mumbai Streets. New Delhi: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, Raka. 2000. Masculinity, Femininity and Servitude: Domestic Workers in Calcutta in the Late Twentieth Century. Feminist Studies 26(3): 691–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Mike. 1988. The Missing Link? The Relationship Between Spatial Mobility and Social Mobility. The British Journal of Sociology 39(4): 554–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Sonal and Eesha Kunduri. 2015. ‘Working from Home is Better than Going Out to the Factories’ (?): Spatial Embeddedness, Agency and Labour-Market Decisions of Women in the City of Delhi. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal (SAMAJ), Free-Standing Articles. https://samaj.revues.org/3977. Accessed 23 January 2016.

  • Silvey, R., and V. Lawson. 1999. Placing the Migrant. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89(1): 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapan, Meenakshi, Anshu Singh, and Nidhitha Sreekumar. 2014. Women’s Mobility and Migration: Muslim Women Migrants in Jamia Nagar. Economic and Political Weekly 49(23): 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonal Sharma .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sharma, S., Kunduri, E. (2016). ‘Here, We Are Addicted To Loitering’: Exploring Narratives of Work and Mobility Among Migrant Women in Delhi. In: Land, Labour and Livelihoods. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40865-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics